/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Intel details its new bitcoin mining Bonanza Mine ASICs, claiming 300 of the chips consume 3,600 watts and deliver up to 40 terahashes per second of performance

Intel's 3,600-watt Bitcoin-mining powerhouse  —  At ISSCC 2022, Intel shared the deep-dive details of its new Bitcoin-mining Bonanza Mine ASICs

Tom's Hardware Paul Alcorn

Context & Ripple Effects

Intel had just created a Custom Compute Group for blockchain hardware and named Block, Argo, and Griid as mining-chip customers. The Bonanza Mine disclosure turns that launch plan into a concrete power-and-performance proposition for those buyers.

The longer arc is brief: Intel later ended its Blockscale mining-ASIC line without naming successors, underscoring how difficult it was to sustain a dedicated challenge in a market previously described as dominated by Bitmain and Canaan Creative.

First-order effects

  • Block, Argo, and Griid gain a stated benchmark for evaluating Intel's mining hardware: a 300-chip configuration rated at 40 terahashes per second while consuming 3,600 watts.
  • Intel can position Bonanza Mine as a purpose-built alternative to general-purpose compute for Bitcoin mining, with efficiency and aggregate throughput central to customer procurement.

Second-order effects

  • Bitmain and Canaan Creative face a new prospective ASIC supplier competing on miners' operating-power economics, while Samsung's ASIC manufacturing work illustrates that chip fabrication was also becoming relevant to the contest.
  • Mining customers evaluating Intel's chips must weigh a new supplier's claimed performance-per-watt against the established ASIC vendors' offerings, making power consumption a more explicit purchase criterion.

Third-order effects

  • Intel's later Blockscale exit suggests that publishing competitive ASIC specifications is easier than maintaining a durable specialized-mining product line; scale, customer commitments, and product continuity determine whether entrants alter market structure.
  • The episode fits a broader move toward workload-specific silicon, but its short product arc shows specialization does not automatically create a lasting business outside a chipmaker's core portfolio.

The trend: Bitcoin mining was becoming a proving ground for highly specialized, power-conscious silicon, even as sustaining a dedicated ASIC business remained difficult for new entrants.