FDIC

The 2023 bank-failure response made the FDIC a focal point, while its recent coverage has shifted toward crypto banking and stablecoin rules under the GENIUS Act.

Who they are

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation is the U.S. banking regulator appearing in this coverage as both crisis receiver and rulemaker: it protected depositors and arranged asset sales after the failures of Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank and First Republic, and later shaped the terms under which banks and stablecoin issuers can participate in crypto-related activity.

The recent arc

Coverage peaked in 2023Q1 amid the regional-bank failures. The FDIC was named receiver when California regulators closed Silicon Valley Bank; it joined the Treasury and Federal Reserve in protecting SVB depositors, sold Signature Bank branches to Flagstar Bank, and oversaw First Citizens’ purchase of SVB’s commercial banking business and JPMorgan Chase’s acquisition of most of First Republic.

The later arc moved from bank-resolution mechanics to digital-asset policy and access. Coinbase sued the FDIC over FOIA requests and later said released documents showed crypto businesses had been walled off from banking; in 2025 the agency said banks could undertake crypto and other lawful activities without prior approval if risks are managed, alongside related Federal Reserve and OCC changes. Recent stories add Senate-confirmed FDIC leader Travis Hill, Erebor’s FDIC approval, and an April 2026 proposal implementing a stablecoin-issuer framework under the GENIUS Act.

The tension

The central tension is between prudential safeguards and the banking system’s opening to crypto. Coinbase’s allegations portray the FDIC as having constrained banking access, while the agency’s newer crypto guidance and the Federal Reserve’s withdrawal of prior approval requirements suggest a less permission-based posture; the proposed stablecoin rules show that greater access remains paired with reserve-asset and issuer requirements.

Why it matters

If this trajectory holds, the FDIC’s relevance to digital assets will increasingly rest not only on handling failed banks but on defining the regulated path into banking for crypto firms, stablecoin issuers and new lenders such as Erebor and Square Financial Services. The unresolved question is whether the new framework can expand participation while maintaining the risk controls made salient by the 2023 failures.

Related: SVB · Silicon Valley Bank · Fed · The US Treasury, Federal Reserve, and the FDIC say all Silicon Valley · Coinbase files two lawsuits against the US SEC and the FDIC for not co · The FDIC plans to sell all of Signature Bank's 40 branches to Flagstar