/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

White House says the $100K H-1B fee will not apply to renewals or existing H-1B holders re-entering the US, only to future applicants in the February lottery

not $100K toll booths. Aaron Reichlin-Melnick / @reichlinmelnick : They need to PUT THIS IN WRITING. Because right now it's anonymous officials versus the actual words in the actual ban on entry that the President signed. Reena Bhardwaj / @reenabhardwaj : Senior White House official tells me “If you are visiting, leaving out of the country or visiting India, they don't need to rush back before Sunday or pay the $100,000 fee. $100,000 is only for new and not current existing it would be holders.” Esther Crawford / @esthercrawford : Weird seeing people who are supposedly champions of startups and Little Tech cheer on the introduction of a $100k for H-1Bs given it'll immediately be cost prohibitive for early-stage startups to hire from that very talented pool. Big Tech can absorb the fees, startups can't. Ege Erdil / @egeerdil2 : this is illegal since the relevant legislation only gives USCIS the authority to charge fees in order to cover costs, and is most likely going to get struck down by the courts in a few months people shouldn't discuss it as if it's a serious policy LinkedIn: Robert Kelchen : The Trump administration says that H-1B holders do not have to get back in the country today to avoid their employers paying a $100,000 fee … Bluesky: Jay Cuthrell / @cuthrell.com : A few thoughts on the chaos of H1-B visa fee hikes via EO on a Friday fudge.org/archive/snea... Elissa Taub / @ejtaub : This regime lies about everything all the time.  The black letter wording of the proclamation relates to all H1B entries.  They could've been more precise, but they're all nitwits and terrible writers.  So I can't advise without proof of what the rumors are.  Simple as that.  [embedded post] @salma-not-hayek : how long till “oh we made a typo we meant $100” [embedded post] @gloriasin : Well that basically kills the H1B visa.  So much for “legal” immigration.  [embedded post] Ken Tindell / @kentindell : Deliberate mental torture of current holders to let them spent hours in fear and panic from to the previous announcement.  [embedded post] Mastodon: Simon Willison / @simon@fedi.simonwillison.net : Leaked memo from Amazon that warns existing H1B holders to avoid travel back into the USA after the September 21st deadline - their lawyers evaluated the new executive order as not just affecting new applications https://www.businessinsider.com/ ...  [images] Forums: Hacker News : New H-1B visa fee will not apply to existing holders, official says r/technology : White House tries to tamp down corporate panic for high-skill visa holders after last-minute overhaul r/economy : New H-1B visa fee will not apply to existing holders, official says r/politics : Trump administration tries to tamp down panic for high-skill visa holders after last-minute overhaul r/india : New H-1B visa fee will not apply to existing holders, official says r/neoliberal : Trump administration tries to tamp down panic for high-skill visa holders after last-minute overhaul

Axios Ben Berkowitz

Discussion

  • @rapidresponse47 @rapidresponse47 on x
    Corporate lawyers and others with agendas are creating a lot of FAKE NEWS around President Trump's H-1B Proclamation, but these are FACTS: 1. The Proclamation does not apply to anyone who has a current visa. 2. The Proclamation only applies to future applicants in the February
  • @joemillerjr Joe Miller on x
    WH official confirms to FT that new H1B fees will apply *only* to new applicants, not current holders or those renewing. Will kick in next cycle. Also it's not an annual fee, but a one-off at time of application.
  • @devahaz Deva Hazarika on x
    We now have an official proclamation that says one thing, an official admin tweet that says another, and a cabinet official saying yet another different thing. Comical execution.
  • @growing_daniel Daniel on x
    It's fun that this executive order was so poorly written that members of the administration are publicly disagreeing about what it means
  • @deedydas Deedy on x
    I spoke to immigration lawyer Sophie Alcorn for an hour to answer the most pressing questions about the new $100k H-1B fee. Sophie's (@Sophie_Alcorn) represented startup founders, employees and employers for over a decade in the Bay Area and is one of the experts on the topic. [i…
  • @hthieblot Hubert Thieblot on x
    If I'm reading this right, the new H-1B law is the biggest win for foreign students in years. Already on F-1/OPT? You're excluded from the $100k fee + face less lottery competition. Foreign-born, U.S.-educated talent can finally stay if they find work. Massive.
  • @speaksamuel Sam Peak on x
    This is how the rollout of the H-1B $100,000 fee has gone thus far: - During the Friday White House Press Conference, the Secretary of Commerce, who has no authority over immigration, was invited to communicate the rollout of the new policy, where he said that it would be an
  • @shakeelhashim Shakeel on x
    Even if this is true, the fact they did not think to clarify this at the time of the announcement is a nice demonstration of this administration's incompetence
  • @pitdesi Sheel Mohnot on x
    Crazy shit. You're left to make the decision: Do you trust this tweet or the official proclamation which says the opposite? Do we trust Lutnick that the fee is yearly or the proclamation (also at odds)
  • @bindureddy Bindu Reddy on x
    MOST PEOPLE DON'T GET IT - FRONTIER TECH RELIES ON THE OUTLIERS We only have one Ilya, one Elon, and one Sergey Brin. We wouldn't have OpenAI, Tesla, or Google if we had banned H1-Bs And no, it is impossible to know who will be the next Elon or Ilya to pay the $100K fees
  • @sidhant Sidhant Sibal on x
    Breaking on H1B Visa $100,000 Fee issue: -This is a one-time fee that applies only to the petition -It ONLY applies to new visas, not renewals or current visa holders -It will first apply in the next upcoming lottery cycle -It does not apply to 2025 lottery winners
  • @simonw Simon Willison on x
    Here's denial that this affects current visa holders from an official “rapid response” White House account
  • @garrytan Garry Tan on x
    This current policy outcome = massive gift to every overseas tech hub. Cities like Vancouver/Toronto will thrive instead of American cities. In the middle of an AI arms race, we're telling builders to build elsewhere. We need American Little Tech to win—not $100K toll booths.
  • @reichlinmelnick Aaron Reichlin-Melnick on x
    They need to PUT THIS IN WRITING. Because right now it's anonymous officials versus the actual words in the actual ban on entry that the President signed.
  • @reenabhardwaj Reena Bhardwaj on x
    Senior White House official tells me “If you are visiting, leaving out of the country or visiting India, they don't need to rush back before Sunday or pay the $100,000 fee. $100,000 is only for new and not current existing it would be holders.”
  • @esthercrawford Esther Crawford on x
    Weird seeing people who are supposedly champions of startups and Little Tech cheer on the introduction of a $100k for H-1Bs given it'll immediately be cost prohibitive for early-stage startups to hire from that very talented pool. Big Tech can absorb the fees, startups can't.
  • @egeerdil2 Ege Erdil on x
    this is illegal since the relevant legislation only gives USCIS the authority to charge fees in order to cover costs, and is most likely going to get struck down by the courts in a few months people shouldn't discuss it as if it's a serious policy
  • @cuthrell.com Jay Cuthrell on bluesky
    A few thoughts on the chaos of H1-B visa fee hikes via EO on a Friday fudge.org/archive/snea...
  • @ejtaub Elissa Taub on bluesky
    This regime lies about everything all the time.  The black letter wording of the proclamation relates to all H1B entries.  They could've been more precise, but they're all nitwits and terrible writers.  So I can't advise without proof of what the rumors are.  Simple as that.  [em…
  • @salma-not-hayek @salma-not-hayek on bluesky
    how long till “oh we made a typo we meant $100” [embedded post]
  • @gloriasin @gloriasin on bluesky
    Well that basically kills the H1B visa.  So much for “legal” immigration.  [embedded post]
  • @kentindell Ken Tindell on bluesky
    Deliberate mental torture of current holders to let them spent hours in fear and panic from to the previous announcement.  [embedded post]
  • r/technology r on reddit
    White House tries to tamp down corporate panic for high-skill visa holders after last-minute overhaul
  • r/economy r on reddit
    New H-1B visa fee will not apply to existing holders, official says
  • r/politics r on reddit
    Trump administration tries to tamp down panic for high-skill visa holders after last-minute overhaul
  • r/india r on reddit
    New H-1B visa fee will not apply to existing holders, official says
  • r/neoliberal r on reddit
    Trump administration tries to tamp down panic for high-skill visa holders after last-minute overhaul