Filing: Intel warns the US taking a 10% stake could cause “adverse reactions”, like in international sales, which made up 76% of revenue in its past fiscal year
Intel on Monday warned of “adverse reactions” from investors, employees and others to the Trump administration taking …
CNBC Chris Eudaily
Related Coverage
- FORM 8-K — On August 22, 2025, Intel Corporation (the “Company") entered into a Warrant … SEC.gov
- Intel warns shareholders that the US government's 10% stake could hurt company's international sales Tom's Hardware
- Intel warns US govt equity stake could disrupt its global business and strategic deals Computerworld
- INTEL CORPORATION — (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Intel
- Intel warns its deal with the US government may be bad for business, while reports claim it won't prevent the fabs being sold off and the whole thing might not be legal, anyway PC Gamer
- Is The US Government A Business Now? The Pomp Letter
- All SEC Filings — Filing Type: — Year: — Date Form Description PDF XBRL Pages — Documents Intel
- Intel Warns Trump's Government Stake Poses ‘Adverse’ Risk to Global Sales WinBuzzer
- Intel says Trump's plan for U.S. stake in company poses business risks Washington Post
- Intel warns US govt stake could impact international sales Capital Brief
- Why Donald Trump has opened the door to ‘state-run capitalism’ Financial Times
- Intel warns of potential business risks related to US government's investment SiliconANGLE
- Hassett Sees Fed Chair Pick Taking ‘Another Few Months’ Bloomberg
- U.S. Could Take Stakes in More Companies, Hassett Says Wall Street Journal
- Skadden Steers Intel in Deal With Trump to Boost Chipmaker Bloomberg Law
- The government's Intel stake is antithetical to American greatness Washington Post
- Trump says government will make deals like Intel stake ‘all day long’ CNBC
- White House's Hassett says U.S. could take stakes in other industries Reuters
- Sources detail Intel's two-week roller-coaster ride, from Trump demanding CEO Lip-Bu Tan step down to the US government becoming Intel's biggest shareholder Wall Street Journal
- I PAID ZERO FOR INTEL, IT IS WORTH APPROXIMATELY 11 BILLION DOLLARS. All goes to the USA. Why are “stupid” people unhappy with that? I will make deals like that for our Country all day long. I will also help those companies that make such lucrative deals with the United States States. … @realDonaldTrump@truthsocial.com
- Intel Warns US Equity Stake Could Trigger ‘Adverse Reactions’ 1 Slashdot
Discussion
-
@bgurley
Bill Gurley
on x
Here's my take. If the government is the “lender of last resort” they should 100% take equity and arguably 100% of the equity. Failed to do this with GM, Goldman Sachs, United (& other airlines). How do you know if they are lender of last resort? The company takes the deal.
-
@scottlincicome
Scott Lincicome
on x
Maybe it goes without saying, but it is bad to have Trump obsessed with - and heavily invested (financially, emotionally, politically) in - Intel's stock price
-
@andrewrsorkin
Andrew Ross Sorkin
on x
Should the govt start taking equity in every start-up for the federal tax incentives we offer? Or Tesla? How about the banks? What about when a state govt offers a tax incentive? Should they get an equity stake in exchange? Board representation? This is a super slippery slope!
-
@scottlincicome
Scott Lincicome
on x
Trump & Hassett say the US government will take more Intel-esque equity stakes in private companies: https://www.cnbc.com/... KH: “So I'm sure that at some point there'll be more transactions, if not in this industry then other industries.” Run for the hills. [image]
-
@catoinstitute
@catoinstitute
on x
The Intel deal isn't “smart” industrial policy. It's government ownership of private enterprise—at a discount, with strings attached, and with politics in the driver's seat. If the deal is repeated in other industries, expect less innovation, more waste, and slower growth. 👇 [ima…
-
@dampedspring
Andy Constan
on x
I don't want the government making deals with private companies for any special treatment. I don't want the government to give money to specific sectors and companies Let them succeed or fail on their own However I really don't want companies to be FORCED to cede shares for
-
@scottlincicome
Scott Lincicome
on x
Seeing a lot of “conservative” commentary on Intel today once again proving Friedman right [image]
-
@scottlincicome
Scott Lincicome
on x
As I just wrote in the @washingtonpost, this stuff is “sure to distort future private decision-making in unknowable ways.” It's bad, bad, bad. [image]
-
@themaxburns
Max Burns
on x
While Democrats twist into pretzels to avoid even the hint of “socialism” in their message, Donald Trump and the @GOP are drafting a list of private companies they'd like to partially nationalize. It really is the upside-down. https://www.cnbc.com/...
-
@bcantrill
Bryan Cantrill
on bluesky
Intel breaking new organizational ground by formalizing the idea of a co-CEO that reports to a (third?) CEO to be named later. — www.intc.com/filings-repo...
-
@kalaka58
Debra
on bluesky
Folks might have a general idea how many businesses Cheeto has bankrupted [embedded post]
-
r/TheBusinessMix
r
on reddit
Intel says Trump deal has risks for shareholders, international sales