FSB

US and UK accusations in December 2023 cast Russia’s FSB as the organizer of a hacking campaign targeting democratic institutions, energy networks and intelligence targets.

Who they are

Coverage identifies the FSB as Russia’s security service, appearing chiefly as an actor in domestic information control, cyberespionage allegations and links between Russian intelligence and technology contractors. Stories also connect it to pressure on platforms and devices, including the removal of Alexei Navalny’s app from Apple and Google stores and restrictions on Apple devices for state officials.

The recent arc

The coverage’s most sustained recent period ran through 2023, following its all-time peak in early 2022. Early stories focused on the FSB’s detention of REvil members at the US request and reported pressure on Apple and Google over Navalny’s app; subsequent reporting shifted toward cross-border cyber operations, including the FBI’s disruption of Snake malware and the US and UK’s December 2023 accusations of a long-running FSB hacking campaign.

More recent reporting has moved from discrete hacking cases to the infrastructure of state control. An OCCRP investigation tied network engineer Viktor Vedeneev’s companies to the FSB while describing their role in Telegram infrastructure, and the Financial Times reported in June 2026 that FSB-orchestrated, intermittent internet outages were affecting daily life across Russia. One May 2026 item concerns the separate Financial Stability Board, whose shared FSB abbreviation makes it distinct from the Russia-focused security-service coverage.

The tension

The central tension is between the FSB’s alleged role in extending Russian state control—over networks, platforms and domestic communications—and the counterpressure from foreign governments and technology companies. US and UK authorities attribute cyber campaigns and malware operations to the service, while Apple rejected the FSB’s allegation that it worked with the NSA to compromise iPhones; contractor links involving NTC Vulkan and Vedeneev’s companies point to the commercial infrastructure surrounding that contest.

Why it matters

If the trajectory reflected in the latest reporting continues, FSB coverage will increasingly concern not only espionage operations but the operational resilience of Russia’s own digital public sphere. The combination of alleged contractor-supported capabilities, pressure on major platforms and reported network outages suggests that control of connectivity is becoming as consequential as individual intrusion campaigns, though the corpus does not establish how durable or broadly coordinated those measures will be.

Related: Russia · U.S. · Sources: Apple and Google removed Kremlin critic Navalny's app in Sept · The US and the UK accuse Russia's FSB of orchestrating a global hackin · The US says the FBI disrupted a long-running Russian cyberespionage op