Intel's US pay disclosure report shows 26% of white men are in the top tier, making at least $208K, while less than 10% of black employees are in the top tier
and it's not pretty! https://www.bloomberg.com/... pic.twitter.com/VSqQPpjsys Fatima Goss Graves / @fgossgraves : Intel shared its pay data not just with the EEOC (as companies now are required to do) but also with the public. It's the sort of transparency that invites accountability. That invites change. https://www.bloomberg.com/... Jeff Green / @jeffagreen : WARTS AND ALL: The salary information isn't flattering... and is something @intel Intel didn't have to share - but the challenge is laid for other companies to show this new EEOC data on pay/race/gender. https://www.bloomberg.com/... via @business #genderequity #CorpGov #transparency Romy Varghese / @romyvarghese : “Intel's disclosure shows that these disparities can't be fixed simply by raising the salaries of women and minorities.” https://www.bloomberg.com/... via @business Paige Smith / @paigesmithnews : Intel is the first company to actually disclose the pay data it turned over to the EEOC, via @JeffAGreen Some notes: -38% of lowest-earning professionals are women -26% of white men are top earners -White and Asian males have the highest overall salaries https://www.bloomberg.com/... Jose Flores / @josehfloresmd : Among 52 top executives at @intel, earning >$208,000—29 are white M, 11 Asian M and 8 white F. The remaining tally is 1 each for Asian F, Hispanic F, black F and black M, and 0 Hispanic M among executives in that top tier. https://www.bloomberg.com/... pic.twitter.com/x6EolmmM0h Max Abelson / @maxabelson : We've been waiting years — actual years! — for a company to do this. Cool that @Intel bit the bullet and went first. Meanwhile literally every other public company is still keeping this info private https://www.bloomberg.com/... Rebecca Greenfield / @rzgreenfield : We asked Intel: Why share these unflattering numbers? “It's difficult to really fix what you aren't being transparent about.” Other companies should follow. https://www.bloomberg.com/...
Bloomberg
Context & Ripple Effects
Intel spent the 2010s building a public identity around workforce diversity: a $300M pledge in 2015 to diversify its US staff by 2020, hiring milestones tracked annually, and a [[a:935060|declaration in 2018 that it had hit "full US workforce representation" two years ahead of schedule]]. What that reporting measured was headcount, never what people were paid.
This disclosure closes that gap — uncomfortably. By publishing the same pay/race/gender data it now must file with the EEOC, Intel shows the limits of its own milestone: top-tier pay (≥$208K) flows heavily to white men while women cluster in the lowest tiers. The move also stands in sharp contrast to peers like Palantir and Oracle, which have hidden their diversity statistics behind trade-secret claims.
First-order effects
Intel hands regulators, employees, and advocates like Fatima Goss Graves a concrete benchmark — fewer than 10% of Black employees in the top pay tier versus 26% of white men — that its earlier representation wins did not address.
Second-order effects
Companies still withholding EEOC-style data lose cover: Intel has demonstrated the numbers can be published without legal exemption, raising the cost of the trade-secrets defense and daring rivals to match the transparency.
Third-order effects
If voluntary publication spreads, the accountability frontier shifts from hiring quotas to pay distribution — forcing tech firms to explain why diverse intake, like Intel's 43.3% female-or-underrepresented hiring stretch in 2015, fails to reach the top of the pay ladder.
The trend: Tech's diversity accountability is migrating from headline hiring counts toward disclosed pay distributions, with the EEOC's new reporting requirements giving transparency advocates a lever.
I applaud Intel for taking this important & courageous step toward greater pay equity and I encourage others to do the same. Many employers are unaware of disparities in their own pay & hiring practices until they take a closer look at the data. #equalpay https://bloom.bg/2PBJCFG
Intel's Gender Pay Gap Data Highlights Challenges in Big Tech - Bloomberg Thanks so much @intel for daring to make your company vulnerable! Transparency is the 1st necessary step to mending the gender and race pay gap. #PFA @NETWORKLobby https://www.bloomberg.com/...
More companies need to be transparent about pay disparities and how it disproportionately impacts women and people of color - not just share PR-approved meaningless stats. https://www.bloomberg.com/...
Intel shared the most detailed salary information by race and gender that any company has EVER made public. It may be the ONLY time we ever get info like this, a fascinating window into company pay. https://www.bloomberg.com/...
85% of Intel's top earning professionals are men. Women are only 26.5% of the 51K workforce. Kudos to @intel for the public release of their data & for setting goals “to help underrepresented groups get promoted into more lucrative roles & keep them there.” https://www.bloomberg.…
1 in 4 white men who works at Intel in the U.S. makes at least $208,000 per year. Less than 10% of black employees make that much. https://www.bloomberg.com/... pic.twitter.com/Z5Shx4i5df
BIG EXCLUSIVE for ya: Intel gave us the most detailed salary information by race and gender that any company has ever shared —and it's not pretty! https://www.bloomberg.com/... pic.twitter.com/VSqQPpjsys
Intel shared its pay data not just with the EEOC (as companies now are required to do) but also with the public. It's the sort of transparency that invites accountability. That invites change. https://www.bloomberg.com/...
WARTS AND ALL: The salary information isn't flattering... and is something @intel Intel didn't have to share - but the challenge is laid for other companies to show this new EEOC data on pay/race/gender. https://www.bloomberg.com/... via @business #genderequity #CorpGov #transpa…
“Intel's disclosure shows that these disparities can't be fixed simply by raising the salaries of women and minorities.” https://www.bloomberg.com/... via @business
Intel is the first company to actually disclose the pay data it turned over to the EEOC, via @JeffAGreen Some notes: -38% of lowest-earning professionals are women -26% of white men are top earners -White and Asian males have the highest overall salaries https://www.bloomberg.com…
Among 52 top executives at @intel, earning >$208,000—29 are white M, 11 Asian M and 8 white F. The remaining tally is 1 each for Asian F, Hispanic F, black F and black M, and 0 Hispanic M among executives in that top tier. https://www.bloomberg.com/... pic.twitter.com/x6EolmmM0h
We've been waiting years — actual years! — for a company to do this. Cool that @Intel bit the bullet and went first. Meanwhile literally every other public company is still keeping this info private https://www.bloomberg.com/...
We asked Intel: Why share these unflattering numbers? “It's difficult to really fix what you aren't being transparent about.” Other companies should follow. https://www.bloomberg.com/...