/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

The Trump administration settles Murthy v. Missouri from 2022, preventing the Surgeon General, CDC, and CISA from having social media companies suppress speech

The Trump administration has agreed to a settlement that will bar three federal agencies from pressuring social media companies …

Reuters Mike Scarcella

Discussion

  • @eric_schmitt Eric Schmitt on x
    We just won Missouri v. Biden. As Missouri's Attorney General, I sued the Biden regime for brazenly colluding with Big Tech to silence Missouri families — censoring the truth about COVID, the Hunter Biden laptop, the open border, and the 2020 election. They tried to turn [image]
  • @tomfitton Tom Fitton on x
    Great news! Even more reason for federal prosecutors to examine the Biden censorship operation, @AGPamBondi!
  • @nichulscher @nichulscher on x
    🚨BREAKING WIN: Government Agencies BANNED From Pressuring Big Tech to Censor Americans for 10 YEARS A Consent Decree in Missouri v. Biden now bars the CDC, CISA, and the U.S. Surgeon General from coercing social media platforms to suppress protected speech for the next DECADE. [i…
  • @bhweingarten Benjamin Weingarten on x
    🚨Big Breaking News: The Federal speech police have disarmed in the landmark Missouri v. Biden case that exposed the Censorship-Industrial Complex. Pursuant to a consent decree settling the dispute, for the next 10 years the Surgeon General, CDC, and CISA: “shall take no [image]
  • @nclalegal @nclalegal on x
    BREAKING: NCLA reaches historic settlement in Missouri v. Biden, striking a major blow against government-induced social media censorship. CDC, CISA and the U.S. Surgeon General are now barred from threatening social media companies into censoring constitutionally protected [imag…
  • @bbmagamom Bethany O'Leary on x
    🚨 BREAKING: Huge win for free speech...Missouri v. Biden just settled. The U.S. government signed a 10-year consent decree admitting it colluded with Big Tech to silence Americans on COVID, the Hunter Biden laptop, and the 2020 election. The CDC, CISA, and Surgeon General are [im…
  • @drjbhattacharya Jay Bhattacharya on x
    Huzzah! The consent decree in Missouri v. Biden is a historic victory for free speech in the US. Though I had to switch to the government side in the case after I became NIH director, I've never been more pleased by “losing” in my life. A huge win for all Americans.
  • @aaronkheriatymd Aaron Kheriaty on x
    BREAKING: I am delighted to report that we finally achieved victory today in Missouri v. Biden, our case challenging government censorship on social media. CDC, CISA and the U.S. Surgeon General are now barred from threatening social media companies into censoring
  • @noupside Renee DiResta on bluesky
    Senator Eric Schmitt got a participation trophy and is declaring victory 😂  —  His injunction says that CISA, the CDC, and the Surgeon General can't censor the 3 plaintiffs on 5 platforms.  —  Government officials can still communicate with platforms, tell them content is wrong/f…
  • @kdbyproxy Ira ‘Bluebeard Homer’ Goldman on bluesky
    In the normal course (of course, this isn't normal), is it odd that the caption on this suit, now resolved, still reads Missouri v Biden, rather than Missouri v Trump? [images]
  • @masnick.com Mike Masnick on bluesky
    Ah peak stupidity.  A bunch of grifters who were moderated on social media sued the Biden admin claiming “censorship.”  Bounced around stupid courts w/SCOTUS finally saying “um, no evidence of gov't censorship.”  Some of the plaintiffs now work in the admin. Either way the lawsui…
  • @judiciarygop @judiciarygop on x
    The Biden Administration pressured Big Tech companies to censor what Americans could say online. We exposed the censorship-industrial complex. Yesterday's consent decree was a MAJOR WIN for free speech.
  • @repthomasmassie Thomas Massie on x
    In 2023, Missouri sued Biden's admin for colluding with Big Tech to censor speech. I signed Missouri's amicus brief. We won! @CDCgov, @Surgeon_General, & @CISAgov can no longer deplatform First Amendment-protected speech. Congrats to @SenEricSchmitt for leading the fight! [image]
  • @jim_jordan Rep. Jim Jordan on x
    A win for the First Amendment. @JudiciaryGOP's investigation exposed how the Biden Administration pressured Big Tech to censor American speech online. Today, the U.S. government signed a 10-year consent decree finally admitting it colluded with these companies to silence [image]
  • @corbinkbarthold Corbin K. Barthold on x
    What a mess. The district court wrote a piece of fan fiction in favor of the plaintiffs. It was a performance piece — issued on the Fourth of July, when courts are closed. It was riddled with errors — even fabricated quotes. Schmitt lost at the Supreme Court, which gave us, [imag…
  • @thefireorg @thefireorg on x
    Government jawboning is wrong — whether the pressure is coming from a Republican administration or a Democratic one. While this settlement may provide some limited protection and is a step in the right direction, much more needs to be done to limit jawboning. Congress must pass […