/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

A judge issues an injunction blocking key Biden admin officials from contacting social media companies, in a case brought by MO and LA AGs over vaccine posts

The Trump-appointed judge's move could upend years of efforts to enhance coordination between the government and social media companies.

Washington Post Cat Zakrzewski

Discussion

  • @yoyoel.com Yoel Roth on bluesky
    I testified in front of the House Oversight Committee, under oath, about the extraordinary efforts the US government took to never even appear to take the chance of possibly hinting at demanding the removal of speech.  It simply did not happen.  It's ridiculous to suggest that it…
  • @yoyoel.com Yoel Roth on bluesky
    There is so much wrong with this decision — not least of all that it will make us less secure going into the 2024 elections — but the most glaring bit is the theory that tech companies were somehow “coerced” to take action simply by virtue of having a meeting.  That's just... not…
  • @mmasnick.bsky.social Mike Masnick on bluesky
    Great.  Now we have idiot judges misreading the Twitter files.  [embedded post]
  • @joekatz45.bsky.social Joe Katz on bluesky
    What's interesting to me about this is the assumption that this space MUST be open to conservatives, a group that has repeatedly created social networks that intentionally cater only to themselves.  No one on the left ever went on to Truth Social expecting a warm welcome.  [embed…
  • @danielahorwitz.bsky.social Daniel A. Horwitz on bluesky
    Tired: Injunctions are an extraordinary remedy, and they should be as narrow as possible.  —  Wired: Nobody in the federal government, their children, any suspected blood relative, their neighbors (current or former), and anyone who has ever sent or received an email is allowed t…
  • @leahlitman.bsky.social Leah Litman on bluesky
    ok this is also incredible: The judge said that Republican states are being “denied the benefits intended to arise from the federal system.”  —  APPARENTLY THE CONSTITUTION WAS FORMED SO YOU COULD SPREAD ELECTION & COVID MISINFORMATION; HAPPY BIRTHDAY/INDEPENDENCE DAY, AMERICA!! …
  • @aaronjschaffer@mastodon.social Aaron Schaffer on mastodon
    In an extraordinary ruling that came on July 4th (a federal holiday), a federal judge just blocked Biden administration officials from meeting and communicating with social media companies https://www.washingtonpost.com/ ...
  • @intelwire@mastodon.social J.M. Berger on mastodon
    But hey, don't worry, dragging tech CEOs in Republican committee hearings is still fine https://www.washingtonpost.com/ ...
  • @aaronjschaffer@mastodon.social Aaron Schaffer on mastodon
    The judge did carve out some exceptions, including for warnings about national security threats or criminal activity  —  Opinion: https://storage.courtlistener.com/ ...  Ruling: https://storage.courtlistener.com/ ...
  • @tribelaw Laurence Tribe on x
    This injunction is blatantly unconstitutional https://www.washingtonpost.com/ ...
  • @cat_zakrzewski Cat Zakrzewski on x
    BREAKING: A federal judge has blocked key Biden officials from contacting tech companies to encourage limits on ‘protected speech.’ The injunction came in a case brought by Louisiana and Missouri AGs that has critical implications for the First Amendment. https://www.washingtonpo…
  • @bgrueskin Bill Grueskin on x
    “It can't be that the government violates the First Amendment simply by engaging with the platforms about their content-moderation policies,” said @JameelJaffer “If that's what the court is saying here, it's a pretty radical proposition that isn't supported by the case law.” http…
  • @robertkennedyjr Robert F. Kennedy Jr on x
    Federal judge orders President Biden to stop censoring his critics including me. The decision mentions me on page 17. Happy Independence Day Everyone! https://www.wsj.com/...
  • @ggreenwald Glenn Greenwald on x
    As of today, senior Biden officials — including all employees of the FBI, DOJ, DHS, the State Dept. and the WH Press Secretary — are legally banned from doing the following in order to induce or persuade Big Tech platforms to censor Americans. Huge 1st Amendment win:🇺🇸 https://tw…
  • @tracybethhoeg @tracybethhoeg on x
    The NYT article is very difficult to read when one considers it is nonsense to label it “right wing” to oppose the govt working to silence credentialed scientists who were correct Agree w/@akheriaty that @nytimes is “writing themselves into irrelevance” https://www.nytimes.com/..…
  • @jeanne_mann Jeanne Mann on x
    Lies unlimited. That's what the GOP is going for, and now they've got a court ruling to help stifle those who want to correct disinformation & misinformation, lies. Federal Judge Limits Biden Officials' Contacts With Social Media Sites - The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com…
  • @davidsacks David Sacks on x
    A U.S. District Court has ruled that parts of the government including FBI and HHS and cannot urge, encourage, pressure or induce social media sites to remove content containing protected free speech. A much needed decision! 🇺🇸 Happy July 4! 🇺🇸 https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @donaldwelsh16 Donald Welsh on x
    A huge win for free speech at the expense of censorship. Fitting it would be released on July 4th. https://twitter.com/...
  • @normornstein Norman Ornstein on x
    Putin and assorted terrorists, along with misinformation and disinformation hacks, must be thrilled with this. Along with you. https://twitter.com/...
  • @theangryepi Elizabeth Jacobs, PhD on x
    It's fine to take a sharpie and tell Americans that the projected track of a Hurricane is different from the actual factual track, but it's not okay to attempt to curb misinformation during a pandemic catastrophe that killed > a million Americans. https://www.washingtonpost.com/ …
  • @stengel Richard Stengel on x
    This is reverse prior restraint: judge preventing the government from speaking about speech to the platforms. In our system, the government is allowed to speak, and the private entities are allowed to ignore it. That's also free speech. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @mattyglesias Matthew Yglesias on x
    To save free speech from oppressive government, a federal judge acting in collaboration with multiple state attorneys general, is barring a huge number of people from communicating with social media companies. https://www.washingtonpost.com/ ...
  • r/Republican r on reddit
    Judge Orders Biden Officials to Limit Contact With Social-Media Companies.  Ruling says Biden administration policing of social media likely violated First Amendment
  • r/Conservative r on reddit
    Judge Orders Biden Officials to Limit Contact With Social-Media Companies.  Ruling says Biden administration policing of social media likely violated First Amendment
  • r/neoliberal r on reddit
    Federal Judge Limits Biden Officials' Contacts With Social Media Sites
  • r/politics r on reddit
    Judge blocks U.S. officials from tech contacts in First Amendment case
  • r/inthenews r on reddit
    Judge blocks U.S. officials from tech contacts in First Amendment case
  • r/technology r on reddit
    Judge blocks U.S. officials from tech contacts in First Amendment case