Clearview AI

A 2026 CBP contract to search more than 60 billion public images marks Clearview AI’s shift from scraping-driven controversy toward federal use.

Who they are

Clearview AI is a facial-recognition company whose coverage centers on its claimed scraping of billions of online photos and the use of its search tool by law enforcement and other clients. It appears in stories as both a supplier of identification technology to agencies including the FBI, ICE and now US Customs and Border Protection, and as a target of challenges from platforms, privacy regulators and people whose biometric data it collected.

The recent arc

Coverage was most concentrated in the early controversy years, with sustained peaks in 2021Q3 and 2021Q4 after the 2020 disclosures that Clearview claimed to have scraped more than 3 billion images from sites including Facebook and YouTube. Headlines documented Apple disabling its developer account, Facebook and YouTube sending cease-and-desist letters, and regulators in Canada, the UK and Australia challenging the company’s practices; the UK ICO’s provisional £17 million-plus fine was a prominent late-2021 development.

More recently, the storyline has moved from platform access and privacy enforcement to legal resolution and government sales. A June 2024 proposed settlement offered people whose faces are in the database a collective 23% equity stake, valued at roughly $52 million, to resolve twelve class actions. Hoan Ton-That then stepped down as president in February 2025 while remaining a board member, and the latest headline reports CBP’s one-year contract for tactical targeting and counter-network analysis using a database of more than 60 billion public images.

The tension

The enduring tension is between Clearview’s expanding public-safety and federal-market pitch and the legitimacy of the image collection underpinning it. Facebook, YouTube and Google represent the platform side of that conflict: Meta and Google held back unknown-person recognition over privacy concerns, creating room for Clearview and PimEyes, while Facebook and YouTube objected to Clearview’s scraping. Litigation alleges unlawful collection of biometric facial geometry, even as CBP’s procurement shows government demand for the resulting capability.

Why it matters

If federal adoption continues after years in which controversy and lawsuits reportedly constrained major contracts, Clearview could become a consequential test case for whether contested internet-scraped biometric datasets can be normalized in government operations. The settlement proposal and leadership transition suggest the company is trying to manage that constraint, but the durability of its trajectory remains uncertain because legal, regulatory and platform opposition are tied to the core data-collection model rather than a peripheral product issue.

Related: Facebook · YouTube · Google · A look at Clearview AI, a facial recognition app claiming it scraped 3 · Docs show Best Buy and Walmart, alongside ICE, DOJ, and FBI, are among