/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Investigation: 32 US brokers are selling overlapping datasets with ~2.9B profiles of people pegged as “actively pregnant” or “shopping for maternity products”

Gizmodo identified 32 brokers selling data on 2.9 billion profiles of U.S. residents pegged as … Tweets: @swodinsky , @jjvincent , @swodinsky , @caitlinrcruz , @spekulation , @robinberjon , @andrewcouts , and @swodinsky Tweets: Shoshana Wodinsky / @swodinsky : there were 32 brokers and i spent like *literal days* trying to wrestle *some* sort of intel on data sources from each of them. even then, there were 13 that i just needed to throw up my hands and 🤷🏻‍♀ ️🤷🏻‍♀ ️🤷🏻‍♀ ️🤷🏻‍♀ ️🤷🏻‍♀ ️ James Vincent / @jjvincent : the US data broker market is frightening: collecting vast amounts of information; totally unregulated; and able to support all sorts of inferences. particularly frightening are the companies selling data on pregnant users following the demise of Roe v Wade https://gizmodo.com/... Shoshana Wodinsky / @swodinsky : i mean, apps in general aren't the only culprit—they never were. web activity and retail transactions were much more popular targets among the brokers we found (but there's still some...... p significant gaps! this kind of research is *hard*) Caitlin Cruz / @caitlinrcruz : Gizmodo identified 32 brokers selling data on 2.9 billion profiles of U.S. residents pegged as “actively pregnant” or “shopping for maternity products.” https://gizmodo.com/... Spek / @spekulation : We live in hell. https://twitter.com/... Robin Berjon / @robinberjon : “Multiple brokers are likely hawking the same information, as half the world does not live in the United States, and half the world is not pregnant.” It's hard to tell if data brokerage is worse when the data is right or when it's wrong. https://twitter.com/... Andrew Couts / @andrewcouts : well goddamn. @swodinsky @KyleBarr5 and @blakersdozen with the canons and the receipts. https://twitter.com/... Shoshana Wodinsky / @swodinsky : my last major scoop for gizmodo is out 🥲🥲🥲 @KyleBarr5 and i found dozens of brokers selling data from people who were presumed to be pregnant—so we went down the rabbit hole sussing out where this data was coming from turns out period trackers aren't the (only) culprit! https://twitter.com/...

Gizmodo

Context & Ripple Effects

The investigation places pregnancy-related targeting inside a broker ecosystem that was already broad enough for Vermont’s registry to list 121 U.S. data brokers. Its finding that brokers infer the label from web activity, retail transactions, and period trackers shows that sensitive classifications do not depend on a single source.

Earlier coverage documented sensitive information flowing from apps through Facebook’s analytics SDK, including signals of an intent to get pregnant. A single broker’s decision to stop selling visits to family-planning centers, such as SafeGraph’s withdrawal, does not address overlapping profile inventories sold elsewhere.

First-order effects

  • People labeled as pregnant or maternity shoppers are exposed to resale through multiple broker datasets, rather than a single identifiable seller.
  • The 32 brokers face immediate scrutiny over how they source, infer, and market pregnancy-related classifications in a largely unregulated market.

Second-order effects

  • App, web, retail, and period-tracker data suppliers become more consequential to broker customers because each can feed the same sensitive audience label.
  • Voluntary restrictions by individual sellers have limited reach when overlapping datasets let buyers seek comparable pregnancy-related profiles from other brokers.

Third-order effects

  • If inference from ordinary commercial signals remains saleable, privacy risk will increasingly attach to derived health and reproductive categories, not only to explicitly supplied medical data.
  • The pattern points toward a data-broker market in which transparency and controls must cover collection, aggregation, and audience inference together rather than individual data sales.

The trend: Sensitive personal-data markets are shifting from selling raw behavioral signals to selling inferred audience categories assembled across many intermediaries.

Discussion

  • @swodinsky Shoshana Wodinsky on x
    there were 32 brokers and i spent like *literal days* trying to wrestle *some* sort of intel on data sources from each of them. even then, there were 13 that i just needed to throw up my hands and 🤷🏻‍♀ ️🤷🏻‍♀ ️🤷🏻‍♀ ️🤷🏻‍♀ ️🤷🏻‍♀ ️
  • @robinberjon Robin Berjon on x
    “Multiple brokers are likely hawking the same information, as half the world does not live in the United States, and half the world is not pregnant.” It's hard to tell if data brokerage is worse when the data is right or when it's wrong. https://twitter.com/...
  • @jjvincent James Vincent on x
    the US data broker market is frightening: collecting vast amounts of information; totally unregulated; and able to support all sorts of inferences. particularly frightening are the companies selling data on pregnant users following the demise of Roe v Wade https://gizmodo.com/...
  • @swodinsky Shoshana Wodinsky on x
    i mean, apps in general aren't the only culprit—they never were. web activity and retail transactions were much more popular targets among the brokers we found (but there's still some...... p significant gaps! this kind of research is *hard*)
  • @caitlinrcruz Caitlin Cruz on x
    Gizmodo identified 32 brokers selling data on 2.9 billion profiles of U.S. residents pegged as “actively pregnant” or “shopping for maternity products.” https://gizmodo.com/...
  • @andrewcouts Andrew Couts on x
    well goddamn. @swodinsky @KyleBarr5 and @blakersdozen with the canons and the receipts. https://twitter.com/...
  • @swodinsky Shoshana Wodinsky on x
    my last major scoop for gizmodo is out 🥲🥲🥲 @KyleBarr5 and i found dozens of brokers selling data from people who were presumed to be pregnant—so we went down the rabbit hole sussing out where this data was coming from turns out period trackers aren't the (only) culprit! https://t…
  • @spekulation Spek on x
    We live in hell. https://twitter.com/...