/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Analyst: iPhone 8 and 8 Plus accounted for 16% of all US iPhone sales in the past quarter, compared to 43% for 7 and 7 Plus during the same period last year

Purchase data from Consumer Intelligence Research Partners (CIRP) suggests that the iPhone 8 is selling in smaller numbers than an ‘S’ model.

9to5Mac Ben Lovejoy

Context & Ripple Effects

CIRP's purchase data puts the iPhone 8 and 8 Plus at just 16% of US iPhone sales for the quarter, against 43% for the iPhone 7 pair over the same stretch a year earlier — and Canalys' shipment counts point the same direction, with 11.9M iPhone 8 units shipped in Q3 2017 versus 14M iPhone 7 units the year before. The obvious suspect is timing: the iPhone X was weeks away, giving upgraders a reason to hold off on an 'S'-class refresh.

The follow-on coverage confirms the deferral read — the iPhone X took roughly 30% of US sales in its first 30 days once it landed — and the pattern recurs in later cycles, with the cheaper XR becoming the best-selling iPhone at 39% of US sales and the small, lower-priced 12 mini stalling at 6% while the standard 12 took 27%. Where Apple places a model on the price ladder keeps deciding which one carries the quarter.

First-order effects

  • US upgraders deferred 'S'-cycle purchases ahead of the iPhone X launch, leaving the 8 and 8 Plus with under half the share the 7 pair held a year earlier and thinning Apple's near-term unit mix.

Second-order effects

  • Demand that skipped the 8 resurfaced as X sales once availability began, so Apple's revenue per sale likely rose even as the entry flagship underperformed — a mix shift rather than lost demand.

Third-order effects

  • The recurring split across cycles — XR dominating at 39%, the 12 mini flopping at 6% beside the standard 12's 27% — points to a durable structure where each iPhone generation is carried by one volume model positioned at the right price, not by even distribution across the lineup.

The trend: US iPhone demand is consolidating each cycle around a single high-volume model whose success hinges on its price-tier placement, with premium flagships and undersized or overpriced variants ceding share.