/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Intel and Micron to end NAND flash partnership after the introduction of 3rd gen 3D NAND in late 2018/early 2019, will continue 3D XPoint memory collaboration

LAS VEGAS, NV — The long-running partnership between Intel and Micron for the development and manufacturing of NAND flash memory will soon come to an end.

AnandTech Billy Tallis

Context & Ripple Effects

The IntelMicron memory alliance has been the vehicle for both companies' biggest storage bets: the 3D NAND program announced in 2015 to triple SSD capacity and the 3D XPoint chip unveiled mid-2015 as a flash alternative already in production. This announcement splits those two tracks — joint NAND development and manufacturing ends once 3rd-generation 3D NAND ships in late 2018/early 2019, while the XPoint collaboration continues.

The split lands just as the partners are still shipping jointly built product: their QLC NAND, launched in May 2018, trades endurance for lower cost per bit. What follows in the corpus makes the split look like the first domino — both companies eventually abandoned the very technology they chose to keep collaborating on.

First-order effects

  • After 3rd-gen 3D NAND, Intel loses its co-development and co-manufacturing stake in NAND and must source or build its flash roadmap separately, while Micron gains sole control of the shared NAND development and manufacturing line.
  • Both companies keep 3D XPoint as a going joint effort, leaving Lehi-era shared R&D as the surviving piece of the alliance.

Second-order effects

  • With separate NAND roadmaps, Intel and Micron shift from partners to direct competitors in the same flash market they jointly supplied, competing on cost-per-bit curves like the QLC trade-off they co-launched.
  • The retained XPoint collaboration now carries the full strategic weight of the relationship — and when it underdelivers commercially, each company has an independent exit path rather than a binding joint commitment.

Third-order effects

  • That exit path gets used: Micron ceases all 3D XPoint R&D in 2021 and lists the Lehi fab for sale, and Intel winds down Optane in 2022 with a $559M inventory impairment — the sixth non-core business CEO Pat Gelsinger has shed — showing the split enabled each side to unwind the specialty-memory bet on its own schedule.
  • The pattern points to memory alliances as transitional vehicles: partners pool capital to cross a process transition like 3D NAND, then decouple once each can fund its own roadmap — and successor collaborations inherit none of the original's durability.

The trend: Semiconductor memory partnerships formed to share the cost of a process transition tend to dissolve at the transition's end, leaving each partner free to pursue — or abandon — the follow-on technologies independently.