/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

How Taiwan's biggest chip maker TSMC is caught in a tough spot, forced to heed the dictates of Trump's tech policy, while trying to keep many customers in China

New York Times Raymond Zhong

Context & Ripple Effects

In October 2020, TSMC sat at the exact fault line of the first Trump-era tech restrictions: Washington's export controls bound the foundry's hands, while a large share of its customer base sat in China. The company had to comply with US policy without formally abandoning the buyers that helped build its scale.

That squeeze did not ease — it compounded. By early 2025, Trump was calling TSMC's business 'stolen' and the company was rushing to avoid tariffs, even convening its board in Arizona for the first time (TSMC's Arizona board meeting amid tariff pressure). In between, chairman Mark Liu publicly argued that US semiconductor localization would not improve supply-chain resilience (Mark Liu's case against forced localization), and analysts traced how the US push to cut dependency on Taiwanese chips reshaped TSMC's long-term business (the long-term impact of US dependency reduction).

First-order effects

  • TSMC must comply with Trump-era export controls, directly constraining which Chinese customers can buy its most advanced chips and putting that revenue at risk.
  • Chinese chip buyers face immediate loss of access to leading-edge foundry capacity, forcing them toward domestic alternatives or older process nodes.

Second-order effects

  • Washington's dependency concerns push TSMC into US-based manufacturing commitments — culminating in the Arizona board meeting and tariff-avoidance efforts — while Liu argues the localization push does not actually improve resilience.
  • China responds by hardening its own ecosystem, from domestic equipment requirements for new fab capacity to state-backed venture funds for early-stage hard-tech startups.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, the semiconductor supply chain structurally bifurcates: one US-aligned network built around TSMC's American fabs, and a parallel Chinese stack built on domestic equipment and design — with TSMC permanently positioned as the asset both sides try to capture or contain.
  • Taiwan's outsized economic role, visible in its own election politics over whether chips crowd out other sectors, becomes inseparable from great-power technology policy rather than a commercial matter.

The trend: Semiconductor manufacturing is splitting along US-China geopolitical lines, with TSMC as the single point both powers are trying to pull into their own orbit.

Discussion

  • @hkanji Hussein Kanji on x
    Chip making relies on American tools and know-how, which gives officials in Washington the power of life and death over semiconductor buyers and suppliers anywhere on the planet https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @gavinsbaker Gavin Baker on x
    Taiwan as the new Arrakis. And the most poetic description I've ever read of semiconductor manufacturing, which is absolutely the closest thing to magic in this world. https://www.nytimes.com/... https://twitter.com/...
  • @nytimesbusiness @nytimesbusiness on x
    The U.S. campaign against Huawei has forced TSMC to turn against one of its biggest customers https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @wearytolove Austin H. Wang on x
    The translation is gold. “A hundred thousand youths, a hundred thousand livers, shift by shift TSMC is saving Taiwan” https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @nytimesbusiness @nytimesbusiness on x
    “China has virtually no room for maneuver,” the head of technology research at New Street Research said. “The U.S. definitely has the upper hand in the struggle.” https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @zhonggg Raymond Zhong on x
    People in Taiwan have long seen China's reliance on Taiwanese-made chips as a bulwark against military aggression. But how much longer will that be true if the U.S. continues blocking Chinese companies from working with global chip makers? https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @chinausfocus @chinausfocus on x
    “The United States and China are wrestling to lead the world in cutting-edge technologies. But the real wizardry that makes those advancements possible is being performed on a yam-shaped island that sits between them,” reports @nytimes. https://ow.ly/...
  • @jaygoldberg @jaygoldberg on x
    Really good overview on the TSMC/Huawei US/China situation in the NY Time today. With a quote from yours truly. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @jchengwsj Jonathan Cheng on x
    In the high-stakes tech fight, Taiwanese chipmaker TSMC had been playing Finland: a sometime friend to both feuding giants. But that is not the way the tech world works anymore. “China has virtually no room for maneuver.” @zhonggg from a yam-shaped island. https://www.nytimes.com…