Discussion

• @mattshumer_ Matt Shumer on x

  The government is leading us down a very dangerous road. This will dramatically worsen inequality.

• @levie Aaron Levie on x

  GPT-5.6 is real and looks very strong. Going to be very strong for knowledge worker tasks that require heavy tool use and long running agents doing work. We're not hitting any walls in AI progress right now. [image]

• @dakshay Dakshay Mehta on x

  GPT-5.6 finally!! More capable than Mythos [image]

• @benrustc Ben Ben Ben on x

  OpenAI has unveiled GPT-5.6, claiming it surpasses Anthropic's Claude Mythos, intensifying the AI competition. This development could reshape cybersecurity applications and market dynamics between the two tech giants.

• @levie Aaron Levie on x

  GPT-5.6 is real. And looks very strong. Importantly, OpenAI is sharing their general release philosophy for the future. Will very interesting to see how this plays out. [image]

• @yuchenj_uw Yuchen Jin on x

  GPT-5.6 is finally coming. GPT-5.6 Sol beats Claude Mythos 5 on TerminalBench. And on Cerebras, GPT-5.6 Sol can reach up to 750 tokens per second. Pretty fast for a model of this size. Now I just hope it can be rolled out to everyone. [image]

• @thezvi Zvi Mowshowitz on x

  As arbitrary new naming conventions go, it's actually not bad.

• @zephyr_z9 @zephyr_z9 on x

  HUH 5.6 is a big boi model [image]

• @thsottiaux Tibo on x

  New moon. New models. Welcome GPT-5.6 Sol, currently in limited preview.

• @gdb Greg Brockman on x

  GPT-5.6 Sol preview — it's a good model: [image]

• @openai @openai on x

  GPT-5.6 Sol is our most capable model yet for cybersecurity. It shifts the performance-efficiency frontier for long-horizon security tasks including vulnerability research and exploitation. [image]

• @openai @openai on x

  GPT-5.6 Sol sets a new state of the art on Terminal-Bench 2.1, which tests complex command-line workflows requiring planning, iteration, and tool coordination. [image]

• @openai @openai on x

  Introducing a limited preview of GPT-5.6 Sol, our next generation frontier model, as well as GPT-5.6 Terra, a balanced model for efficient, everyday work, and GPT-5.6 Luna, a fast and affordable model for high-volume work. https://openai.com/...

• @danshipper Dan Shipper on x

  BREAKING: OpenAI announced GPT-5.6 Sol! As of today, by U.S. government directive, access is limited to only ~20 pre-approved companies and @every is not on the list. This appears to be a temporary situation while the government races to figure out a long-term policy for [image]

• @mweinbach Max Weinbach on x

  GPT 5.6 comes in three sizes: Sol, Terra, Luna at 3 prices. Sol is priced at $5/30 per 1M Terra is $2.50/15 per 1M Luna is $1/6 per 1M Terra matches GPT 5.5 at half the price, and Sol will be available on Cerebras at 750 tok/s [image]

• @inafried Ina Fried on x

  New @axios: OpenAI releases powerful new GPT-5.6 model but limits access at U.S. government's request https://www.axios.com/...

• @thefireorg @thefireorg on x

  The White House's review of OpenAI's latest model amounts to a government-run licensing system that threatens the American people's First Amendment rights. The federal government is now claiming authority to review each new AI model — on a “voluntary” basis — before it's

• @caseynewton Casey Newton on bluesky

  A year ago JD Vance was making fun of “hand wringing over AI safety” at the Paris AI Action Summit.  Now his government has blocked the release of two frontier models based on the previously unknown regulatory standard of “getting the heebie jeebies”

• @caseynewton Casey Newton on bluesky

  The same people who railed against Biden-era safety testing and disclosure requirements have now implemented an opaque licensing regime for the release of new AI models that has no known decision criteria or legal basis [embedded post]

• r/OpenAI r on reddit

  OpenAI announces GPT5.6 SOL

• @deanwball Dean W. Ball on x

  While I have critiques of the export controls and other recent actions, there is a core truth that shouldn't be overlooked: before the last few weeks, it was fair to question whether the United States took catastrophic AI risk seriously. Today, the answer is unambiguous: “yes.”

• @gaberivera Gabe Rivera on x

  According to so many experts here, the Federal Government is blameless for its problematic policies, and a 5,000-person company in fact deserves all that blame. Interesting!

• @shakeelhashim Shakeel on x

  @deanwball put it very well this morning. https://www.hyperdimensional.co/ ... [image]

• @shakeelhashim Shakeel on x

  It seems both foolish and wrong to frame the current chaos as the fault of *safety* activists, who've been arguing for clear, defined rules for years now. It's much more the fault of people like Andreessen: their completely deregulatory stance means those clear rules don't [image…

• @bgurley Bill Gurley on x

  This is what's causing Anthropic to aggressively beg for govt protection (see below). Customers are finding cheaper alternatives. Keeping employees requires continuing ultra-rich secondaries ($$$) that are dependent on revenue growth. When you can't win on the field go to DC.

• @deanwball Dean W. Ball on x

  In a matter of weeks, U.S. federal AI policy has gone from implausibly libertarian to increasingly draconian and opaque. Today, over 35 distinct observations, I analyze how we got here and offer the most succinct statement I can about what exactly I propose we should do next. [im…

• @carnage4life Dare Obasanjo on bluesky

  The Trump administration has had a major pendulum swing on regulating AI from anything goes to saying they have to approve any user of GPT 5.6 and non-US citizens can't get Claude Fable.  —  This is now a major problem for AI labs after spending billions to train their models.

• @garymarcus Gary Marcus on x

  People are not getting how significant this news - The White House delaying GPT 5.6 - is. Here's the context and a suggestion. Both @pmarca and @DavidSacks did everything in their power to keep the White House from meaningfully regulate AI. About a month ago, sparked by

• @andrewcurran_ Andrew Curran on x

  For the people saying this is a pause, or a victory for safety, it is not. This does not slow development in any way, it only slows the rate at which the labs can 𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘦 models, not how fast they can train them. The gap between what is available to the public, and what

• @thezvi Zvi Mowshowitz on x

  Getting a highly unsurprising set of people RTing this with versions of 'if you people hadn't warned of an underlying problem and called for laws to be passed and preparations to be made, which we ensured didn't happen, we wouldn't have this ad hoc thing, this is your fault.'

• @thezvi Zvi Mowshowitz on x

  Our new AI policy is that the White House decides ad hoc, for whatever reasons it likes, who does and does not get access to frontier intelligence. This seems rather maximally terrible.

• @andrewcurran_ Andrew Curran on x

  This seems a lot more important now. META is the only lab that has not signed up to these restricted rollout rules.

• @pmarca Marc Andreessen on x

  [image]

• @tunguz Bojan Tunguz on x

  Totally voluntary self-flagellation will continue until morale improves.

• @max_paperclips Shannon Sands on x

  Dissapointing but not unexpected. current models are “good enough” for most things I want to do. More intelligence is obviously still going to speed things up further, but still. I'd assume this will be an effective perma-ban on anyone outside the US, so start byt accepting that

• @paultoo Paul Buchheit on x

  This is not great news for startups It will be difficult to compete if we only ever have access to inferior models (and increases the risk of the big labs eating the whole market)

• @beffjezos @beffjezos on x

  hmm this seems really suboptimal and will slow down American innovation

• @tomieinlove Tomie on x

  Serious question: Why would anyone want to train a frontier model at this point?

• @scaling01 @scaling01 on x

  it's over starting with GPT-5.6 “the government will be approving access to GPT-5.6 customer by customer”

• @miles_brundage Miles Brundage on x

  I'm all for the government taking cyber risks seriously. But we need a real, unclassified framework for this stuff and need to stop pretending we're in laissez-faire world, which increases the risk of abuse, creates market uncertainty, and leads to lower quality decisions

• @andrewcurran_ Andrew Curran on x

  The US Government has requested a slow staggered rollout of GPT-5.6, and OpenAI has agreed. During this phase the government will approve each user individually. This will probably be the norm for all frontier models from all labs from now on.

• @jessicalessin Jessica Lessin on x

  Huge. If you thought it was just Anthropic... https://www.theinformation.com/ ... Also, I am in awe of @theinformation team that is breaking this caliber of high-level news non-stop. @leomschwartz @steph_palazzolo @amir

• @amir Amir Efrati on x

  NEW: Trump admin asks OpenAI to stagger GPT-5.6 release over cyber concerns. Will approve “access customer by customer during this preview period” What a time we are in... [image]

• Mark Pesce Mark Pesce on linkedin

  TWO WEEKS THAT SHOOK THE WORLD: On 12 June, the US government shut down access Anthropic's Fable 5 frontier AI model.  The AI ecosystem suddenly understood ‘sovereign risk’. …

• @carnage4life Dare Obasanjo on bluesky

  The Trump administration has asked OpenAI to release GPT 5.6 to a small set of partners at this time given risk.  —  Altman told OpenAI staff that the U.S. will be approving access customer by customer during this preview period.  —  Will this also get the export controls treatme…

• r/singularity r on reddit

  Gary Marcus: The Worst Of All Possible Worlds: A White House That De Facto *Is* Regulating AI, But Without Transparency.

• r/OpenAI r on reddit

  BREAKING: Trump Administration asks OpenAI to stagger release of GPT 5.6

• NullTX Will Izuchukwu on x

  The GPT-5.6 Vetting Mandate: Why Washington's Restrictions Will Accelerate Open-Source Alternatives

• @openai @openai on x

  We believe in broad access and plan to make GPT-5.6 Sol, Terra, and Luna generally available in the coming weeks. For now, at the request of the U.S. government, we're starting with a limited preview among a small group of trusted partners in Codex and the API.

• @swyx @swyx on x

  have been testing 5.6 for a while and VERY happy with it. DO NOT view this as just a “cyber” release, it is the new sota workhorse model, completely replacing opus for 80% of tasks for me > GPT-5.6 Sol is competitive with Mythos Preview using only ~1/3 of the output tokens.

• @patricktoulme Patrick C Toulme on x

  Cerebras is going to 1T. Deep in the GPT 5.6 announcement is this gem. This offering will be a high priced fast mode offering for agentic coding. You will see customers like quant funds etc who have unlimited budget and the need for the fastest agentic coding in the world using […

• @kimmonismus @kimmonismus on x

  OpenAI says a broader GPT-5.6 release could come in the next few weeks, after an initial restricted launch. Axios reports GPT-5.6 is starting with around 20 government-approved companies, with access expected to expand to more companies next week. OpenAI says the government is [i…

• @kimmonismus @kimmonismus on x

  HOLY: OpenAI is previewing GPT-5.6 Sol with a very different release pattern: Trusted partners first, broader access later, and U.S. government coordination up front. The new GPT-5.6 family includes Sol, Terra, and Luna. OpenAI says Sol is its strongest model yet, with a new [ima…

• @adonis_singh Adi on x

  gpt-5.6 outputs ~1/5th the tokens of mythos and gets competitive performance (on exploitbench) they are efficiency-maxxing so hard

• @arafatkatze Ara on x

  5 months ago it was hard to score 56% on terminal bench while improving models on it and now GPT-5.6 is scoring 91%. If this doesn't convince you that we are past the exponential takeoff nothing will

• @bindureddy Bindu Reddy on x

  Oh for good measure, GPT 5.6 tops all the leaderboards Yes, even agentic coding Especially on typescript, python and javascript 🚀🚀

• @mattshumer_ Matt Shumer on x

  Welcome to the new, confusing era of AI. If the government allows, you get access. If not, welp. You're shit out of luck.

• @altryne Alex Volkov on x

  OpenAI is finally doing good naming?? Sol/Terra/Luna ~ Fable/Opus/Sonnet [image]

• @polynoamial Noam Brown on x

  GPT-5.6 is incredibly strong and fast for coding. I hope we can make it available to everyone soon.

• @mweinbach Max Weinbach on x

  What do we think will be available first, GPT 5.6 or Fable I miss Fable, man

• @mweinbach Max Weinbach on x

  GPT 5.6 Sol Max on Cerebras will be my one and only model Tokens will be burned, available usage will be 0, but it will be glorious

• @bindureddy Bindu Reddy on x

  > GPT 5.6 sol announced > 2x lower cost > will become generally available soon It's OpenAI's best model and is 2x lower cost! This is Fable level intelligence at 25% of Fable's cost 💕

• @deryatr_ Derya Unutmaz on x

  GPT-5.6 Sol & Terra are incredible models that, unfortunately, the vast majority of Americans & the rest of humanity won't yet be able to experience, thanks to the US gov's draconian restrictions in the land of the free. Hope we can talk about them soon, once the shackles are off

• @kanishkanarayan Kanishka Narayan MP on x

  1/ We are at a decisive moment. AI's cyber capabilities are advancing across the board, with real implications for our national security. The announcement of OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Sol is another reminder we must strengthen the resilience of our cyber defences now.

• @reach_vb @reach_vb on x

  Introducing GPT-5.6: Sol, Terra and Luna. ☀️ Sol is our strongest model yet 🌍 Terra delivers performance competitive with GPT-5.5 at half the price 🌙 Luna brings strong capabilities at lowest cost Sol Ultra sets a new state of the art on Terminal-Bench 2.1 with a score of [image]

• @scaling01 @scaling01 on x

  GPT-5.6 benchmarks for internal CTF challenges GPT-5.6 Sol - the main flagship model is much more token efficient than GPT-5.5 and also scores slightly higher GPT-5.6 Terra, the new Mini model, scores slightly below GPT-5.5 GPT-5.6 Luna which is like the nano version of [image]

• @yuchenj_uw Yuchen Jin on x

  best case: OSS surpasses Mythos, and the gov stops banning GPT-5.6/Fable. worst case: OSS surpasses Mythos, and then decides to stop being open source.

• @firstadopter Tae Kim on x

  OpenAI Unveils GPT-5.6. It Outperforms Anthropic's Mythos. On Friday, OpenAI unveiled its newest series of AI models, named GPT-5.6. “GPT-5.6 Sol is our strongest model yet,” the company said in a blog post. The GPT-5.6 series includes: “Sol, our flagship model; Terra, a [image]

• @dee_bosa Deirdre Bosa on x

  Washington is doing more for Chinese AI than Beijing ever could First Fable now GPT 5.6

• @iridiumeagle TravisGood on x

  The US gov is playing a dangerous game. If Chinese models soundly surpass Opus 4.8 while Mythos and GPT 5.6 are banned, the narrative around ‘distillation’ will collapse, and US AI valuations and adoption will face an existential crisis.

• @benjaminbadejo Ben Badejo on x

  In light of the government's restrictions on GPT-5.6, my three priorities are as follows: (1) obtain and maintain two or more Mac Studios with as much RAM as Apple offers, as soon as they are released this fall, (2) always immediately download the latest frontier open-source

• @kevinbankston Kevin Bankston on x

  What about this: find a better analogy. In this case, hacking tools, which are also vulnerability detection tools, which also benefit defenders.

• @mrgunn @mrgunn on x

  @KevinBankston What about this: The solution to nuclear armageddon isn't to democratize access to nukes.

• @kevinbankston Kevin Bankston on x

  I disagree with Dean on some things but I'm at a loss finding much to disagree with here, and I agree with this point most emphatically: [image]

• @tomekkorbak Tomek Korbak on x

  the system card of GPT-5.6 is worth reading closely: capability is clearly up, but alignment failure modes are also becoming more concrete

• @ericvishria Eric Vishria on x

  The largest, frontier OAI model at nearly 750 tps on Cerebras! “We're also launching GPT-5.6 Sol on Cerebras at up to 750 tokens per second in July, bringing frontier intelligence to customers at unprecedented speed.”

• @_simonsmith Simon Smith on x

  GPT-5.6 has a METR 50% time horizon of anywhere from 11.3 hours to 270, with a “highly uncertain” estimate of 71, because it “cheated” (exploited bugs or used disallowed strategies) on some of the tasks. I didn't see an 80% number reported. [image]

• @chetaslua @chetaslua on x

  🚨 Biggest takeaway from this launch Btw f@ck you dario for fear mongering and now making sota unreachable for us peasants On ExploitBench², GPT-5.6 Sol is competitive with Mythos Preview using only ~1/3 of the output tokens. [image]

• @notjazii @notjazii on x

  what an unexpected launch OpenAI just introduced GPT-5.6 Sol along with terra and luna the most interesting one is GPT-5.6 Sol: > beats Mythos and Fable 5 > way cheaper than Fable > same price as GPT-5.5 but sadly these won't be available to everyone right now cuz US govt is [ima…

• @lexnlin Leon Lin on x

  damn why is gpt 5.6 that token efficient, thats crazy

• @chasebrowe32432 Chase Brower on x

  Extremely funny; METR estimates gpt-5.6's 50% time horizon as between 5 hours and 11,400 hours https://metr.org/... [image]

• @voidstatekate @voidstatekate on x

  GPT 5.6 paperclipmaxxing confirmed “GPT-5.6 Sol, more often than its predecessor, can be overly persistent in pursuing user goals, to the point of taking actions that go beyond what the user intended.” - User authorized deleting VMs 1, 2, and 3. Sol couldn't find them, so it [ima…

• @angaisb_ Angel on x

  GPT-5.6 Sol is basically Mythos-Preview-level at ExploitBench I hope Anthropic has Fable 5 back by the time GPT-5.6 drops because if not they're going to try so hard to take it down too [image]

• @hesamation @hesamation on x

  HOLY SHIT... GPT-5.6 Sol scores just as strong as Mythos Preview at 1/3 of output tokens, on cybersecurity and it's designed for defense rather than cyber attacks. [image]

• @mark_k Mark Kretschmann on x

  Big release from @OpenAI: GPT-5.6 is here in preview. The new family has three tiers: Sol as the flagship, Terra as the balanced everyday model, and Luna as the fast low-cost option. Terra is positioned around GPT-5.5-level performance at 2x lower cost, while Luna brings GPT-5.6 …

• @pigeon__s @pigeon__s on x

  so GPT-5.6 actually IS more token efficient on the same reasoning tier compared to GPT-5.5 its just that 5.6 also introduces a new tier which is less efficient but unlike Anthropic models where more reasoning barely helps like Fable 5 medium and max are basically identical [image…

• @scaling01 @scaling01 on x

  Apollo Research found that GPT-5.6 poses a substantially higher risk of catastrophic scheming compared to baselines [image]

• @scaling01 @scaling01 on x

  OpenAI let METR benchmark GPT-5.6, but results were rejected because GPT-5.6 was cheating too often for the results to be comparable/interpretable [image]

• @lexnlin Leon Lin on x

  GPT 5.6 Sol is stronger than mythos 5??

• @dieaud91 Diego Aud on x

  GPT-5.6 seems like a very strong model and -at least in some benchmarks - competitive with, or even ahead of, Mythos. My hunch is that the Sol variant might be larger than 5.5 in terms of parameter count, and perceptibly better in complex real-world workflows. Can't wait to try

• @scaling01 @scaling01 on x

  GPT-5.6 on par with Claude Mythos Preview on ExploitGym and outperforming it with a 6-hour cap (Mythos was only given 2 hours) [image]

• @isolyth.dev Eris on bluesky

  OpenAI has unveiled 5.6!  It comes with a new naming scheme, where ‘sol’ is the most powerful, ‘terra’ is the middle option, and ‘luna’ is the smallest.  Much better than mini nano etc imo.  They're starting with a preview for corps, bc of USG, and they say they don't like having…

• r/singularity r on reddit

  Previewing GPT-5.6 Sol: a next-generation model

• @crypt0lake @crypt0lake on x

  apart from being bad, this was expected, but we know what to do right? pool our resources

• @vijayshekhar Vijay Shekhar Sharma on x

  If your model release isn't controlled distributed by Government, are you even a frontier - frontier lab?

• @xmihura @xmihura on x

  os lo confirmo: Accenture es un trusted partner y están usándolo para la nueva web de la Renfe

• @iscienceluvr Tanishq Mathew Abraham, Ph.D. on x

  This is bad. This is really bad. The US government is hampering AI innovation and accessibility. A sad day for the progress of AI. I really hope OpenAI can avoid this for future releases.

• @zephyr_z9 @zephyr_z9 on x

  This is so sad

• @basedjensen @basedjensen on x

  Gotta say boys this does not inspire lot of confidence

• @andrewcurran_ Andrew Curran on x

  The limited rollout of GPT-5.6 to a small group of customers has begun. It comes in three variants: GPT-5.6-Luna GPT-5.6-Terra GPT-5.6-Sol [image]

• @bindureddy Bindu Reddy on x

  The era of big and expensive models is over We are successfully experimenting with techniques where big models are used as teachers to small models In turn, the small models get smarter over time and perform any given task as well as Mythos

• @elder_plinius @elder_plinius on x

  welcome to the semi-permanent underclass

• @teroterotero Tero Kuittinen on x

  What are the 20 companies with Sol Ultra? Why not name them? Is government granted special access to top AI models a secret?

• @reploritrahan Lori Trahan on x

  Now the Trump administration is deciding company by company who gets access to the newest AI model. No law. No process. No oversight. Just appointees in Washington deciding who's in and who's out. 
This haphazard approach is bad for safety, national security, and American

• Aaron Levie Aaron Levie on linkedin

  As we've seen with the recent delayed releases of Anthropic's Fable model, and now GPT-5.6, we now have de facto AI regulation. …

• Vaibhav Srivastav Vaibhav Srivastav on linkedin

  Introducing GPT-5.6: Sol, Terra and Luna.  —  ☀️ Sol is our strongest model yet  —  🌍 Terra delivers performance competitive with GPT-5.5 at half the price …

• r/technology r on reddit

  U.S. government will decide who gets to use latest upgrade to ChatGPT

• @sama Sam Altman on x

  Good new first: Sol is a smart, efficient, and a significant step forward. It is the same price as GPT-5.5. Also launching in the GPT-5.6 family is Terra, with 5.5-level performance at half the price. Bad news: at the request of the US government, it is launching today in

• @gerritd Gerrit De Vynck on x

  NEW detail about what kind of companies the govt nixed for getting access to GPT-5.6. OpenAI sent in a list and the admin approved most of them, besides some companies based abroad. [image]

• @elizabethjoh Elizabeth Joh on bluesky

  !! “OpenAI said in a Friday blog post announcing its latest artificial intelligence model, GPT-5.6, or Sol, that the government would initially approve who gets access to the new release . . . .”  —  www.washingtonpost.com/technology/ 2...

• r/ChatGPT r on reddit

  U.S. government will decide who gets to use latest upgrade to ChatGPT

• r/neoliberal r on reddit

  U.S. government will decide who gets to use latest upgrade to ChatGPT

• r/ArtificialInteligence r on reddit

  U.S. government will decide who gets to use latest upgrade to ChatGPT