/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

As the installed base of Apple Watch approaches 100M, with an estimated 35% of US iPhone users wearing one, rivals are yet to make a credible competing device

In a few months, the number of people wearing an Apple Watch will surpass 100 million.  While the tech press spent years infatuated …

Above Avalon Neil Cybart

Context & Ripple Effects

This story closes an arc that began with skepticism: in late 2015, Canalys estimated Apple had shipped just seven million Watches, fewer than some projected. Five years later, Above Avalon pegs the installed base near 100 million — with roughly 35% of US iPhone users wearing one — and a follow-up estimate confirmed the 100M user mark was reached around December, with 30 million added in 2020 alone.

The scale is already historic: Apple shipped 30.7M Watches in 2019, outselling the entire Swiss watch industry by unit volume. The competitive puzzle is that none of that growth forced a credible rival into existence — the Watch compounds because it sits inside Apple's iPhone platform.

First-order effects

  • Rivals competing for wrist real estate now face a base of ~100M users whose device, apps, and health data are already locked to the iPhone ecosystem — every quarter of delay widens the switching cost.

Second-order effects

  • With the premium segment effectively conceded to Apple, competitor volume shifts down-market — consistent with Counterpoint's later finding that the sub-$100 smartwatch segment grew 547% YoY even as overall market growth trailed Apple's installed-base momentum.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, wearables consolidate into a two-tier industry: one platform vendor monetizing a massive active base through services and upgrades, and a fragmented low-cost tier competing on price — with the wrist becoming another lever of Apple's iPhone lock-in rather than an independent product category.

The trend: Smartwatches are consolidating around the platform gatekeeper that controls the paired phone, leaving rivals to compete only in the low-price tier Apple does not occupy.

Discussion

  • @jhamby Jake Hamby on x
    Rivals are yet to make any single watch nearly as popular. Nobody really got everyone on the same page to compete against Apple like Android had done previously with smartphones & tablets, or Microsoft with Windows on PCs. https://twitter.com/...
  • @0zne Enzo Avigo on x
    35%??? https://twitter.com/... I guess i live in an echo chamber.
  • @turnernovak Turner Novak on x
    35% of US iPhone users wear an Apple Watch https://twitter.com/...
  • @909kishore Kishore Doddi on x
    “In a few months, the number of people wearing an Apple Watch will surpass 100 million.” If these estimates are accurate, they're incredible. Coupled with Airpods, Apple has an enormous lead on wearables and is set to dominate smart glasses. https://twitter.com/...
  • @tidefallcapital Trevor Scott on x
    $AAPL finally got the cross selling moat right. Sorry $WFC https://twitter.com/...
  • @hrushb Hrush Bhatt on x
    “Despite the hopes of Amazon & Google, people are not using stationary speakers for much else besides listening to music and rudimentary tasks like setting kitchen timers.” https://www.aboveavalon.com/ ...
  • @michaelmiraflor Michael J. Miraflor on x
    Swiss watch makers still don't have an answer. Low and Mid-tier Swiss is like the Point and Shoot camera industry's battle vs smartphone cameras a decade ago. Futile attempts to curtail the inevitable. https://twitter.com/...
  • @neilcybart Neil Cybart on x
    New @AboveAvalon article: Apple Watch Momentum Is Building https://www.aboveavalon.com/ ... If the Apple Watch is a runaway train, there is no obvious candidate in a position to stop or even slow the train.
  • @neilcybart Neil Cybart on x
    According to my estimates, approximately 35% of iPhone users in the U.S. now wear an Apple Watch. This is a shockingly high % for a five-year-old product category, and it says a lot about how Apple's intuition about bringing utility to the wrist was right. https://www.aboveavalon…