/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← β†’ days Β· ↑ ↓ browse Β· Enter similar Β· o open

Several macOS Monterey features will not come to Intel Macs, like Live Text within photos, FaceTime's Portrait mode, and unlimited, on-device keyboard dictation

Intel Macs left in dust Stephen Hackett / Six Colors : WWDC 2021: macOS Monterey further blurs lines between Mac, Catalyst, and iPad apps Chris Barylick / O'Grady's PowerPage : Some macOS Monterey features will only work with Apple Silicon hardware Abdullah / Gizchina : Some macOS Monterey features will not be available for macs based on Intel processors JC Torres / SlashGear : macOS Monterey on Intel Macs won't be able to use some features Tyler Lee / Ubergizmo : Some macOS Monterey Features Won't Be Available For Intel Macs Cal Jeffrey / TechSpot : Some of macOS Monterey's best features won't work with Intel-based Macs Michael Kan / PCMag : Intel-Based Macs Won't Get Every MacOS Monterey Feature Tweets: Rene Ritchie / @reneritchie : It's because Intel Macs don't have the neural engine these features require. M1 is an A14X+. T2 is an A10 (pre-ANE). T1 was an S2 (watch SiP). Previous Intel Macs had nothing. These features all lean on the neural engine. https://t.co/jxqB7LsR2Q Thomas Ricouard / @dimillian : I'll go cry in a corner https://twitter.com/... Abby Fuller / @abbyfuller : Every year Apple fucks compatibility over in some new and exciting way πŸ™ƒ Rene Ritchie / @reneritchie : Previously: Apple Lossless won't be coming to inherently lossy BT headsets Currently: Neural Engine-dependent macOS features won't be coming to Macs without neural engines Each time we have a choice whether to serve our audience and educate or exploit them and rage-bait https://twitter.com/... @thelinuxexp : Excluding these features for Intel based Macs makes no sense apart from Β« we want you to buy a new one Β» https://twitter.com/... Vijay Shekhar Sharma / @vijayshekhar : Clearly someone is deeply inspired by Alan Kay πŸ˜‡ β€œPeople who are really serious about software should make their own hardware.” https://twitter.com/... Mehedi / @mehedih_ : this is unacceptable considering the fact that Apple still sells Intel Macs β€” but they'll get away with it like with everything else https://twitter.com/... Steve Troughton-Smith / @stroughtonsmith : You didn't think they'd string along Intel Macs for long, did you...? πŸ˜… https://twitter.com/...

MacRumors Joe Rossignol

Context & Ripple Effects

Apple had already committed the Mac to its own processor roadmap with the M1 system-on-a-chip launch, after earlier coverage framed the move as a transition away from Intel. The shared architecture also let Apple bring iOS apps natively to Apple-silicon Macs, making software capabilityβ€”not just chip performanceβ€”a differentiator.

Monterey is the first clear feature-tiering signal in that transition: Apple is defining parts of the current Mac experience around hardware Intel systems do not have.

First-order effects

  • Intel Mac owners receive Monterey without Live Text in photos, FaceTime Portrait mode, or unlimited on-device keyboard dictation, while Apple-silicon Mac owners receive those capabilities.
  • Apple gains a direct software-feature distinction for Apple Silicon beyond the M1's previously reported performance gains.

Second-order effects

  • Processor choice becomes part of the Monterey buying decision: customers comparing Intel and Apple-silicon Macs are no longer choosing between identical operating-system feature sets.
  • Apple's Mac software roadmap can increasingly prioritize capabilities designed around its own silicon, widening the practical gap between new Apple-silicon Macs and still-supported Intel models.

Third-order effects

  • If Apple repeats this approach in later releases, Mac support will evolve from a single platform with different performance levels into processor-specific feature tiers, with Apple Silicon setting the pace for new experiences.
  • The transition shifts competitive pressure from benchmark comparisons toward control of the hardware-software stack, the direction signaled by Apple's planned ARM-based Mac transition.

The trend: Apple is using exclusive software capabilities to turn its silicon transition into a broader shift toward tightly integrated, heterogeneous on-device computing.

Discussion

  • @reneritchie Rene Ritchie on x
    It's because Intel Macs don't have the neural engine these features require. M1 is an A14X+. T2 is an A10 (pre-ANE). T1 was an S2 (watch SiP). Previous Intel Macs had nothing. These features all lean on the neural engine. https://t.co/jxqB7LsR2Q
  • @dimillian Thomas Ricouard on x
    I'll go cry in a corner https://twitter.com/...
  • @abbyfuller Abby Fuller on x
    Every year Apple fucks compatibility over in some new and exciting way πŸ™ƒ
  • @reneritchie Rene Ritchie on x
    Previously: Apple Lossless won't be coming to inherently lossy BT headsets Currently: Neural Engine-dependent macOS features won't be coming to Macs without neural engines Each time we have a choice whether to serve our audience and educate or exploit them and rage-bait https://t…
  • @thelinuxexp @thelinuxexp on x
    Excluding these features for Intel based Macs makes no sense apart from Β« we want you to buy a new one Β» https://twitter.com/...
  • @vijayshekhar Vijay Shekhar Sharma on x
    Clearly someone is deeply inspired by Alan Kay πŸ˜‡ β€œPeople who are really serious about software should make their own hardware.” https://twitter.com/...
  • @mehedih_ Mehedi on x
    this is unacceptable considering the fact that Apple still sells Intel Macs β€” but they'll get away with it like with everything else https://twitter.com/...
  • @stroughtonsmith Steve Troughton-Smith on x
    You didn't think they'd string along Intel Macs for long, did you...? πŸ˜… https://twitter.com/...