/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

As Apple is expected to debut a headset in January 2023 and Meta slows VR investments, a look at opportunities for the VR supply chain and other headset makers

(1) One of the keys to the VR industry's rapid growth in the past 2-3 years is Meta sold VR headsets at a loss and aggressively promoted its VR business.

Medium Ming-Chi Kuo

Context & Ripple Effects

The story frames a potential handoff in immersive hardware: Meta's earlier loss-led headset push had helped expand VR, while Apple's anticipated entry offered suppliers and rival device makers another major platform to watch.

Subsequent coverage shows the market did not broaden evenly. The AR/VR funding slump followed, while Meta's share rose above 60% in Q4 2023 even as the overall headset market had declined during the year.

First-order effects

  • Meta's slower VR investment reduces the promotional and below-cost sales support that had accelerated headset adoption, affecting the suppliers and headset makers that benefited from that volume push.
  • Apple's expected headset launch focuses VR supply-chain firms and competing manufacturers on a prospective second large-scale customer and platform ecosystem.

Second-order effects

  • The later funding decline indicates that the prospect of Apple's entry was not, on its own, enough to sustain financing for AR/VR startups, narrowing the near-term field of independent device and software challengers.
  • Meta's subsequent market-share gain concentrated demand around one incumbent, giving suppliers less evidence that a broad base of headset makers would replace Meta-led volume.

Third-order effects

  • Meta's later cancellation of a premium mixed-reality headset and planned AR-glasses production suggest that competition may shift from pursuing every headset tier to selecting form factors and price points more carefully.
  • If that pattern persists, the XR supply chain will be shaped less by blanket headset subsidies and more by the product-roadmap choices of a small number of platform owners.

The trend: Immersive computing is becoming a more selective, platform-led hardware market, with investment and supplier demand following a few companies' chosen form factors.

Discussion

  • @anshelsag Anshel Sag on x
    @SadlyItsBradley Ming-Chi's entire worldview is Apple, too, so I'd take that with a grain of salt. ByteDance is eating Meta and Snap's ad dollars. The dollars aren't disappearing, they're just shifting. Last time I checked, ByteDance still owns Pico.
  • @lucasmtny Lucas Matney on x
    I think a lot of industry followers would strongly disagree with the very first paragraph... every facet of the VR industry is currently propped up by Meta's spending. https://twitter.com/... https://twitter.com/...
  • @mingchikuo @mingchikuo on x
    (1/2) Updates & predictions for higher-end Meta Quest 2 Pro: 1. Reiterating adoption of mini-LED displays & 2P Pancake for marked visual improvements. 2. VR & AR (video see-thru) support. 3. Adoption of about 16 cameras (10 for headset & 6 for two controllers (3 for each)).
  • @mingchikuo @mingchikuo on x
    Meta's metaverse hardware/headset business slows down. 1. Meta cuts shipment forecasts by 40% for 2022 (from 10-11 mn to 7-8 mn units). 2. Meta holds off on all new headset/AR/MR hardware projects after 2024.
  • @tailosivetech @tailosivetech on x
    Standby for: the headset has been delayed til WWDC23 due to supply chain issues https://twitter.com/...
  • @johnrobb John Robb on x
    Note: 15 years after the iPhone came out, there were 6.6 billion smartphone users.
  • @johnrobb John Robb on x
    “the headset is the most complicated product Apple has ever designed” NOTE: adding VR to an AR headset is a mistake/distraction https://arstechnica.com/...
  • @tsukinune Tsuki on x
    @SadlyItsBradley The big issue IMO is the same as 2020: Meta has too much breathing room vs. competitors, and Cambria means they can afford to make product mistakes as Quest 2 continues to be what the most consumers buy. That is the product that would need disruption (re: Pico Ne…
  • @hrafntho Hrafn Thorisson on x
    @SadlyItsBradley They got rich fast by operating unsustainably. Moving fast comes at a cost, over time weakening competive advantages, eroding revenue sources, risking future growth and amassing all kinds of issues. They seem to have realized some of it, though, given their new v…
  • @tsukinune Tsuki on x
    @SadlyItsBradley I see there being multiple players but IMO looks to be converging on duplicity in terms of market share: Meta and ByteDance, but there's still many barriers that need to broken (esp. platform/software) for us to be free of their domination (which I wish would hap…
  • @choo_hehimlvl3 @choo_hehimlvl3 on x
    @SadlyItsBradley It feels like there may be a misunderstanding. I believe we're seeing a core business shift for Meta, not just a recession, away from primarily ads to primarily selling metadata. Correlated, non-personalized data can be a high value asset.
  • @sadlyitsbradley Brad Lynch on x
    @Tsukinune The issue is this industry has been so tiny, that people who bought in can't see the long term with multiple players in the space Meta is large. But I see their “domination” as a thing of the past. This industry is finally maturing
  • @tsukinune Tsuki on x
    @SadlyItsBradley If I was to bet on anyone's benefit from reduced orders it's BD/Pico as they have the closest product, but I also have trouble believing Kuo's conclusion that Meta's 11>8M units shipped this year will have such an impact. Even the 8M puts them so far ahead it end…
  • @sadlyitsbradley Brad Lynch on x
    @Tsukinune I don't see meta in a dire situation at all. They made smart investments to prepare for a time like this
  • @tsukinune Tsuki on x
    @SadlyItsBradley I still highly, highly doubt we will see a future mainline Quest device go above ~500 USD. Like The Information said in their roadmap leak, if anything they seem fully prepared to go the Microsoft-Xbox route and just continually write off the hardware segment.
  • @sadlyitsbradley Brad Lynch on x
    If the core business = what engages investment: Valve could be considered in a healthier position. “Watch this space” https://twitter.com/...
  • @sadlyitsbradley Brad Lynch on x
    Ming-Chi Kuo calls the upcoming years as the start of the “Post-Meta era” He says: The sustainability of an ADs focused business is dropping which slows the investments they've been making This makes price models like the Quest 2 much harder - it crutches on success of ads biz ht…
  • @scobleizer Robert Scoble on x
    Although he misses at least one company that's working on VR/AR in the post meta era: Tesla. I'm talking to another one today: Amazon.
  • @scobleizer Robert Scoble on x
    Kuo's analysis is right on. https://twitter.com/...