/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

After booming demand during the pandemic and a rapid inventory build-up in 2022, Intel, Nvidia, SMIC, and TSMC face a sudden downturn, perplexing analysts

After dealing with booming demand and global shortages since the start of the pandemic, the semiconductor industry is facing a sudden downturn.

Financial Times Richard Waters

Context & Ripple Effects

The industry arrives at this downturn from the opposite extreme: the chip shortage of 2021, driven by stockpiling amid US-China trade tensions and a focus on higher-margin cutting-edge chips, pushed Intel, Nvidia, SMIC, and TSMC into a rapid inventory build-up through 2022. By mid-August, analysts were calling it an inventory correction that could be the worst downturn in a decade as global demand faded.

The puzzle for analysts is speed: an industry that spent two years unable to supply enough chips now faces swelling stockpiles within months of the build-up, with falling lead times already visible by year-end.

First-order effects

  • Intel, Nvidia, SMIC, and TSMC are absorbing the direct hit: inventories built during the shortage era now sit unsold as consumer demand cuts spending, pressuring revenue and utilization across all four.

Second-order effects

  • The demand drop collides with the manufacturing capacity added during the boom, forcing chipmakers to cut output and capex — a squeeze that later shows up as TSMC, Intel, and peers slowing their expansion plans in Japan and Malaysia on lackluster older-chip demand.

Third-order effects

  • If the cycle follows the pattern some analysts saw by November 2022 — a sharp downturn with a possible bottom near — the structural lesson is that pandemic-era double ordering and stockpiling amplify both directions of the cycle, leaving the industry to re-learn capacity discipline between shortage and glut.

The trend: Semiconductors are swinging from shortage to glut faster than ever, as pandemic-era stockpiling turns the classic chip cycle into sharper, shorter booms and busts.

Discussion

  • @parismarx Paris Marx on x
    lmao, right on schedule https://twitter.com/...
  • @irvingswisher Skanda Amarnath on x
    Relevance of heterogeneity can't be understated. Semiconductor industry moving further into gluts but still not where shortages were most inflationary. How much did hot 2020 demand for electronics actually set off shortages elsewhere (vs other causes)? https://www.ft.com/... http…
  • @cjlemire @cjlemire on x
    Further fuel for my speculation that the CHIPS and Science Act won't do much to affect the supply of actual chips. Semis have always been a cyclical business. https://www.ft.com/...
  • @defcon_5 @defcon_5 on x
    TL;dr: Covid hoarding has accentuated the typical boom-bust chip cycle... and supply-chain issues still exist bc Covid still exists. US chipmakers hit by sudden downturn after pandemic boom https://www.ft.com/...
  • @leee_harris Lee Harris on x
    After Congress passed $52 billion CHIPS subsidy: -Micron, which had said it would invest $40b in the U.S. this decade, announced it will cut capital spending -Intel cut its capital spending plans by $4b, but predicts a “growing dividend” for shareholders https://www.ft.com/...
  • @silvermanjacob Jacob Silverman on x
    Sounds like the CHIPS Act is turning into a subsidy for semiconductor companies that are missing revenue targets and slashing budgets, rather than investing in new domestic fabs. Intel is still promising shareholders a “strong and growing dividend.” https://www.ft.com/...
  • @irvingswisher Skanda Amarnath on x
    I would argue that the focus on buybacks (the symptom) should be reallocated towards whether firms follow through on their capex commitments. Among the objectives of these subsidies is to help crowd-in and secure additional real fixed investment https://twitter.com/...