/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

An unfixable flaw in nearly all Intel chips released in last five years allows sophisticated attackers access to mask ROM of its chipsets and microprocessors

Converged Security and Management Engine flaw may jeopardize Intel's root of trust.  —  Virtually all Intel chips released …

Ars Technica Dan Goodin

Context & Ripple Effects

This is the latest entry in a decade-long pattern around Intel's embedded management silicon. In 2017 the company patched a remote exploit affecting chips back to 2008 with Active Management Technology enabled (chips from 2008–2017), after advisories from HP and Lenovo; in 2018 it fixed longstanding Management Engine flaws but left the first three Core generations unpatched (first three Core generations).

What makes the CSME disclosure different is scope and permanence: earlier flaws lived in patchable firmware, while this one sits in mask ROM burned into the chip, targeting the very root of trust those earlier patches relied on. It converts Intel's security architecture from a fixable layer into an inherited liability across five years of shipping silicon.

First-order effects

  • Enterprises running recent Intel fleets cannot patch their way out — mitigations can only reduce exposure, so every machine with an affected CSME carries the risk for its full service life.

Second-order effects

  • Security teams lose the assumption that Intel's on-die root of trust is trustworthy, strengthening procurement cases for AMD and ARM-based platforms and pushing buyers toward external attestation and hardware security modules.

Third-order effects

  • If mask ROM roots of trust are structurally unfixable, industry trust migrates toward verifiable, externally auditable attestation rather than vendor-burned secrets — and later disclosures like the 2020 secure-enclave leak suggest the management-engine attack surface keeps yielding findings.

The trend: Intel's embedded management engines have become a recurring, hard-to-patch attack surface, steadily eroding confidence in vendor-controlled roots of trust and pushing enterprise security toward external attestation.

Discussion

  • @davidgerard David Gerard on x
    Intel x86 Root of Trust vulnerability in ROM: loss of trust https://blog.ptsecurity.com/ ... affecting DRM, fTPM, and Intel Identity Protection
  • @supernerdland @supernerdland on x
    Intel's Management Engine I believe will go down as one of modern tech biggest blunders https://www.theregister.co.uk/ ...
  • @techlinkedyt TechLinked on x
    “fix this thing by buying a new one” https://www.zdnet.com/...
  • @kennwhite Kenn White on x
    Deep dive here: https://blog.ptsecurity.com/ ...
  • @brianroemmele Brian Roemmele on x
    Some folks knew this was a potential flaw years ago. Although difficult to duplicate—it is here and known. https://twitter.com/...
  • @jollyroger Roger Chang on x
    “Intel CSME bug is worse than previously thought. Researchers say a full patch requires replacing hardware. Only the latest Intel 10th generation CPUs are not affected.” https://www.zdnet.com/...
  • @raptorcompsys Raptor Computing Sys on x
    This is what we've been predicting for years. “A single key is used for an entire generation of Intel chipsets.” “... extracting this key is only a matter of time.” AMD mandates similar PSP in all CPUs inc. Epyc / Ryzen. Switch to #OpenPOWER today! https://www.theregister.co.uk/ …
  • @profwoodward Alan Woodward on x
    Cast your minds back to when this bug was apparently fixed in Intel's firmware. Turns out it's not actually fixable. You need physical access to exploit but even so unless you've got 10th generation Intel chip it will persist https://www.ptsecurity.com/...
  • @theregister @theregister on x
    ICYMI: Pretty fun find in the lowest levels of Intel's chipset security. There's a small window of opportunity to hijack the Management Engine, when a computer turns on, for instance, and potentially acquire crucial crypto-keys from the hardware https://www.theregister.co.uk/ ...
  • @p3b7_ Charles Guillemet on x
    Unfixable vulnerability found on Intel chips. The ROM of CSME is vulnerable which breaks the root of Trust. “The vulnerability allows extracting the Chipset Key and manipulating part of the hardware key and the process of its generation.” http://blog.ptsecurity.com/... https://tw…
  • @dragosr @dragosr on x
    Positive Technologies continue to point out problems with Intel's Management Engine. This one is interesting, it's a boot race condition that can be used to hijack it via DMA. https://www.theregister.co.uk/ ...
  • @nixcraft @nixcraft on x
    Color me surprised. Intel CPUs and chipsets have a concerning flaw that's unfixable. Intel x86 Root of Trust: loss of trust https://blog.ptsecurity.com/ ...
  • @kennwhite Kenn White on x
    “[B]ecause this vulnerability allows a compromise at the hardware level, it destroys the chain of trust for the platform as a whole”. Great work by @_markel___ and team @ptsecurity_uk, and nice write-up by @dangoodin001. https://twitter.com/...
  • @kyhwana @kyhwana on x
    Chain of trust in intel CPUs destroyed. Oh well. https://arstechnica.com/... Just infosec things
  • @dangoodin001 Dan Goodin on x
    While attacks would be hard, the breadth of the impact would be huge. That means the flaw would likely be exploited only by nation states or other extremely advanced hackers. Other details here: https://arstechnica.com/... 6/x
  • @dangoodin001 Dan Goodin on x
    This vulnerability resides in mask ROM that's used to boot the very 1st piece of firmware used by the Converged Security and Management, which implements the firmware-based Trusted Platform Module, authentication of UEFI BIOS & several other silicon-based security features. 1/x h…