/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Apple's updated rules allowing web signup links appear to apply only to apps that don't make much money for Apple, like Netflix and Spotify

It's for apps that don't make Apple any money anyways  —  While vocal app developers accused Apple last week of spinning a lawsuit settlement …

The Verge

Context & Ripple Effects

A week after developers dismissed Apple's settlement "clarifications", The Verge's read of the updated rules is that they are narrower than they look: web signup links are allowed, but mainly for apps like Netflix and Spotify that already steer subscriptions off the App Store, meaning Apple forgoes little commission it was actually collecting.

The carve-out matters because it previews how Apple would keep writing payment rules: the later US App Store filing explicitly excludes apps in Apple's own Video Partner and News Partner programs, and the 2025 approval of Spotify's external-payment update came only after years of pressure — a slow, selective loosening rather than an opening.

First-order effects

  • Netflix and Spotify can keep web-based signup flows in their iOS apps without paying Apple's commission, but the exemption covers apps Apple barely earns from — developers whose revenue Apple does take gain nothing from this update.

Second-order effects

  • Apps in categories where Apple's cut is real are pushed toward the workaround Spotify eventually chose elsewhere: when rules got tight, Spotify simply removed audiobook purchasing from its iOS app rather than pay, showing developers will cut features before conceding the take rate.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds — exemptions keyed to Apple's revenue relationships and partner programs — App Store payment rules harden into a two-tier structure where Apple's commercial partners keep their commissions while everyone else litigates or lobbies for the same terms.

The trend: Apple is conceding external payments app by app and category by category, under legal and regulatory pressure, rather than reforming the App Store take rate wholesale.

Discussion

  • @backlon Dieter Bohn on x
    There are just as many questions as answers: - Does Apple still get to define “reader” app by fiat? - Can apps explicitly mention payment or price or is that muzzled? - One link - where does it go? Are there rules? https://www.apple.com/...
  • @zsk Zoe Kleinman on x
    Anyone else think the App Store gravy train (as its critics say) may be applying the brakes before it's derailed? Will be v interesting to see the Epic/Apple verdict, when it comes https://www.theverge.com/...
  • @backlon Dieter Bohn on x
    In any case, the so-called anti-steering rule that didn't allow apps to acknowledge the existence of anything outside the app store for account sign up is one of the most outlandish and happy to see even what seems to be a softening of it.
  • @stephennellis Stephen Nellis on x
    What's the difference between a reader app and a game? In the end, it's whatever Apple decides it is. (Ok, there are rules, but Apple can and does change them.) https://twitter.com/...
  • @backlon Dieter Bohn on x
    How many “reader” apps are there in the App Store? - Is there a list? - Can developers challenge their designated category? - Why is this rule limited to “reader” apps? - Why does the “reader app” distinction exist?
  • @backlon Dieter Bohn on x
    Also, remember: the text of the policy is only part of the policy. How it is *interpreted* and *enforced* matters just as much. We were here just over a year ago: https://www.theverge.com/... https://twitter.com/...
  • @martinsfp Martin Sfp Bryant on x
    As they are gradually unpicked, Apple's App Store rules just look ever more ridiculous. https://twitter.com/...