/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Twitter launches Super Follows for iOS, letting a select group of US test users charge either $2.99, $4.99, or $9.99 per month for their tweets

Kait Sanchez / The Verge :

The Verge Kait Sanchez

Context & Ripple Effects

Twitter first sketched out Super Follows alongside Communities in February, then opened applications in June for a small test group of Ticketed Spaces and Super Follows users who keep 97% of revenue after app-store fees if they earn under $50K. Today's launch moves that plan onto real iPhones: a select group of US testers can now actually charge followers $2.99, $4.99, or $9.99 per month.

First-order effects

  • The chosen US test creators gain a direct monthly revenue line attached to their tweets, at three fixed price points rather than self-set pricing.
  • Twitter gets its first live consumer-payments product on iOS, with app-store cuts and its own revenue split applying before creators see anything.

Second-order effects

  • The June revenue-share terms (97% to creators under $50K) become the public benchmark against which every other platform's creator payouts get compared, pressuring rivals to match or beat the split.
  • Ticketed Spaces and Super Follows now run as a paired monetization track, so Twitter's application pipeline filters one cohort of paid creators into both products — and within weeks of this launch Twitter widened eligibility, rolling Super Follows out globally on iOS after limiting it to US and Canada.

Third-order effects

  • A subscription line item gives Twitter a revenue stream that doesn't depend on the ad market it tested back in 2017 with its $99/month promoted-tweets experiment, nudging the company's business model from pure advertising toward mixed monetization.
  • If fixed price tiers prove too coarse, expect pressure toward flexible creator-set pricing and richer subscriber perks (the Communities feature announced alongside Super Follows is the natural container for members-only spaces).

The trend: Social platforms are layering direct fan-payment products over free feeds, with revenue-share percentages becoming the competitive lever that determines which platform creators commit to.

Discussion

  • @wongmjane Jane Manchun Wong on x
    Each Super Follow is an In-App Purchase on the App Store, but because there are too many IAPs for the Twitter app, the App Store only shows 10 instead of the full list https://twitter.com/...
  • @keleftheriou Kosta Eleftheriou on x
    Oh my word, this is REAL! Apple's IAP system is so... innovative?👏 https://twitter.com/...
  • @dewenjoyer Dew on x
    If this rolls out this is literally the only thing I'll tweet using this feature https://twitter.com/... https://twitter.com/...
  • @veeren_jubbal Veerender Jubbal on x
    Nobody on Twitter is worth a super follow. Zero hyperbole. https://twitter.com/...
  • @buzz Buzz Andersen on x
    This is bonkers and really illustrates the ways that Apple's IAP rules severely constrain the possible business models on its platform. https://twitter.com/...
  • @farfromsubtle Fraser Agar on x
    Saw that Twitter only wants a 3% cut so for a second I started to consider it was an additional convenient way for people to be Patrons, but then I saw that Apple takes 30% if it is done through the app. https://twitter.com/...
  • @grady_booch Grady Booch on x
    All of my tweets are equally super, and I have no desire to monetize any of them. https://twitter.com/...
  • @krzyzanowskim Marcin Krzyzanowski on x
    is what? 🤪🙃 obviously, because it has to be IAP so how else could it be done. I wait until it reaches AppStore IAP internal limit of available IAP slots per app, something like 65536 or something https://twitter.com/...