/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Analysis: Apple Silicon averaged 19% GPU gains YoY for the past five years, and A15 grew 52%; since iPhone 5s, performance has grown 133% every four years

For years now, Apple's tight integration of its products and Apple Silicon have evolved in lockstep.

Creative Strategies Ben Bajarin

Context & Ripple Effects

The A15 launch cycle has been defined by disappointment on one axis and strength on another: initial benchmarks showed only a ~15% GPU and 10-18% CPU uplift over A14, while SemiAnalysis flagged that Apple reported no CPU gains at all for the first time, attributing it to an engineer exodus to Nuvia and Rivos.

This Creative Strategies analysis reframes the picture around the longer arc: averaging 19% annual GPU growth across five years, a 52% jump for A15, and a 133% performance doubling roughly every four years since iPhone 5s — echoing AnandTech's earlier finding of nearly 3x single-thread gains for A14 over five years. It argues the tight product-integration loop, not any single node, is what keeps compounding.

First-order effects

  • iPhone buyers see the gains concentrated where Apple still delivers: the A15's GPU step-up serves graphics-heavy apps while CPU progress has stalled, so the value proposition shifts toward efficiency and sustained performance rather than raw compute.
  • Apple's chip team faces the immediate cost of competing for engineers against Nuvia and Rivos, which is already visible in the flat CPU numbers on its newest flagship silicon.

Second-order effects

  • Rivals benchmarking against iPhone silicon now compete against a GPU curve growing ~19% annually — x86 incumbents, which AnandTech's A14 analysis already framed as vulnerable to Apple's efficiency lead, must answer on performance-per-watt rather than peak clocks.
  • Startup chipmakers like Nuvia and Rivos, by hiring away Apple silicon engineers, are effectively monetizing Apple's own training pipeline — raising Apple's retention costs and seeding future competitors with integrated-design expertise.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, mobile SoC leadership becomes less about headline CPU speed and more about which vendor's software-hardware integration sustains multi-year compounding across specialized blocks like GPUs — a structural advantage that favors vertically integrated players and pushes the industry toward workload-specific silicon.
  • Sustained talent raiding from Apple's chip group points toward a broader diffusion of integrated-design know-how across the industry, gradually eroding the moat that produced these compounding gains.

The trend: Smartphone silicon competition is shifting from raw CPU clock gains toward GPU and efficiency-per-watt differentiation, where tightly integrated design teams compound advantages year over year.

Discussion

  • @etherington Darrell Etherington on x
    Definitely going to make some epic dog videos with cinematic mode when my iPhone 13 Pro arrives. Check out @panzer 's deep dive on the tech that powers it: https://techcrunch.com/...
  • @panzer @panzer on x
    So, about Cinematic Mode. I went a bit deeper on the feature today including some interviews with the team at Apple that created it. https://twitter.com/...
  • @benbajarin Ben Bajarin on x
    I covered the angle of Apple silicon and iPhone 13. Doing some historical benchmark analysis with the A15 yielded some interesting observations. iPhone 13 and Apple Silicon https://t.co/0C2xy8PDvM
  • @ryanacash Ryan Cash on x
    Love @Austinmann's review of the iPhone 13 Pro camera. I can't believe this is an iPhone shot. I second his wishes, primarily #2 and #3. https://austinmann.com/... https://twitter.com/...
  • @benbajarin Ben Bajarin on x
    @daringfireball @gruber as I wrote, another thing missing is the average upgrade cycle is 3-4 years. Understanding the generational improvement over a 3-4 year cycle is the true insight IMO. I charted the performance over 3-4 year time spans in that article. https://creativestrat…
  • @pschiller Philip Schiller on x
    Stunning review of the #Apple #iPhone13Pro camera system by @austinmann in #Tanzania https://austinmann.com/...
  • @halidecamera Halide on x
    We look forward to this all year. Here's @austinmann's incredible review of the new iPhone 13 Pro cameras. The shots are awe-inspiring, but don't miss the video either where he straps an iPhone 13 Pro to a helicopter(!). https://austinmann.com/...
  • @dhh @dhh on x
    iPhone 13 w/ A15 is the new web/JS performance champ [Speedometer 2.0]. Another +15% y/y gain. Fastest Android is almost 3x slower 🙈. Also, Chrome 93 is faster than Safari 15 on the M1, killing the excuse this is about software integration. Nope. Just insane CPU lead. https://twi…