As millions pay for premium subscriptions to have a “clean” digital media experience, privacy and freedom from advertising are gradually becoming luxury goods
A decade ago, an internet video start-up called Hulu boldly declared an end to the era of paid TV.
New York TimesKevin Roose
Context & Ripple Effects
Hulu built this story in three acts: in 2015 it launched a commercial-free plan at $12 per month after weeks of reports that an ad-free option was coming, and by 2018 James Murdoch said roughly half of its 20 million subscribers were paying $11.99 to skip commercials rather than $7.99 to sit through them. That split was the proof point for a broader idea — that escaping advertising is a product feature you can charge extra for.
First-order effects
Hulu's ad-free subscribers effectively pay a ~$4 monthly premium purely to remove ads, making freedom from advertising one of Hulu's highest-margin upsells rather than a courtesy.
Subscribers who stay on the cheaper tier accept more ad load in exchange for a lower price, so the same catalog is now sold two ways: attention or cash.
Second-order effects
Rival streaming services face pressure to copy the two-tier structure, because leaving ad avoidance unpriced forfeits revenue from exactly the subscribers willing to pay most.
Advertisers gain a self-sorting audience: people who won't pay to opt out are concentrated on the ad tier, which raises the value of ad-supported inventory even as the paying tier shrinks it.
Third-order effects
If the pattern holds across digital media, an ad-free experience hardens into a class marker — those who can pay escape tracking and interruptions while everyone else's attention subsidizes the service, extending the dynamic Vox documented when social platforms began turning expected functionality into paid perks (pay-to-play features like security and support).
The economics may not hold one way: Antenna's 2024 finding that 56% of new streaming subscribers chose the cheaper ad-supported tier suggests price sensitivity pulls users back toward ads, forcing services to treat ad-free less as the future and more as one rung on a pricing ladder.
The trend: Digital media is splitting into a two-tier market where freedom from advertising and tracking is priced as a premium feature, with the ad-supported majority funding the subscription minority.
“Today's internet is full of premium subscriptions, walled gardens and virtual V.I.P. rooms, all of which promise a cleaner, more pleasant experience than their free counterparts,” writes Kevin Roose for @NYTmag https://www.nytimes.com/...
“Free” was always a lie. If you aren't paying for the product, you are the product — and you're paying with your attention, data, or worse. As Joan Didion said, people with self-respect know the price of things. https://www.nytimes.com/...
Today's internet is like the real world: Have money? Here's a premium, rich-people-only experience for you. Can't afford to pay? Your internet comes riddled with predatory ads, scam offers and rampant misinformation https://www.nytimes.com/...
It is kinda interesting to watch the idea that privacy is a ‘premium good’ go mainstream in NYT articles. The tech world has been talking about this inversion as obvious for 10+ years.. i.e. this is me making this point in @jeffjarvis book in 2010! https://www.nytimes.com/... pi…
The tech investor Marc Andreessen once said that in the future, there will be two types of people: “people who tell computers what to do, and people who are told by computers what to do.” https://twitter.com/...
“If privacy becomes an expensive add-on, the rich and the poor will have very different experiences of the internet.” Great write-up of where this trend is going. https://twitter.com/...
I wrote an essay for the @NYTmag's tech and design issue about the “luxury internet” — a kind of digital farm-to-table movement for people who want to pay to escape the clunky, predatory free internet and inhabit tasteful, private spaces instead. https://www.nytimes.com/...
How freedom from advertising, not just privacy, is a luxury good ‘in the future, there will be two types of people: “people who tell computers what to do, and people who are told by computers what to do”’ https://www.nytimes.com/... https://twitter.com/...
Thorough look at WeChat, the original “super app.” Timely article as Yahoo! Japan and LINE merge and aspire to create a similarly all-encompassing platform. https://twitter.com/...
China's internet is flowering. And one of its anchors: WeChat. “To spend any amount of time in China today is to understand why it's said that people ‘live on WeChat,’” writes Yiren Lu. https://www.nytimes.com/...
WeChat started as a chat app, but now it's a superapp with more than a billion monthly active users. China shops on WeChat, pays on WeChat, reads news on WeChat, lives all aspects of life on WeChat. Welcome to the completely integrated WeChat internet https://nyti.ms/2Ody8aG
“As the Chinese internet becomes the WeChat internet, WeChat will increasingly be treated as a public utility, subject to more...direct interference. This is the cost that PRC companies have always paid, but the WeChat internet arguably exacerbates it...” https://www.nytimes.com/…
“Until now, infrastructural innovation has flowed mostly from the West to China.... The so-called WeChat model may be the first time things are going in reverse.” https://www.nytimes.com/...
For decades, the West shaped the internet: from design to programming languages to wireless protocols. For the first time, a Chinese concept is taking on that role. This is the age of the completely integrated WeChat internet https://www.nytimes.com/...
Identity & payments & distribution is the path to superappdom or a new internet. If you care about where the consumer internet is going this is a must read https://www.nytimes.com/...
Great WeChat summary. Everyone should read. Integrated payment + communication is key. To get there in US, we need Fed to deliver on its recent faster payments initiative. Both the credit card rails and the ACH rails distract from innovation (& represent regulatory capture). http…
“Perhaps the deepest shift has been a shift in attitudes: the breaking of a spell that seemed to protect Silicon Valley from distrust,” writes @billwasik in @NYTmag https://www.nytimes.com/...
Our Tech & Design issue cover this week: So, the internet didn't turn out the way we hoped. What now? @kevinroose on premium internet: https://www.nytimes.com/... @jamiekeiles on fandom: https://www.nytimes.com/... Yiren Lu on China's superconnected internet: https://www.nytimes.…
The most bracing reality about the internet today is that, after years of pretending that “the internet” means the same thing to all people everywhere, that fiction has finally become impossible to sustain https://www.nytimes.com/...