/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Preliminary findings: the EU says Meta's pay or consent ad model breaches the DMA; Meta faces a fine of up to 10% of its global annual turnover if found guilty

Reuters Foo Yun Chee

Discussion

  • @migueldeicaza Miguel de Icaza on threads
    The EU has legislated that companies should produce cakes that can be kept and eaten at the same time.  Failure to deliver comes with a 10% global revenue hit.
  • @xzed87 @xzed87 on threads
    My guess is Meta will just increase ad load if you opt out.  The experience will feel degraded, and many will revert back to opting in.
  • @benedictevans Benedict Evans on threads
    The important thing here is the concept that government has any role at all to play in deciding what price a private company charges for its product.  That is, by default, treating this as a sort of regulated utility.
  • @eric_seufert Eric Benjamin Seufert on threads
    The EC's determination in the case of Meta's use of “pay or okay” — that a third, suboptimally-monetized version of the service be offered if advertising and subscriptions are the monetization mechanics chosen to support the business — imposes the requirement that the gatekeeper …
  • @mbarczentewicz Mikołaj Barczentewicz on threads
    In a new substack on “pay or OK,” I sketch out the options being discussed by EU officials and academics on how to assess what is an “appropriate fee” (e.g. to be charged for the “no ads” tier by Facebook).  I discuss cost-plus, foregone revenue, willigness to pay, capacity to pa…
  • @flasheeto @flasheeto on threads
    1/2 🧵 Just read the EC's disappointing preliminary findings regarding Meta's ads-or-subscribe business model (which I helped design).  In sports, fairness and competition are improved by creating conditions for weaker teams to improve, rather than dismantling stronger teams. …
  • @benedictevans Benedict Evans on threads
    The interesting problem is that the EU is telling Meta that it must offer a product that 1: does not use relevant ads and 2: that has an equivalent experience... B+ut a product with irrelevant ads is not equivalent to one with with relevant ads. it's worse.
  • @benedictevans Benedict Evans on threads
    So... Meta is allowed to charge, or use interest based advertising, but must also offer the product entirely for free.  Why?  Of course, the model the EU is objecting to here is one that's been used without controversy by a whole bunch of European newspapers for years now.  Is th…
  • @hotsaucechris Chris Sarbora on threads
    I'm gonna laugh really hard if Meta decides “alright, we'll shut off Facebook and Instagram for the EU and see who feels the pressure first”
  • @cwgo Chris Go on threads
    So spotify must be charged too.  Bec either you go premium without ads or free with ads...
  • @mwi.invest @mwi.invest on threads
    Meta should consider introducing those annoying unskippable ads in the EU for users who do not consent to sharing their data for personalized/targeted ads.  Also, I find it ridiculous that the European Commission is against Subscription for No Ads! …
  • @andrewpardoe Andrew Pardoe on threads
    Is the EU's position really “supply Facebook without a revenue source”?  This isn't my area: I have little stake in this (except for the obvious.)  What incentive would Meta have to continue in the EU?  Or any other ad-supported business, for that matter?
  • @mbarczentewicz Mikołaj Barczentewicz on threads
    I agree with you.  I also think that the public utility model is not workable for digital services.  It's an interesting situation to observe because privacy authorities are (still) quite apprehensive about the consequences of this approach and seem not to want to be perceived as…
  • @LukaszOlejnik@mastodon.social Lukasz Olejnik on mastodon
    Meta claims that the “ad-free subscription” (Pay-or-Consent) model has been “approved” by the Court of Justice of the European Union (indeed ot opined on the matter).  It states that this model is compatible with the DMA.  An interesting case developing.  Very well.
  • @maik.zumstrull.net Maik Zumstrull on bluesky
    The elephant in the room on this is that hundreds of EU based press outlets are illegally using pay-or-accept on their websites.  —  By citing the DMA as the issue, and not the more appropriate GDPR, they can avoid enforcing the law against their client media - which aren't DMA g…
  • @id_aa_carmack John Carmack on x
    @TimSweeneyEpic ... That is an anti-consumer-liberty position that I can't get behind. The condescension that the little people can't possibly understand what they are trading, so the government must remove the choice from them, should grate.
  • @timsweeneyepic Tim Sweeney on x
    I think the EU ruling on Meta is sound, at least because Meta is using the fee (which they don't WANT users to pay) to coerce users into sharing massive amounts of personal data.  Law shouldn't treat personal data and money as interchangeable.
  • @timsweeneyepic Tim Sweeney on x
    @Florian4Gamers ... I support Facebook's right to charge everyone a fee if they choose, and so does the DMA law. It's the hand-over-your-data-or-a-kidney gambit that's being challenged. There are certain bargains that companies must not be allowed to enter into, even with willing…
  • @profthomlambert Thom Lambert on x
    This is nuts. Who is ever going to create an offering if they can collect no value from it? It's no wonder Europe has no tech industry.
  • @timsweeneyepic Tim Sweeney on x
    Imagine if Facebook required users to either pay $10/month, hand over their personal data, or give them a kidney.  Is that reasonable?  What's the fundamental difference in one's rights with respect to the most intimate details of their lives and a body part?
  • @timsweeneyepic Tim Sweeney on x
    Money is interchangeable with ordinary products and services like hamburgers and haircuts because such a transaction doesn't have a sweeping long term impact on the buyer's rights.  Personal data, health, and fundamental rights aren't interchangeable in this way.
  • @rao_hacker_one Arun Rao on x
    This is why many are advocating for tech companies to abandon the EU. “Give us your digital products for free, or at a vastly lowered price” isn't a viable plan for a continent. I'm fully in the “exit the EU” camp, but let's see what CEOs and boards decide over the next 2
  • @jamescz19 James Czerniawski on x
    Color me shocked, shocked! This power-tripping narcissist leveraged an anti-us-tech law to punish a US tech company. This logic is absurd, and no future company understandably would want to grow and be subjected to this - it would bankrupt companies. This is about control.
  • @alecstapp Alec Stapp on x
    What if instead of just suing American tech companies they built their own [A collage of recent Reuters headlines of EU actions against Apple, Meta, Microsoft, and Nvidia]
  • @eric_seufert Eric Seufert on x
    ...What the EC is saying is that firms must accept some sub-optimal profit margin in the case where users don't want 1) their data used for personalized advertising or 2) to pay for access.  The EC doesn't accept that a firm dictates the terms of accessing its service; it demands…
  • @thierrybreton Thierry Breton on x
    The #DMA is here to give back 🇪🇺 users the power to decide over their #data #Meta has forced millions of users across EU into a binary choice : “pay or consent”. In our preliminary conclusion this is a breach of the DMA. Today we take an important step to ensure Meta complies. [i…
  • @jason_kint Jason Kint on x
    HUGE FT scoop on EU regulators finding that Meta is violating the new DMA (gatekeeper law) by forcing users to subscribe/pay if they don't want Meta's ubiquitous surveillance of them. Meta's comment here is deceptive based on a non-binding comment deep in a prior option. /1 [imag…
  • @jason_kint Jason Kint on x
    Great. About time. It's been 6yrs of abuses of EU law. The 2019 German cartel office decision made it clear Meta's market power made it impossible for consent to be freely given. The sub role out was another delay tactic allowed by a non binding comment made by high court.
  • @tjasa_pet @tjasa_pet on x
    Not surprisingly, Commission's preliminary findings indicate Meta's pay or consent model does not comply with Article 5(2) DMA, as it fails to provide users with a less personalised but equivalent version of Meta's social networks.
  • @florian4gamers Florian Mueller on x
    Unlike the EU, Meta can't finance its service through taxes. That's why there has to be a working revenue model, some quid pro quo between Meta and users. The DMA doesn't outlaw letting users pay for services.
  • @jefflonsdale Jeff Lonsdale on x
    The question is how long can the EU fine these global tech companies on a percentage of their global revenue without them strategizing how to exit the market. The companies won't leave all at once, first they will offer nerfed products rather than leave a hole in the market for
  • @beuc @beuc on x
    Good news the @EU_Commission is taking enforcement action based on #DMA against Meta's pay-or-consent model! It comes on top of various, recent complaints the BEUC network launched against Meta for breaches of consumer law and data protection law. ➡️ https://www.beuc.eu/...
  • @vestager Margrethe Vestager on x
    📢We informed @Meta of our preliminary finding that its “pay or consent” model fails to comply with the Digital Markets Act 👉It forces users to consent to the combination of their personal data, and fails to provide a less personalised equivalent 📰 https://www.shorturl.at/jCj8Y
  • @eu_competition @eu_competition on x
    #EUCompetition #DMA #DigitalMarketsAct Commission 🇪🇺 sends preliminary findings to Meta over its “Pay or Consent” model for breach of the Digital Markets Act 👇 🔗➡️ https://europa.eu/!yjjm9k [image]
  • @eu_commission @eu_commission on x
    The “Pay or Consent” advertising model of Meta fails to comply with the Digital Markets Act.  Our preliminary findings show that this choice forces users to consent to the combination of their personal data and fails to provide them a less personalised but equivalent version of M…
  • r/technology r on reddit
    Meta accused of breaching EU antitrust rules over ad-supported subscription service