/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

X limits X Pro access to subscribers of the $40/month Premium+ plan without notifying users in advance; it was previously available in the $8/month Premium plan

Social network X is now limiting X Pro access to customers who subscribe to the X Premium+ plan, which is priced at $40 per month (or $33/month when paid annually).

MacRumors Juli Clover

Context & Ripple Effects

X Pro had already moved from a broadly available tool toward a paid feature when users encountered its first subscriber paywall in 2023. X later built a tiered offering around ad reduction and reply amplification, then raised Premium+ pricing to $22 per month in late 2024.

Moving X Pro out of the $8 Premium tier makes the product a sharper Premium+ differentiator, rather than simply another benefit bundled with verification. It extends the logic of Premium+'s earlier no-ads and reply-boost package to a workflow-oriented feature.

First-order effects

  • Premium subscribers who rely on X Pro lose access unless they upgrade to Premium+, priced at $40 per month or $33 per month annually.
  • X consolidates X Pro's subscription value in its highest-priced consumer tier, while the $8 plan becomes materially less capable for power users.

Second-order effects

  • The change creates a clear upgrade decision for X Pro users: absorb a much higher price, reduce use of the tool, or seek alternative social-media workflow products.
  • It also raises the burden on Premium+ to justify its price with features that matter to intensive users, rather than primarily visibility and ad-related benefits.

Third-order effects

  • If X continues shifting functional access upward across tiers, subscription plans could become less about status markers and more about metered access to core participation and publishing tools.
  • That strategy may improve revenue per remaining subscriber, but it also exposes X to the subscription-scale trade-off: narrower access can limit the user base that creates and manages activity on the platform.

The trend: X is increasingly using access to core creator and power-user tools as the lever for tiered subscription monetization.

Discussion

  • @benvolin Ben Volin on x
    Elon wants to charge $40/month or $395/year to use Tweetdeck. See ya ✌️
  • @nikitabier Nikita Bier on x
    @monetization_x What we're launching in X in the next week or two will be much more powerful than XPro. We're only keeping XPro for people that absolutely need it for hyper-specific business workflows.
  • @themaxburns Max Burns on x
    X Pro is a great tool, but it isn't worth a roughly 400% price increase (to $40/mo) to keep using it. Since X Pro was the only thing keeping me on a paid subscription, it's great motivation to unsubscribe. Solid move, @elonmusk!
  • @keithsmithnba Keith Smith on x
    I was fine paying $8/month for Tweetdeck. But for $40/month, the usefulness of Tweetdeck is no longer worth it. A bunch of stuff is constantly broken with it now anyway. Ridiculous.
  • @gasbuddyguy Patrick De Haan on x
    So @elonmusk you want us to spend less time on X since you're taking away the tools (tweetdeck) that made it easy to engage and post? yeah that's a terrific idea that definitely won't backfire.
  • @chrisvannini Chris Vannini on x
    Moving Tweetdeck to the $40/month tier is ridiculous and makes this place much less usable.
  • @themaxburns Max Burns on x
    First Twitter moved X Pro behind the Twitter Premium paywall. Now they've moved it behind the Premium+ paywall. X Pro is basically the only useful thing about having a Twitter Premium membership.
  • @jbillinson Josh Billinson on x
    This is such a funny time to do this because all of my search columns have been broken for weeks
  • @markvalorian Mark Valorian on x
    I think I figured this out. Elon rolled some heads at 𝕏 recently, including the CMO and 20 other people. According to WSJ, the remaining staff were told to “focus on growing revenue”. All of sudden, a major feature (Tweetdeck/X Pro) is haphazardly paywalled behind the most [image…
  • @scobleizer Robert Scoble on x
    This bums me out. Means far fewer people can really get value from my lists of the AI community. Working on a way to watch the entire AI community here, but getting it up is going slowly. Looks like it will be next week before I can turn on my AI that reads everyone here in AI
  • @ohlennart Lennart Heim on x
    Tweetdeck (now called X Pro) used to be free. Then you required X Premium, and now the Premium+ plan. Disappointing. It's hard to stay sane on social media and managed topic lists at least helped. @nikitabier (If you've not used it before, I'm sorry. I'd highly recommend it.) [im…
  • @kyledcheney Kyle Cheney on x
    This is a very lame thing that just happened. [image]
  • @cocktailpeanut @cocktailpeanut on x
    It's over. Been using Tweetdeck (aka X Pro) to follow several of @Scobleizer's lists, but I guess this is the end. [image]
  • @culturecrave @culturecrave on x
    Twitter (X) has now made X Pro exclusive to Premium+ users • Now costs nearly $400 per year to use • Previously known as TweetDeck — which was free • Users were given no notice • Annual subscribers are being forced to upgrade mid-cycle [image]
  • @techau @techau on x
    TweetDeck, then X Pro has been my interface to the Twitter/X every single day I sat down at the computer. I use it to monitor the latest technology news, trending topics etc. It's how I stay connected across a range of topics, including local ones in my area. One of the best [ima…
  • @manniefabian @manniefabian on x
    Uh, so tweetdeck (X Pro) is now behind an even higher paywall? Wtf [image]
  • @kevinobie1 Kevin Obermeyer on x
    As of today, you can't use X Pro (formerly TweetDeck) even at Premium. You have to pay for Premium+ for a huge amount more money and for services you may not even want or need. This platform continues to focus everything around the few highest paying voices. So frustrating.
  • @scobleizer Robert Scoble on x
    I bet this is to keep people from scraping X with their OpenClaw machines and protecting the X API business model, which is what I'm using to get all posts from X to run my AI. Still takes away a major feature of X Premium.
  • @quaslacrimas Tantum on x
    Man, did twitter really just make X Pro (the old tweetdeck) available to Premium+ only? Twitter has made a lot of questionable product/UX decisions in the last year, and the availability of the X Pro UI was a safety valve limiting the damage to people who didn't like the changes.
  • @mark_scheig Mark Scheig on x
    The only reason I paid for premium on here was to use Tweetdeck. As of today, that's only available on the premium+ plan. Instead of $11 per month, $50 per month. For all you old In Living Color fans out there, I don't think so. Homie don't play that.
  • @gantosj Joe on x
    A surprising & frankly greedy move by @X @elonmusk Millions of users were told to pay for X Premium to keep using TweetDeck. Now X has pushed TweetDeck into Premium+, raising the cost >5× from $102 to $560 No doubt @X is going to face a lot of backlash for this decision.🤮🤮 [image…
  • @ndhapple Nolan Hicks on bluesky
    The app formerly known as TweetDeck will apparently now cost $40 a month — www.macrumors.com/2026/03/26/ x...