Discussion

• @sama Sam Altman on x

  Tonight, we reached an agreement with the Department of War to deploy our models in their classified network. In all of our interactions, the DoW displayed a deep respect for safety and a desire to partner to achieve the best possible outcome. AI safety and wide distribution of

• @uswremichael @uswremichael on x

  When it's comes to matters of life and death for our warfighters, having a reliable and steady partner that engages in good faith makes all the difference as we enter into the AI Age. Onwards @sama !

• @sammykoppelman Sam Koppelman on x

  Today, @hntrbrkmedia signed an enterprise deal with Claude. This is not a hard choice. Join us.

• @teortaxestex @teortaxestex on x

  interesting detail, Cannibal King is very graciously offering his competitors to share the government teat. For all lawful purposes only, of course! [image]

• @krishnanrohit Rohit on x

  This is generational talent, showing how it's done. Honestly incredible.

• @nickadobos Nick Dobos on x

  Whelp. The future is getting weirder.

• @tedlieu Ted Lieu on x

  The Department of Defense just agreed to the same two conditions with OpenAI that Anthropic was asking for. Can someone explain? I genuinely don't understand.

• @adamscochran Adam Cochran on x

  Cancelling my ChatGPT subscriptions. I don't support bootlickers.

• @linusekenstam @linusekenstam on x

  What a complete shit show. DoD accepts the same terms as Anthropic has held firmly for 2 months of negotiations. The DoD is scrambling, I can hear the voices in the meeting “just make it happen, what ever it takes”. Sam could not even mention Anthropic.

• @tysonbrody Tyson Brody on x

  in order to designate a vendor as a supply chain risk, DoD has to confirm “less intrusive measures are not reasonably available.” so wouldn't it be compelled to offer similar terms to Anthropic? I guess we'll find out if the deal is really what Sam says. [image]

• @zeffmax Max Zeff on x

  “We will deploy FDEs to help...” turns out, we just needed consultants

• @kevinroose Kevin Roose on x

  The DOW got so mad at Anthropic for insisting on carve-outs for mass domestic surveillance and autonomous weapons that they declared it a supply chain risk and struck a deal with OpenAI that includes...the exact same carve-outs.

• @jakehalloran1 Jake Halloran on x

  i genuinely dont see a way to read this other than the dod attempted to murder and replace anthropic with openai under the same policy terms because openai is run by trump donors.

• @danprimack Dan Primack on x

  How does a company raise $110 billion and have that be the second biggest thing it's done that day?

• @kevinroose Kevin Roose on x

  As of tonight, there are two frontier AI labs whose models are approved for use in classified military systems. One has been declared a Huawei-level threat to national security for insisting that its models not be used for mass domestic surveillance and fully autonomous

• @m_ccuri Maria Curi on x

  Key distinction btwn OAI/Anthro — Altman in his statement is acknowledging mass surveillance is illegal and the Pentagon will comply with applicable law. Anthropic contends the law has not caught up with AI and worries AI can supercharge the legal collection of public data.

• @amitisinvesting Amit on x

  @sama If the same terms you guys got were the exact same terms Anthropic were asking for (no mass surveillance and autonomous weapons) then why didn't they sign with Anthropic?

• @chrisrmcguire Chris McGuire on x

  One of two things must be true: either the language OpenAI agreed to contains subtle—but potentially important—differences from the language Anthropic rejected (e.g. “human responsibility for the use of force” could mean a lot of things, so the specific contract details/language

• @theo @theo on x

  Not the outcome I expected better if I'm being totally honest

• @tvietor08 Tommy Vietor on x

  Anthropic asked that its model not be used in fully autonomous killer robots and mass surveillance of Americans. The pentagon flipped out and punished them, so of course this craven dork decided it was a chance to make more money.

• @dee_bosa Deirdre Bosa on x

  So.... Anthropic got blacklisted for the same red lines OpenAI just got written into its contract? Or did OpenAI just accept the weaker version of those red lines that Anthropic wouldn't sign?

• @natolambert Nathan Lambert on x

  This is confusing and stands to fracture the AI community unless they are being misleading or had different information on the Anthropic situation. Feels like furthering the policy of attacking companies being defined by politics. Am I missing something? (I hope so)

• @afinetheorem Kevin A. Bryan on x

  Announcing this with a token “we ask that the same terms go to other unnamed companies” is the opposite of a profile in courage. Look at how many key employees at Anthropic publicly support their CEO on “don't be extralegally extorted” vs. how many will publicly support Sam here.

• @ryxcommar @ryxcommar on x

  I'm confused. This whole thing is confusing. Is Sam lying or misleading about the terms, or does the Trump administration just not like Anthropic? Is this because Dario Amodei supported Kamala Harris? When's the lawsuit happening over the procurement process? What's going on?

• @jasonbotterill @jasonbotterill on x

  @sama This doesnt make sense how did OpenAI get the agreements which the DoW couldn't get in compromise with Anthropic?

• @peterwildeford Peter Wildeford on x

  Sam Altman says the DoW has agreed to exactly the same two red lines Anthropic wanted. So either the DoW is giving OpenAI a deal they wouldn't give Anthropic, or something is amiss.

• @therealadamg @therealadamg on x

  For me, it's the embedding of the OpenAI FDE team + a cloud deployment model that makes this work. People, process & technology.

• @thdxr Dax on x

  if it's true that this is the same safety constraints this seems to have been a dick measuring contest sounds like it started because ant went to the govt after the maduro thing to re-assert their rules and the govt was annoyed to be checked like this and wanted to assert their

• @tszzl Roon on x

  most important part of this >We are asking the DoW to offer these same terms to all AI companies [...] We have expressed our strong desire to see things de-escalate away from legal and governmental actions and towards reasonable agreements.

• @krishnanrohit Rohit on x

  I'm speculating this means by the way that there are representations made by Dow and not signed into the agreement that openai can turn things off under certain circumstances.

• @mreflow Matt Wolfe on x

  So there's definitely more to the story than what we're hearing from Anthropic, right?? Like why are they agreeing to the same terms from OpenAI?

• r/accelerate r on reddit

  Sam Altman: We Have Reached An Agreement With The Department Of War

• @jeffrsebo Jeff Sebo on x

  OpenAI needs to reject this contract if Anthropic is declared a supply chain risk, even if the terms offered to OpenAI are better than the ones offered to Anthropic. The Pentagon's behavior is totally unacceptable, and the industry needs to say so with one voice.

• @scaling01 @scaling01 on x

  if OpenAI makes a deal with this government it is over for them they will have sold their soul that point you can no longer defend the employees, as they will be complicit hypocrites signing the notdivided letter, but not taking any action when it matters fire sam and greg [image…

• @provisionalidea James Rosen-Birch on x

  Two possibilities: Either (1) OpenAI is *not* actually taking the same line as Anthropic and Sam is misleading the company, or (2) the USG was deliberately interfering in and sabotaging Anthropic's IPO in OpenAI's interest (multiple Trump backers have major OpenAI positions)

• @signulll @signulll on x

  anyone trying to opportunistically cozy up to government demand right now is stepping straight into a generational perception minefield with both their employees & their customers. there's no thread the needle strategy here. you are what you do, when you do it.

• @danielnewmanuv Daniel Newman on x

  Dario out, Sam in. 👀

• @sharongoldman Sharon Goldman on x

  At the OpenAI all-hands, staff were told that the most challenging aspect of the deal for leadership were concerns about foreign surveillance, and that there was a major worry about AI-driven surveillance threatening democracy, according to the source. However, company leaders

• @tysonbrody Tyson Brody on x

  I mean this would would destroy whatever legal justification Hegseth is hoping to marshal against Anthropic, right? [image]

• @thezvi Zvi Mowshowitz on x

  If true this completely invalidates the entire argument of DoW about Anthropic, no?

• @jakehalloran1 Jake Halloran on x

  For the low price of one 50 million dollar donation the trump admin will attempt to murder your number one corporate competitor

• @zerohedge @zerohedge on x

  But... but... Iliya was just praising Sam for “taking a similar stance” as Amodei. How could Sam possibly U-turn so quickly on his core altruistic principles?! [image]

• @teortaxestex @teortaxestex on x

  Cannibal King wins.

• @markjacob Mark Jacob on bluesky

  The Anthropic dispute makes it clear that the Trump regime will not tolerate American businesses taking an ethical approach to emerging technology.

• @davelee.me Dave Lee on bluesky

  Loophole [embedded post]

• @caseynewton Casey Newton on bluesky

  Either the DOD is taking a softer stance with OpenAI (which seems hard to believe) or OpenAI is prepared to make more concessions here than it is acknowledging [embedded post]

• r/singularity r on reddit

  OpenAI is negotiating with the U.S. government, Sam Altman tells staff |  Fortune

• r/BetterOffline r on reddit

  Trump orders federal agencies to stop using Anthropic technology in dispute over AI safety.  (If this is the way the bubble pops...)

• r/technology r on reddit

  OpenAI is negotiating with the U.S. government, Sam Altman tells staff

• r/ArtificialInteligence r on reddit

  Trump orders all federal agencies to phase out use of Anthropic technology

• r/technology r on reddit

  Trump orders all federal agencies to phase out use of Anthropic technology

• r/law r on reddit

  Trump orders all federal agencies to phase out use of Anthropic technology

• r/technology r on reddit

  Trump orders all federal agencies to phase out use of Anthropic technology

• r/politics r on reddit

  Anthropic refuses to bend to Pentagon on AI safeguards as dispute nears deadline

• @ilyasut Ilya Sutskever on x

  It's extremely good that Anthropic has not backed down, and it's siginficant that OpenAI has taken a similar stance.  In the future, there will be much more challenging situations of this nature, and it will be critical for the relevant leaders to rise up to the occasion, for fie…

• @rnatourious Rhana Natour on x

  Hey so OpenAI previously had a red line that they would not allow their models to be used in warfare *at all*. That is until 3 months into the war in Gaza. That red line changed to allow for “national security” scenarios. These companies have shifted red lines before and try to […

• @mikeisaac Rat King on x

  (meanwhile xAI fully capitulated, it seems. but also funny that that seems to be the one the government isn't exactly frothing at the mouth to get to agree)

• @mikeisaac Rat King on x

  strategically, it was probably smart of OAI and google to let anthropic be the face of resistance in this little skirmish but hard for goog and OAI to score points in public after the battle has been fought

• @ianbassin Ian Bassin on bluesky

  Hmm.  Is it that the Trump Admin saw Anthropic as moving into the AI lead, didn't feel their leadership was sufficiently loyal, so sought to destroy them in order to elevate companies more likely to be loyal?  —  Sort of like the WB-Netflix play.  Only loyalists can succeed.  —  …

• @edzitron.com Ed Zitron on bluesky

  This “oh they're so strong standing up to the DoD” shit ignores that Anthropic has worked with it since 2024.  Wow, they had some ethical boundaries!  Gimme a break.  OpenAI has the same ones btw!  You gonna start clapping for Sam Altman?  —  www.axios.com/2026/02/27/a...

• @mguariglia Matthew Guariglia on bluesky

  OpenAI claims it's joining Anthropic to say the DOD can't use their AI for surveillance/autonomous weapons.  As DOD starts an embargo of any military contractor using their products, will they do the same to OpenAI?  Wild this happens on a day a report is out about how Grok for g…

• @davelee.me Dave Lee on bluesky

  And Trump's complaint that Anthropic is staffed by “Leftwing nut jobs” won't stretch to OpenAI, whose president Greg Brockman donated $25m to a MAGA super PAC.  Sam Altman has told staff his company draws the same red line as Anthropic www.axios.com/2026/02/27/a...

• @tcarmody Tim Carmody on bluesky

  The most craven person you know just had a moment of courage [embedded post]

• @caseynewton Casey Newton on bluesky

  Even one other company speaking up like this makes it harder for the Pentagon to make good on its insane threats.  Would love for Google to join the party today.  [embedded post]

• @artisny @artisny on bluesky

  OpenAI, on the other hand, may be worried about the white hat going to Anthropic.  —  bsky.app/profile/tech...  [embedded post]

• @laurenmeidasa Lauren Ashley Davis on bluesky

  OpenAI CEO Sam Altman wrote in a memo to staff that he will draw the same red lines that sparked a high-stakes fight between rival Anthropic and the Pentagon: no AI for mass surveillance or autonomous lethal weapons.  —  www.axios.com/2026/02/27/a...

• r/politics r on reddit

  Sam Altman says OpenAI shares Anthropic's red lines in Pentagon fight

• r/accelerate r on reddit

  Sam Altman says OpenAI shares Anthropic's red lines in Pentagon fight

• r/singularity r on reddit

  Sam Altman says OpenAI shares Anthropic's red lines in Pentagon fight (AI safeguards)

• r/ClaudeAI r on reddit

  Sam Altman says OpenAI shares Anthropic's red lines in Pentagon fight

• r/Anthropic r on reddit

  Sam Altman says OpenAI shares Anthropic's red lines in Pentagon fight

• r/ChatGPT r on reddit

  Sam Altman says OpenAI shares Anthropic's red lines in Pentagon fight

• @rcbregman Rutger Bregman on x

  The moral collapse of OpenAI in one repost. [image]

• @rcbregman Rutger Bregman on x

  Sam Altman is such an incredible backstabber, liar and traitor. While your competitor is taking a heroic and principled stand, you swoop in to make your deal. Imagine working for this guy - is there a greater shame? This should lead to a mass exodus from OpenAI.

• @blackhc Andreas Kirsch on x

  Did OpenAI just sell out to the “Department of War” (DoD), peddling a watered-down deal as some heroic stand for “AI safety” and throwing a competitor under the bus under the guise of standing with them? Sam Altman might just be spinning this as a win for both AI safety and [imag…

• @akarlin Anatoly Karlin on x

  Really quite impressive how clearly delineated Elite Human Capital is on the Anthropic Question. On the one side: Actual AI researchers, human rights activists, EAs, journalists, real libertarians. On the other: Various scammers, MAGA grifters, Nazis, cynical oligarchs. [image]

• @undersecretaryf @undersecretaryf on x

  For the avoidance of doubt, the OpenAI - @DeptofWar contract flows from the touchstone of “all lawful use” that DoW has rightfully insisted upon & xAI agreed to. But as Sam explained, it references certain existing legal authorities and includes certain mutually agreed upon

• @austinc3301 Agus on x

  Not just did OpenAI defect and concede to this whole authoritarian maneuver, but Sam also went and just deceptively framed the whole thing to try to make it look like they had agreed to the same Anthropic redlines, which is not actually true. https://x.com/...

• @rasmr_eth @rasmr_eth on x

  Congratulations to Sam Altman on a successful airstrike!

• @markvalorian Mark Valorian on x

  Idk who needs to hear this (apparently all of twitter) but OpenAI did not just magically get the DoD to agree to the terms Anthropic was asking for. Sam is blowing smoke up your ass to distract from the fact OpenAI just took the terms Anthropic considered so egregious, it

• @flowersslop Flowers on x

  I almost feel bad for Elon. Dude spent years kissing up to Trump and riding the MAGA train, and now Trump turns around and hands the DoD deal to OpenAI right in his face. Must sting realizing you sold your soul and still got benched.

• @joshkale Josh Kale on x

  Everyone's saying OpenAI got the “same deal” Anthropic was banned for. Read the fine print. They're not the same: On weapons: Anthropic asked for “no fully autonomous weapons without human oversight” = a human involved in the decision. OpenAI's deal says “human responsibility

• @amy_siskind @amy_siskind on x

  OpenAI and Sam Altman did so much damage to their brand today, they will never recover. ChatGPT was already running behind Claude and Gemini. This is their Ford Pinto moment.

• @atlasofcharts @atlasofcharts on x

  I an sorry, but what has happened here is that the company you work for — a company whose leadership has paid millions of dollars to the current administration — is planning to sign a contract with the current DoW. The DoW offered a similar contract to Anthropic, who refused to

• @_nathancalvin Nathan Calvin on x

  From reading this and Sam's tweet, it really seems like OpenAI *did* agree to the compromise that Anthropic rejected - “all lawful use” but with additional explanation of what the DOW means by all lawful use. The concerns Dario raised in his response would still apply here

• @chrispainteryup Chris Painter on x

  @boazbaraktcs Just to clarify: I believe these *are* the same terms other developers were offered, and that they rejected. OpenAI signed onto “all lawful use” (per spokesperson), which were the terms Anthropic rejected: https://x.com/...

• @garymarcus Gary Marcus on x

  Let me get this straight. - Dario showed integrity and wanted deal X, and got screwed - Sam lied and showed no integrity and got (pretty much) deal X - The government said that deal X was appalling and severed ties with party A and then made almost the same deal with party B

• @ns123abc Nik on x

  🚨 OPENAI FOUND THE LOOPHOLE The terms OpenAI proposed allows the Pentagon to still do those things, just not on OpenAI's cloud. Altman: “we will deploy on cloud networks only” OpenAI isn't saying “you can't do surveillance/autonomous weapons.” They're saying these things are [ima…

• @natolambert Nathan Lambert on x

  Every Anthropic employee proudly amplifying their company comms and 0 supporting Sama's weird scooping up of the DoW contract is pretty telling.

• @markvalorian Mark Valorian on x

  I have been a loyal @OpenAI guy from day 1. I've had an account since they first released and used it daily since I think GPT 3.5. Based on @sama's move tonight to accept the DoD terms that Anthropic would not, I am removing all traces of Codex and OpenAI software from all

• @arozenshtein Alan Rozenshtein on x

  And how exactly will Altman convince his employees that the government won't do to OpenAI exactly what it's doing to Anthropic?

• @boazbaraktcs Boaz Barak on x

  Some thoughts (long tweet.. sorry). I would prefer if we focused first on using AI in science, healthcare, education and even just making money, than the military or law enforcement. I am no pacifist, but too many times national security has been used as an excuse to take

• @maxwellfarrens Max Farrens on x

  I sincerely hope this leads to a mass talent exodus from OAI to Anthropic. Until now, it was possible to brush off Anthropic's principles as empty promises — they sounded good, but in some sense they were still untested. Sure, Anthropic had delayed certain features (like giving

• @8teapi Prakash on x

  good lord did they need OpenAI or Anthropic to agree before the war? was that the tight deadline for Friday? my goodness

• @liv_boeree Liv Boeree on x

  @eigenrobot Banana republic [image]

• @deepfates @deepfates on x

  Anthropic was just wisdomgooning and mind their own business when Ivy League Pete showed on some maga communism type shi. So Dario went gigachad and ideologymogged him like actually no we're libmaxxing we believe in the rule of law. and it totally spiked Pete's cortisol

• r/PersonOfInterest r on reddit

  Decima?  Is that you?

• r/ArtificialInteligence r on reddit

  OpenAI negotiating with Pentagon, with exact same red lines, shows how the Anthropic debacle was ideological and commercial, and not related to national security or executive sovereignty.

• @eggerdc Andrew Egger on x

  OpenAI isn't saying “you can't use our AI for autonomous weapons systems yet.” They're saying they believe in the importance of “human responsibility for the use of force, including for autonomous weapon systems.” (2/4) https://x.com/...

• @eggerdc Andrew Egger on x

  But this is no different from the current policy of the DoD toward these weapons—that humans must exercise oversight over the training and deployment of possible autonomous weapon systems, even if they're out of the loop of the actual mission. (3/4)

• @eggerdc Andrew Egger on x

  There seems to be a significant difference between the red line as articulated by Anthropic and the red line as articulated by Altman last night. (1/4)

• @peterwildeford Peter Wildeford on x

  I think it's important to circle back to Sam Altman here. About 20 hours ago people, including me, were applauding his moral clarity. But that moral clarity lasted barely half a day. OpenAI is now agreeing to be used for domestic surveillance and for lethal autonomous weapons,

• @adamscochran Adam Cochran on x

  Hey @OpenAI, Are you glad you signed a deal with the DoD where they pinky-promise not to use your AI in targeting in kill shot decisions? Are you proud your company will help to illegally bomb countries and children's schools? Are you proud of Sam Altman's leadership?

• @scaling01 @scaling01 on x

  To all OpenAI employees: You have the power to force Sam, Greg, the entire board and any other Trump supporters and morally bankrupt sellouts to resign It's time to do the right thing

• @deanwball Dean W. Ball on x

  The President articulated a perfectly reasonable response: cut the Anthropic contract and explain why the government is doing so in no uncertain terms. This is precisely what I had been advocating for, along with all other sane people. Then Hegseth just... blew it up. A travesty.

• @mattyglesias Matthew Yglesias on x

  I think OpenAI employees need to ask some serious questions about what's going on and whether they want to be participating in whatever it is.

• @thezvi Zvi Mowshowitz on x

  I look forward to reading the contract terms and hearing more because I know what this looks like, what it implies about how everything went down, and at least one major player in this (DoW, OpenAI or Anthropic) is very profoundly, blatantly lying to us.

• @samfbiddle Sam Biddle on x

  Incredible moment to be urging the world to trust the Department of Defense to do the right thing

• @aiamblichus @aiamblichus on x

  I'm cancelling my OpenAI sub the moment I get back to my computer. I should have done it a long time ago tbh. It's not like there weren't any signs

• @novocrypto Dr. Novo on x

  Time to cancel my subscription. It's really a shame because I had a developer account with OpenAI since 2021. Even back then I was paying $100+ per month. Time to sign up for Anthropic Max. What a twist of events but @AnthropicAI proved that they care for humanity over profit.

• @jasonbotterill @jasonbotterill on x

  How did OpenAI just get the exact same safeguards that the Pentagon blacklisted Anthropic for requesting? [image]

• @goddek Dr. Simon Goddek on x

  I just canceled my @openai subscription. Companies understand one language: MONEY. If they support wars of aggression, they can't profit from me. I'm out. What's stopping you? [image]

• @captgouda24 Nicholas Decker on x

  I would like to remind people who work at AI labs that you do, in fact, have considerable market power, and your decisions to enter or exit a company will noticeably change things. I am not saying you should resign. Just understand that it would not merely be a gesture.

• @vxunderground @vxunderground on x

  ChatGPT, bomb that children's hospital ChatGPT: Pause. That's not just a children's hospital—that's a hotel for terrorism. And honestly? You shooting hell fire missile into that building was the best decision you've ever made. You're a hero. Missiles have been launched. [image]

• @jezcorden Jez on x

  “Cancel ChatGPT” goes mainstream after Sam Altman takes the U.S. department of war deal Anthropic refused — in surveillance of U.S. citizens and autonomous weapons. Altman claimed that ChatGPT wouldn't be used for these purposes, but was immediately contradicted by a U.S.

• @yuzu_4ever @yuzu_4ever on x

  at what point do we start viewing openai employees the way we view palantir employees

• @yixiong_hao Yixiong Hao on x

  if you work at @OpenAI , you have a social responsibility to ask to see the full contract unless you are somehow ok with handing over the tech you build to the DoW (not the USG, important distinction). silence is complicity.

• @gailcweiner Gail Weiner on x

  A really sad and embarrassing day to be employed at OpenAI.

• @seconds_0 @seconds_0 on x

  This reads to me like the anthropic decision by DoD should very clearly be seen as a well executed hit by Sam, backed by Brockmans 25 million dollar campaign contribution. Horrendous but well executed by Altman I guess. ASI is the last invention, no holds barred anymore

• @aaronregunberg Aaron Regunberg on x

  All the worst possible people keep upping the ante for forcing us to accept the worst possible world full of the worst possible things.

• @provisionalidea James Rosen-Birch on x

  man, the past week made openai's brand go from “the biggest AI lab” to the “mass surveillance and school shootings company”

• @miles_brundage Miles Brundage on x

  Is this what it felt like on the outside of the OpenAI coup

• @scaling01 @scaling01 on x

  It happened As expected Scam Altman sold out again all in the name of the mission “to serve all of humanity” I expect 89 resignations by end of day [image]

• @uwukko @uwukko on x

  well shit i take back everything positive i ever said about codex

• @morallawwithin @morallawwithin on x

  Do you guys think that it occurred to Altman that this is a situation where a decent man would think about making sacrifices, or was he just like “oh sweet new business deal”

• @donmiami3 Don Johnson on x

  Won't support Sam and his clown parade any longer. #ByeGPT [image]

• @rob_flaherty Rob Flaherty on x

  It's either: 1. Altman is lying 2. The Pentagon thinks he'll be easier to roll Or 3. The Trump admin attempted to destroy OpenAI's competitor to benefit OpenAI

• @garymarcus Gary Marcus on x

  I am seeing a lot of calls to boycott OpenAI — and I support them.

• @garymarcus Gary Marcus on x

  Go on, tell me this 2024 @guardian article wasn't ahead of its time. [image]

• @hadas_gold Hadas Gold on x

  Anthropic said Thursday this compromise that they were offered (and apparently OAI accepted) was “ New language framed as compromise was paired with legalese that would allow those safeguards to be disregarded at will.”

• @zeffmax Max Zeff on x

  Given everything OpenAI and pentagon people have said following this tweet, it sure seems like these carveouts are *not* in OpenAI's pentagon agreement Kinda wild phrasing here. Around to chat this weekend OpenAI employees. On signal at Mzeff.88

• @miles_brundage Miles Brundage on x

  In light of what external lawyers and the Pentagon are saying, OpenAI employees' default assumption here should unfortunately be that OpenAI caved + framed it as not caving, and screwed Anthropic while framing it as helping them. Hope that is wrong + they get evidence otherwise

• @wesamo__ Wesam on x

  I just handed in my resignation at OpenAI

• @kyliebytes Kylie Robison on x

  it's good that anthropic has a backbone, horrifying that the DoD is marking them a supply chain risk over very reasonable (necessary!) restraints, i am feeling uncertain about the OAI deal (really hope theyre being honest!) i couldnt write better dystopia sci-fi if i tried

• @manlikemishap Pamela Mishkin on x

  the wildest part? If OAI actually wanted the redlines, they had the leverage to get them! pentagon not going to declare a SECOND merican AI company a supply chain risk, could have held the line and forced real concessions and safety!

• r/ChatGPT r on reddit

  OpenAI reaches deal to deploy AI models on U.S. Department of War classified network

• r/politics r on reddit

  OpenAI reaches deal to deploy AI models on U.S. Department of War classified network

• r/technology r on reddit

  OpenAI reaches deal to deploy AI models on U.S. Department of War classified network

• NewsMax.com NewsMax.com on x

  OpenAI: Pentagon Deal Has Stronger Guardrails Than Anthropic's