/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Rep. David Cicilline, leading a push for a new Big Tech antitrust legislation, says it will prohibit Apple from impeding users from removing pre-installed apps

distracting the company from its growth areas, risking regulatory retaliation, making its higher information users mad, and all not actually that much $$ in Apple terms. https://www.slowboring.com/... Steven Sinofsky / @stevesi : A funny thing about this was how Apple including pages, numbers, keynote *pushed*'competition towards the dominant incumbent productivity suite. https://twitter.com/... Rep. Ken Buck / @repkenbuck : Big Tech and the DC Swamp are lobbying against my antitrust bills. Don't side with them. Break them up. Luther Lowe / @lutherlowe : Hey look the entire basis of @benedictevans tweet storm is a bad faith read of a misquoting of @davidcicilline. Maybe we should stop looking to VCs (who are in on the take) for our antitrust analysis https://twitter.com/... Eric Seufert / @eric_seufert : Probably unsurprisingly, I find the anti-trust bills directed at “Big Tech” that were introduced by the House last week to be very troubling. Not because legislators dont understand the products. But because the business models are not understood (1/X) https://www.youtube.com/... Jonah Goldberg / @jonahdispatch : Struggling to understand why this isn't preposterous. https://twitter.com/... Rebecca Kern / @rebeccamkern : We've updated our story to reflect revisions that platforms like Apple wouldn't be allowed to block users from deleting pre-installed apps. While Apple could pre-install apps, they couldn't advantage their apps over competitors https://www.bloomberg.com/... Marsha Collier / @marshacollier : #Apple Pre-Installed Apps Would Be Banned Under Antitrust Package Legislation prohibits #tech platforms from giving an advantage to their own products over those of competitors ❓Does this mean #Samsung as well? ❓ #AntiTrust https://finance.yahoo.com/... https://twitter.com/... Timothy Sandefur / @timothysandefur : As usual with antitrust law: stupid and counterproductive. https://twitter.com/... Sean Hackbarth / @seanhackbarth : Oh, so Members of Congress want to destroy the perfectly capable “supercomputer” in my pocket. Gee, thanks? https://twitter.com/... Benedict Evans / @benedictevans : @lutherlowe @rebeccamkern There are two laws. One of them bans self-referencing. The other bans pre-install of any app or device anyone could compete with, which , by definition, means any app at all. Instead of accusing people of lying, you should perhaps read the actual bills PoliMath / @politicalmath : I'm pretty ok with this Apple has brought this on themselves with truly grotesque anti-competitive business practices in their app store https://gadgets.ndtv.com/... https://twitter.com/... Benedict Evans / @benedictevans : Probably not a good thing that the first time I've thought of Yelp in about 5 years is to discover its head lobbyist is accusing me of being bribed by Apple. 👀 Max Woolf / @minimaxir : technically the App Store is a preinstalled app https://twitter.com/... Benny Rom / @benjarom3 : @charlesarthur If you were careful with the UX it would not be that bad. “What email service do you use?” etc is really not that big a deal to ask once per iCloud account, is it? Eric Seufert / @eric_seufert : 6/ The “Senator, we run ads” moment makes me skeptical that the government can police these companies as they engage in anticompetitive self-dealing dressed up as goodwill to the consumer (eg ATT). Whats happening is regulatory capture through confusion / distraction Adam Thierer / @adamthierer : America's new #antitrust policy approach will apparently mandate a return to the flip phone era. 🤦 This is recipe for not only undermining consumer welfare but for destroying US national competitiveness. A horrible step backwards. https://twitter.com/... Heath Mayo / @heathmayo : Actively damaging consumer welfare in the name of “consumer welfare.” Brilliant... https://twitter.com/... Bob Wyman / @bobwyman : @benedictevans Can you propose better wording? I believe the intent is to say that if you operate a covered platform, you should not compete directly with users of that platform on that platform. (i.e. If you're Amazon, you should not publish books for sale on Amazon.) How would you word that? Benedict Evans / @benedictevans : Since some people are confused by this, the US has two proposed bills relating to apps on smartphones. One of them bans self-preferencing of Apple/Google's own services (reasonable) The other bans them from having any feature anyone else might want to make (insane) https://twitter.com/... Michael Gartenberg / @gartenberg : Correction, Cicilline didn't say that. Bloomberg reporter misunderstood him and has had to correct the story. So he's still clueless but perhaps not an idiot. https://twitter.com/... Rep. Ken Buck / @repkenbuck : I'm not taking a cent from Google, Facebook, Amazon, and Apple. Why are Republicans taking money from companies that censor conservatives? @alexlindsay : If you are an Apple User that enjoys ease of use, privacy, and things just working... The new bills proposed in Congress are an existential threat to your way of life. If you are OK with everything be like Android... It's fine, go about your business. Everything will be fine. Benedict Evans / @benedictevans : @bobwyman It's complicated. I wrote about some of the issues here. https://www.ben-evans.com/... Miguel de Icaza / @migueldeicaza : This has got to be the dumbest legislation I have ever seen. Might as well nationalize big tech, it would suck less. https://twitter.com/... Rep. Ken Buck / @repkenbuck : Big Tech is lobbying against my antitrust bills. Yet some Republicans are saying these bills help Big Tech? https://twitter.com/... Chris Lacy / @chrismlacy : My 2 cents: I've no problem w. Apple preinstalling its own apps. But I think: 1. Users must be able to change defaults for all apps. 2. Apple must allow 3rd parties to compete in currently closed app categories such as home screen, wallpapers, etc. https://www.bloomberg.com/... Richard Hoeg / @hoeglaw : Cool, seems I have another author of moronic tech legislation to add to my annual Senator Hawley deep dive. Remember folks, the fight against technology is bipartisan, but both sides are equally silly in the tools they intend to wield. https://twitter.com/... Alex Kantrowitz / @kantrowitz : Very interesting watching the backlash to the big tech bills take shape. Yes, the tech companies are funding some of the opposition. But... there are legit pros and cons to the legislation. It's going to be a fascinating debate. Charles Arthur / @charlesarthur : Does the OS count as an app? What's the dividing line? https://twitter.com/... Adam Kovacevich / @adamkovac : .@davidcicilline acknowledged that his bill would *ban* iPhones from coming with: 🚫iMessage 🚫FaceTime 🚫Find My Phone 🚫Notes 🚫Apple Podcasts It seems hard to fathom that this is what voters want from Congress. https://www.bloomberg.com/... https://twitter.com/... Christopher Beddow / @cbed32 : Would this affect Google as well as Apple? It could be a game changer if new consumer maps users got to choose an app manually, even if app search/précédent favors those big apps, it gives @openstreetmap based apps an opportunity for wider adoption. https://www.bloomberg.com/... Ken Yeung / @thekenyeung : Apple would be prohibited from preloading its apps under the antitrust bills introduced into the House. Wow, would this also be the same for Google? Can we do this for bloatware? :) https://www.bloomberg.com/... Neil Chilson / @neil_chilson : Up next: Blue Apron and Hungry Root cannot bundle recipes AND ingredients in the same meal kit. It's for your own good, people. https://twitter.com/... Dare Obasanjo / @carnage4life : Trying to picture buying a new iPhone and being dumped into the App Store on turning it on because antitrust law bans default apps on your phone. Will users consider this a better experience? Will people be mad when Apple search ads revenue booms? So many questions. https://twitter.com/... John Paczkowski / @johnpaczkowski : So much for “it just works” https://twitter.com/... Benedict Evans / @benedictevans : I do have a general thesis on regulation that utterly stupid laws like this are actually less of a problem, because they can't be implemented at all. The thing to watch are complex messes like cookie laws, that can implemented and cause lots of low level aggravation every day. Harry McCracken / @harrymccracken : Not sure that this would solve any of the real issues relating to the App Store economy. https://www.bloomberg.com/... Benedict Evans / @benedictevans : What purpose is solved by proposals this foolish? It's another ‘senator, we sell ads’ moment Benedict Evans / @benedictevans : Would it come with a command line or would you have to buy that once you'd turned on the phone? https://twitter.com/... Alec Stapp / @alecstapp : .@mattyglesias has the correct take on Apple & the App Store: Apple's conduct isn't illegal under current law and legislative proposals to make it illegal would likely do more harm than good. But Apple executives are making a mistake in how they currently run the App Store. https://twitter.com/... Alec Stapp / @alecstapp : I differ slightly with @mattyglesias on the solution. Apple should change commissions to 30% for games and 0% for non-game apps. Games make up about 80% of App Store revenue anyway and 30% commission is industry standard (see Xbox/Playstation/Nintendo) https://twitter.com/... Dare Obasanjo / @carnage4life : Microsoft catching a stray bullet after going around the world lobbying governments to regulate big tech is classic. Pending U.S. bills would ban acquisitions or competing with anyone who builds on its platforms (Office, Windows, Azure, etc). Oops. 🤦🏾‍♂ ️ https://twitter.com/... Benedict Evans / @benedictevans : The funniest thing about this wave of antitrust bills is that it's written to catch, block and shut down Microsoft, even though no-one in tech has been scared of Microsoft killing them for 10 or 15 years. Be careful what you lobby for...

Bloomberg Rebecca Kern

Discussion

  • @rebeccamkern Rebecca Kern on x
    .@davidcicilline confirmed that under his new antitrust legislation, @Apple would be banned from pre-installing apps on their iPhones/ read more on @TheTerminal @business
  • @richluchette Rich Luchette on x
    Just to correct the record, this is not what Cicilline said. iPhones can be shipped with pre-installed apps, but Apple could not stop someone from un-installing or changing their default settings under the non-discrimination bill. https://twitter.com/...
  • @benedictevans Benedict Evans on x
    This is not a reductio ad absurdum. This's a serious proposal that your phone come with blank screen. Who does this help?
  • @lutherlowe Luther Lowe on x
    Please read the bill instead of pushing misinformation. The bill explicitly prohibits Apple from restricting or impeding iPhone users from un-installing apps that have been preinstalled. This provision does not prohibit Apple from pre-installing Apps in the first place. https://t…
  • @gartenberg Michael Gartenberg on x
    Democratic Representative David Cicilline is clearly a clueless idiot. Other than that, his legislative ideas make perfect sense. https://t.co/7EImQeSMzj
  • @lacker Kevin Lacker on x
    The year is 2025. Pre-installing apps is banned. You buy an iPhone and turn it on. https://twitter.com/... https://twitter.com/...
  • @benedictevans Benedict Evans on x
    @lutherlowe @davidcicilline Black and white. You cannot provide any product or service on your platform. that could describe, well, anything. I know you (unlike me) are in fact paid to talk about this stuff, but you can still read the laws. https://twitter.com/...
  • @eric_seufert Eric Seufert on x
    5/ If you want to reign in FB's market power you have to break or create competitive intromission for its ads engine. Data portability doesnt accomplish that. But in the meantime, Apple is doing *exactly* that under the guise of privacy policy https://mobiledevmemo.com/...
  • @benedictevans Benedict Evans on x
    1: you cannot provide any product or service on your platform. That could mean anything. Spam detection? A clock? Maps? 2: you can't make anything that you could even theoretically give an unfair advantage to, even if you don't give it that advantage. So, you can't make..
  • @benedictevans Benedict Evans on x
    @lutherlowe @davidcicilline Hey Luther - 1: I'm not a VC 2: Since you accuse me of being ‘on the take’, no, I was not paid to say that by Apple. 3: The bill proposed does, explicitly and unambiguously, ban Apple for pre-installing any app. I suggest you read it. You can find it i…
  • @migueldeicaza Miguel de Icaza on x
    We won't get Medicare for all, expanded Supreme Court, infrastructure bill, election reform, but we are going to get a bipartisan bill to force Apple and Google to let you delete systems apps. Truly, Zuckerberg is the gift that keeps on giving.
  • @benjarom3 Benny Rom on x
    @charlesarthur If you were careful with the UX it would not be that bad. “What email service do you use?” etc is really not that big a deal to ask once per iCloud account, is it?
  • @eric_seufert Eric Seufert on x
    6/ The “Senator, we run ads” moment makes me skeptical that the government can police these companies as they engage in anticompetitive self-dealing dressed up as goodwill to the consumer (eg ATT). Whats happening is regulatory capture through confusion / distraction
  • @jason_kint Jason Kint on x
    I guess I'll just make this into a thread in hope that corrections become a thing for substackers. Bills can get modified but this is pretty important and inaccurate. It would only forbid Apple from restricting deletion of pre-installed apps. only here to help. https://twitter.co…
  • @charlesarthur Charles Arthur on x
    @benjarom3 what would happen in reality: you'd buy from the carrier, who'd preload it with junk. And their own App Store. Please explain how this is in any way better.
  • @charlesarthur Charles Arthur on x
    @benjarom3 don't worry, there would be. And you can't ban the carriers from doing it. Restraint of trade.
  • @benedictevans Benedict Evans on x
    (TBH, not sure why anyone would even bother arguing with this)
  • @cstar_ow CoolStar on x
    Apple shouldn't have been acting like a pile of shit to everyone with their App Store monopoly then https://twitter.com/...
  • @adamthierer Adam Thierer on x
    America's new #antitrust policy approach will apparently mandate a return to the flip phone era. 🤦 This is recipe for not only undermining consumer welfare but for destroying US national competitiveness. A horrible step backwards. https://twitter.com/...
  • @heathmayo Heath Mayo on x
    Actively damaging consumer welfare in the name of “consumer welfare.” Brilliant... https://twitter.com/...
  • @mattyglesias Matthew Yglesias on x
    Today's post: Apple's App Store rent seeking is worse than a crime, it's a blunder — distracting the company from its growth areas, risking regulatory retaliation, making its higher information users mad, and all not actually that much $$ in Apple terms. https://www.slowboring.co…
  • @stevesi Steven Sinofsky on x
    A funny thing about this was how Apple including pages, numbers, keynote *pushed*'competition towards the dominant incumbent productivity suite. https://twitter.com/...
  • @repkenbuck Rep. Ken Buck on x
    Big Tech and the DC Swamp are lobbying against my antitrust bills. Don't side with them. Break them up.
  • @bobwyman Bob Wyman on x
    @benedictevans Can you propose better wording? I believe the intent is to say that if you operate a covered platform, you should not compete directly with users of that platform on that platform. (i.e. If you're Amazon, you should not publish books for sale on Amazon.) How would …
  • @benedictevans Benedict Evans on x
    Since some people are confused by this, the US has two proposed bills relating to apps on smartphones. One of them bans self-preferencing of Apple/Google's own services (reasonable) The other bans them from having any feature anyone else might want to make (insane) https://twitte…
  • @cbed32 Christopher Beddow on x
    Would this affect Google as well as Apple? It could be a game changer if new consumer maps users got to choose an app manually, even if app search/précédent favors those big apps, it gives @openstreetmap based apps an opportunity for wider adoption. https://www.bloomberg.com/...
  • @lutherlowe Luther Lowe on x
    Hey look the entire basis of @benedictevans tweet storm is a bad faith read of a misquoting of @davidcicilline. Maybe we should stop looking to VCs (who are in on the take) for our antitrust analysis https://twitter.com/...
  • @gartenberg Michael Gartenberg on x
    Correction, Cicilline didn't say that. Bloomberg reporter misunderstood him and has had to correct the story. So he's still clueless but perhaps not an idiot. https://twitter.com/...
  • @eric_seufert Eric Seufert on x
    Probably unsurprisingly, I find the anti-trust bills directed at “Big Tech” that were introduced by the House last week to be very troubling. Not because legislators dont understand the products. But because the business models are not understood (1/X) https://www.youtube.com/...
  • @repkenbuck Rep. Ken Buck on x
    I'm not taking a cent from Google, Facebook, Amazon, and Apple. Why are Republicans taking money from companies that censor conservatives?
  • @jonahdispatch Jonah Goldberg on x
    Struggling to understand why this isn't preposterous. https://twitter.com/...
  • @rebeccamkern Rebecca Kern on x
    We've updated our story to reflect revisions that platforms like Apple wouldn't be allowed to block users from deleting pre-installed apps. While Apple could pre-install apps, they couldn't advantage their apps over competitors https://www.bloomberg.com/...
  • @marshacollier Marsha Collier on x
    #Apple Pre-Installed Apps Would Be Banned Under Antitrust Package Legislation prohibits #tech platforms from giving an advantage to their own products over those of competitors ❓Does this mean #Samsung as well? ❓ #AntiTrust https://finance.yahoo.com/... https://twitter.com/...
  • @timothysandefur Timothy Sandefur on x
    As usual with antitrust law: stupid and counterproductive. https://twitter.com/...
  • @alexlindsay @alexlindsay on x
    If you are an Apple User that enjoys ease of use, privacy, and things just working... The new bills proposed in Congress are an existential threat to your way of life. If you are OK with everything be like Android... It's fine, go about your business. Everything will be fine.
  • @benedictevans Benedict Evans on x
    @bobwyman It's complicated. I wrote about some of the issues here. https://www.ben-evans.com/...
  • @migueldeicaza Miguel de Icaza on x
    This has got to be the dumbest legislation I have ever seen. Might as well nationalize big tech, it would suck less. https://twitter.com/...
  • @repkenbuck Rep. Ken Buck on x
    Big Tech is lobbying against my antitrust bills. Yet some Republicans are saying these bills help Big Tech? https://twitter.com/...
  • @seanhackbarth Sean Hackbarth on x
    Oh, so Members of Congress want to destroy the perfectly capable “supercomputer” in my pocket. Gee, thanks? https://twitter.com/...
  • @benedictevans Benedict Evans on x
    @lutherlowe @rebeccamkern There are two laws. One of them bans self-referencing. The other bans pre-install of any app or device anyone could compete with, which , by definition, means any app at all. Instead of accusing people of lying, you should perhaps read the actual bills
  • @politicalmath PoliMath on x
    I'm pretty ok with this Apple has brought this on themselves with truly grotesque anti-competitive business practices in their app store https://gadgets.ndtv.com/... https://twitter.com/...
  • @chrismlacy Chris Lacy on x
    My 2 cents: I've no problem w. Apple preinstalling its own apps. But I think: 1. Users must be able to change defaults for all apps. 2. Apple must allow 3rd parties to compete in currently closed app categories such as home screen, wallpapers, etc. https://www.bloomberg.com/...
  • @benedictevans Benedict Evans on x
    Probably not a good thing that the first time I've thought of Yelp in about 5 years is to discover its head lobbyist is accusing me of being bribed by Apple. 👀
  • @charlesarthur Charles Arthur on x
    Does the OS count as an app? What's the dividing line? https://twitter.com/...
  • @adamkovac Adam Kovacevich on x
    .@davidcicilline acknowledged that his bill would *ban* iPhones from coming with: 🚫iMessage 🚫FaceTime 🚫Find My Phone 🚫Notes 🚫Apple Podcasts It seems hard to fathom that this is what voters want from Congress. https://www.bloomberg.com/... https://twitter.com/...
  • @hoeglaw Richard Hoeg on x
    Cool, seems I have another author of moronic tech legislation to add to my annual Senator Hawley deep dive. Remember folks, the fight against technology is bipartisan, but both sides are equally silly in the tools they intend to wield. https://twitter.com/...
  • @kantrowitz Alex Kantrowitz on x
    Very interesting watching the backlash to the big tech bills take shape. Yes, the tech companies are funding some of the opposition. But... there are legit pros and cons to the legislation. It's going to be a fascinating debate.
  • @minimaxir Max Woolf on x
    technically the App Store is a preinstalled app https://twitter.com/...
  • @thekenyeung Ken Yeung on x
    Apple would be prohibited from preloading its apps under the antitrust bills introduced into the House. Wow, would this also be the same for Google? Can we do this for bloatware? :) https://www.bloomberg.com/...
  • @neil_chilson Neil Chilson on x
    Up next: Blue Apron and Hungry Root cannot bundle recipes AND ingredients in the same meal kit. It's for your own good, people. https://twitter.com/...
  • @carnage4life Dare Obasanjo on x
    Trying to picture buying a new iPhone and being dumped into the App Store on turning it on because antitrust law bans default apps on your phone. Will users consider this a better experience? Will people be mad when Apple search ads revenue booms? So many questions. https://twitt…
  • @johnpaczkowski John Paczkowski on x
    So much for “it just works” https://twitter.com/...
  • @benedictevans Benedict Evans on x
    I do have a general thesis on regulation that utterly stupid laws like this are actually less of a problem, because they can't be implemented at all. The thing to watch are complex messes like cookie laws, that can implemented and cause lots of low level aggravation every day.
  • @harrymccracken Harry McCracken on x
    Not sure that this would solve any of the real issues relating to the App Store economy. https://www.bloomberg.com/...
  • @benedictevans Benedict Evans on x
    What purpose is solved by proposals this foolish? It's another ‘senator, we sell ads’ moment
  • @benedictevans Benedict Evans on x
    Would it come with a command line or would you have to buy that once you'd turned on the phone? https://twitter.com/...
  • @alecstapp Alec Stapp on x
    I differ slightly with @mattyglesias on the solution. Apple should change commissions to 30% for games and 0% for non-game apps. Games make up about 80% of App Store revenue anyway and 30% commission is industry standard (see Xbox/Playstation/Nintendo) https://twitter.com/...
  • @alecstapp Alec Stapp on x
    .@mattyglesias has the correct take on Apple & the App Store: Apple's conduct isn't illegal under current law and legislative proposals to make it illegal would likely do more harm than good. But Apple executives are making a mistake in how they currently run the App Store. https…