/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← β†’ days Β· ↑ ↓ browse Β· Enter similar Β· o open

FTC files a new antitrust complaint against Facebook, after a judge dismissed the first complaint in June; Facebook has until October 4 to respond

This article is an on-site version of our Unhedged newsletter. Tweets: @fbnewsroom : We are reviewing the FTC's amended complaint and will have more to say soon. Lina Khan / @linakhanftc : FTC Alleges Facebook Resorted to Illegal Buy-or-Bury Scheme to Crush Competition After String of Failed Attempts to Innovate https://www.ftc.gov/... Jason Kint / @jason_kint : OK, whew. I've now read all 80 pages of amended FTC suit v Facebook and run a redline from original complaint. In four words, Facebook is royally screwed. Deeper dive coming: Put simply, FTC has delivered on request from Judge to show market power and revised tons of material. @ftc : β€œFacebook lacked the business acumen and technical talent to survive the transition to mobile. After failing to compete with new innovators, Facebook illegally bought or buried them when their popularity became an existential threat,” said Holly Vedova, FTC BC Acting Dir. @ftc : FTC alleges Facebook resorted to illegal buy-or-bury scheme to crush competition after string of failed attempts to innovate: https://www.ftc.gov/... Eric Seufert / @eric_seufert : WhatsApp's founders left Facebook *because* Facebook made plans to integrate ads into WhatsApp. But sure, WhatsApp could have β€œcompeted” with Facebook on the basis of ad inventory. Whatever that means. https://twitter.com/... @leah_nylen : On the recusal: β€œThe FTC's Office of General Counsel carefully reviewed Facebook's petition to recuse Chair Lina M. Khan. As the case will be prosecuted before a federal judge, the appropriate constitutional due process protections will be provided to the company.” Cecilia Kang / @ceciliakang : BREAKING: U.S. Takes a New Stab at Facebook Antitrust Suit Seeking Break Up. FTC Claims Facebook Tried To Maintain Monopoly Through Acquisitions and Blocking Competitors Story developing.... https://www.nytimes.com/... Cecilia Kang / @ceciliakang : so it appears FTC is no longer claiming 60 percent control of personal social networking? Adam Kovacevich / @adamkovac : Put differently, it's designed to make FB's critics πŸ‘, not designed to overcome Judge Boasberg's criticisms. @johnmarknewman : I'd frankly be shocked to see this complaint dismissed. This is almost certainly headed to trial. Mike Rundle / @flyosity : Even FTC is calling out Facebook for those years they tried to get by with a shitty hybrid app instead of just writing a good native one 🀑 https://twitter.com/... @public_citizen : Facebook desperately needs to be broken up. This is excellent news from the FTC. Instagram and WhatsApp acquisitions were specifically designed to solidify Facebook's dominance - exactly what antitrust law was designed to prevent. Break them up. And Congress needs to act, too. https://twitter.com/... Ron Knox / @ronmknox : 3. Now it has. The new complaint uses the most direct evidence of market share I could imagine: monthly users. The complaint says FB has tens of millions more monthly users than its next-biggest rival, Snapchat. Which raises the question: Is Snapchat its next biggest rival? @econliberties : The @FTC's amended complaint against @Facebook includes detailed proof of @Facebook's >60% market share & lays out the anticompetitive tactics they've used to grow their power. As @PharmaCheats puts it, β€œIn this [new] complaint, the FTC shows its work.” https://www.marketwatch.com/ ... Ron Knox / @ronmknox : 4. Could be a crucial question. The FTC in the lawsuit explains in some detail how other things we'd probably think of as vaguely β€œsocial media” - Twitter and Tiktok - aren't actually Facebook's rivals, because they aren't used for the same purpose. And I think that's true. Richard Blumenthal / @senblumenthal : The antitrust case against Facebook should've been open-and-shutβ€”the court's decision against the FTC was wrongly-decided & a warning alarm that our antitrust laws are broken. I commend @linakhanFTC for continuing this fight despite fierce resistance from Facebook & its allies. https://twitter.com/... Rep. Pramila Jayapal / @repjayapal : Glad to see @linakhanFTC and @FTC continuing to hold tech giants like Facebook accountable while taking on their monopolistic practices. By reining in anti-competitive behavior, we can protect consumers, innovation, small businesses, and our democracy. https://twitter.com/... Sean Casten / @seancasten : There was a story making the rounds this morning about VR meetings. But make no mistake, this is the far more important Facebook news today: https://twitter.com/... Ron Knox / @ronmknox : 6. But the more important question is whether the FTC has show enough clear anticompetitive conduct, in FB's aggressive acquisition of Insta and WhatsApp, to avoid the question of what the market actually is. @openmarkets : By refiling its case against @Facebook, the @FTC has demonstrated that the federal government will no longer sit by as #BigTech companies engage in illegal monopolization practices. .πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘ πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘ .πŸ‘Thank you, @FTC πŸ‘ .πŸ‘& @linakhanftc! πŸ‘ .πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘ πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘ Ron Knox / @ronmknox : 2. The FTC's first lawsuit failed because the judge in the case said the FTC needed to show evidence of monopolization in its initial complaint. That's not how the process is supposed to work, but so be it. The FTC was asked essentially to go back and show its work. @accountabletech : The new @FTC complaint gets straight to the heart of the matter: β€œFacebook monetizes its personal social networking monopoly principally by selling surveillance-based advertising.” #BanSurveillanceAdvertising https://twitter.com/... Amy Klobuchar / @amyklobuchar : Facebook's long history of anticompetitive behavior is no secret. I'm glad the FTC is taking renewed action and I encourage them to continue to consider all available options under the law to hold Facebook accountable. https://twitter.com/... Adam Kovacevich / @adamkovac : Reading this revised FTC FB complaint, one thing that comes through is that's long on recycled rhetorical arguments against FB, and short on the legal substance of proving a market dominance that FB's Insta and Whatsapp acquisitions caused. https://twitter.com/... Lance Ulanoff / @lanceulanoff : It's a longer complaint (by almost 30 pages) but maintains most of the core arguments revolving around WhatsApp + Instagram acquisitions and how Facebook constrained competitive access to its APIs and interface https://www.cnbc.com/... Gene Park / @genepark : damn this is more brutal than anything I've ever said lol https://twitter.com/... @breakupfbgoogle : Thank you @linakhanFTC for leading the @FTC to re-file its case against @Facebook & sending a clear signal to *all* Big Tech companies that their days of illegal monopolization practices are numbered. πŸ‘ Check out the letter we sent to Chair Khan today to learn more πŸ‘‡ https://twitter.com/... @johnmarknewman : Another theme that's emerging: FB β€œfailed” at competing on the merits, β€œfailure” to innovate, etc. The strategy, if I had to guess, is to disabuse the reader of any notion that FB got so big because it's just so darn great. The old complaint never used β€œfail__” in this way. https://twitter.com/... Ron Knox / @ronmknox : 5. That claim passes the smell test for me. I don't know anyone who could claim to use Twitter in the same way they use FB or Instagram. Tiktok is slightly different, though. Obviously FB/Insta has used its power to make a carbon copy of Tiktok, in Reels. We'll see. @johnmarknewman : Narratives are important in antitrust litigation. The new complaint adopts more of a narrative structure, by weaving the allegations of conditional dealing into the β€œIndustry Background” section. The old complaint focused more on FB's basic business model here. https://twitter.com/... Casey Newton / @caseynewton : @ceciliakang is there a single % in here they didn't redact? also why are they redacting Comscore data when anyone can buy it?

CNBC Lauren Feiner

Context & Ripple Effects

The FTC returned with an amended case after the court's June dismissal found its market-dominance allegations insufficient. Its July request for more time to refile showed the agency was rebuilding the complaint rather than abandoning it.

Related coverage identified measures such as time on-site and active users as possible ways to support the FTC's monopoly definition, making the revised pleading a test of whether those metrics can meet the court's standard.

First-order effects

  • Facebook must answer the amended FTC complaint by October 4, while the FTC gets a second opportunity to establish the market and dominance allegations the court previously rejected.
  • The litigation now centers more directly on the evidentiary case for Facebook's alleged monopoly, following the FTC's requested extension to prepare an updated suit.

Second-order effects

  • Facebook's defense will again contest the FTC's account of competition and consumer harm, a position it had already set out in its motion to dismiss the earlier suits.
  • The case raises the value of engagement and user-base measures as litigation evidence, because related coverage identified them as candidate metrics for defining the alleged monopoly.

Third-order effects

  • If courts accept a more fully supported market definition, antitrust enforcement against major platforms will depend less on filing a broad theory and more on proving dominance with platform-specific usage evidence.
  • The refile illustrates a more iterative enforcement model: agencies revise complaints around judicial pleading requirements before courts reach the underlying competition claims.

The trend: Platform antitrust cases are increasingly being shaped by the technical work of defining digital markets and proving dominance with usage metrics.

Discussion

  • @fbnewsroom @fbnewsroom on x
    We are reviewing the FTC's amended complaint and will have more to say soon.
  • @linakhanftc Lina Khan on x
    FTC Alleges Facebook Resorted to Illegal Buy-or-Bury Scheme to Crush Competition After String of Failed Attempts to Innovate https://www.ftc.gov/...
  • @ftc @ftc on x
    β€œFacebook lacked the business acumen and technical talent to survive the transition to mobile. After failing to compete with new innovators, Facebook illegally bought or buried them when their popularity became an existential threat,” said Holly Vedova, FTC BC Acting Dir.
  • @ftc @ftc on x
    FTC alleges Facebook resorted to illegal buy-or-bury scheme to crush competition after string of failed attempts to innovate: https://www.ftc.gov/...
  • @eric_seufert Eric Seufert on x
    WhatsApp's founders left Facebook *because* Facebook made plans to integrate ads into WhatsApp. But sure, WhatsApp could have β€œcompeted” with Facebook on the basis of ad inventory. Whatever that means. https://twitter.com/...
  • @leah_nylen @leah_nylen on x
    On the recusal: β€œThe FTC's Office of General Counsel carefully reviewed Facebook's petition to recuse Chair Lina M. Khan. As the case will be prosecuted before a federal judge, the appropriate constitutional due process protections will be provided to the company.”
  • @ceciliakang Cecilia Kang on x
    BREAKING: U.S. Takes a New Stab at Facebook Antitrust Suit Seeking Break Up. FTC Claims Facebook Tried To Maintain Monopoly Through Acquisitions and Blocking Competitors Story developing.... https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @adamkovac Adam Kovacevich on x
    Put differently, it's designed to make FB's critics πŸ‘, not designed to overcome Judge Boasberg's criticisms.
  • @johnmarknewman @johnmarknewman on x
    I'd frankly be shocked to see this complaint dismissed. This is almost certainly headed to trial.
  • @flyosity Mike Rundle on x
    Even FTC is calling out Facebook for those years they tried to get by with a shitty hybrid app instead of just writing a good native one 🀑 https://twitter.com/...
  • @public_citizen @public_citizen on x
    Facebook desperately needs to be broken up. This is excellent news from the FTC. Instagram and WhatsApp acquisitions were specifically designed to solidify Facebook's dominance - exactly what antitrust law was designed to prevent. Break them up. And Congress needs to act, too. ht…
  • @econliberties @econliberties on x
    The @FTC's amended complaint against @Facebook includes detailed proof of @Facebook's >60% market share & lays out the anticompetitive tactics they've used to grow their power. As @PharmaCheats puts it, β€œIn this [new] complaint, the FTC shows its work.” https://www.marketwatch.co…
  • @dada_drummer Damon K on x
    Cheering from the not-disinterested sidelines - as Facebook, so Spotify... https://twitter.com/...
  • @senblumenthal Richard Blumenthal on x
    The antitrust case against Facebook should've been open-and-shutβ€”the court's decision against the FTC was wrongly-decided & a warning alarm that our antitrust laws are broken. I commend @linakhanFTC for continuing this fight despite fierce resistance from Facebook & its allies. h…
  • @repjayapal Rep. Pramila Jayapal on x
    Glad to see @linakhanFTC and @FTC continuing to hold tech giants like Facebook accountable while taking on their monopolistic practices. By reining in anti-competitive behavior, we can protect consumers, innovation, small businesses, and our democracy. https://twitter.com/...
  • @seancasten Sean Casten on x
    There was a story making the rounds this morning about VR meetings. But make no mistake, this is the far more important Facebook news today: https://twitter.com/...
  • @openmarkets @openmarkets on x
    By refiling its case against @Facebook, the @FTC has demonstrated that the federal government will no longer sit by as #BigTech companies engage in illegal monopolization practices. .πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘ πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘ .πŸ‘Thank you, @FTC πŸ‘ .πŸ‘& @linakhanftc! πŸ‘ .πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘ πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘
  • @nytimesbusiness @nytimesbusiness on x
    The suit submitted Thursday contains the same overall arguments as the original. But it is much longer and includes more facts and analysis that the agency says better support its allegations that Facebook is a monopoly. https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • @accountabletech @accountabletech on x
    The new @FTC complaint gets straight to the heart of the matter: β€œFacebook monetizes its personal social networking monopoly principally by selling surveillance-based advertising.” #BanSurveillanceAdvertising https://twitter.com/...
  • @amyklobuchar Amy Klobuchar on x
    Facebook's long history of anticompetitive behavior is no secret. I'm glad the FTC is taking renewed action and I encourage them to continue to consider all available options under the law to hold Facebook accountable. https://twitter.com/...
  • @adamkovac Adam Kovacevich on x
    Reading this revised FTC FB complaint, one thing that comes through is that's long on recycled rhetorical arguments against FB, and short on the legal substance of proving a market dominance that FB's Insta and Whatsapp acquisitions caused. https://twitter.com/...
  • @lanceulanoff Lance Ulanoff on x
    It's a longer complaint (by almost 30 pages) but maintains most of the core arguments revolving around WhatsApp + Instagram acquisitions and how Facebook constrained competitive access to its APIs and interface https://www.cnbc.com/...
  • @genepark Gene Park on x
    damn this is more brutal than anything I've ever said lol https://twitter.com/...
  • @jason_kint Jason Kint on x
    Staying high-level before getting into specifics, the most noticeable changes to me were FTC bumping up the significance of the threat to Facebook in the consumer shift to mobile and how Facebook used anticompetitive behavior to mitigate it. /3
  • @breakupfbgoogle @breakupfbgoogle on x
    Thank you @linakhanFTC for leading the @FTC to re-file its case against @Facebook & sending a clear signal to *all* Big Tech companies that their days of illegal monopolization practices are numbered. πŸ‘ Check out the letter we sent to Chair Khan today to learn more πŸ‘‡ https://twit…
  • @johnmarknewman @johnmarknewman on x
    Another theme that's emerging: FB β€œfailed” at competing on the merits, β€œfailure” to innovate, etc. The strategy, if I had to guess, is to disabuse the reader of any notion that FB got so big because it's just so darn great. The old complaint never used β€œfail__” in this way. https…
  • @fightfortheftr @fightfortheftr on x
    An understatement, really. https://twitter.com/...
  • @jason_kint Jason Kint on x
    *This* was my fav addition to the Facebook lawsuit: (1) throws Zuckerberg's β€œmetaverse” FUD back at Facebook and (2) rightly points out to everyone that the company cannot be trusted as its own β€œrepresentations have proven meaningless on multiple occasions.” /7 https://twitter.co…
  • @johnmarknewman @johnmarknewman on x
    Narratives are important in antitrust litigation. The new complaint adopts more of a narrative structure, by weaving the allegations of conditional dealing into the β€œIndustry Background” section. The old complaint focused more on FB's basic business model here. https://twitter.co…
  • @th3j35t3r @th3j35t3r on x
    β€œFacebook lacked the business acumen and technical talent to survive the transition to mobile. After failing to compete with new innovators, Facebook illegally bought or buried them when their popularity became an existential threat.” https://www.ftc.gov/... https://twitter.com/.…
  • @jason_kint Jason Kint on x
    OK, whew. I've now read all 80 pages of amended FTC suit v Facebook and run a redline from original complaint. In four words, Facebook is royally screwed. Deeper dive coming: Put simply, FTC has delivered on request from Judge to show market power and revised tons of material.
  • @russellbrandom Russell Brandom on x
    It will be very interesting to see the FTC defend a concept of β€œsocial network” that includes Facebook, Instagram and Snapchat, but not Twitter, Reddit, or TikTok https://www.theverge.com/...
  • @ceciliakang Cecilia Kang on x
    so it appears FTC is no longer claiming 60 percent control of personal social networking?
  • @willoremus Will Oremus on x
    Is TikTok a social network? Is Snapchat? Is Facebook even a social network?? What is β€œsocial,” anyway? What's a network? WHAT IS ANYTHING Pls give definitive answers to each, all documented & accurate to n significant digits, or else FB has zero market power and there's no issue
  • @ronmknox Ron Knox on x
    3. Now it has. The new complaint uses the most direct evidence of market share I could imagine: monthly users. The complaint says FB has tens of millions more monthly users than its next-biggest rival, Snapchat. Which raises the question: Is Snapchat its next biggest rival?
  • @ronmknox Ron Knox on x
    4. Could be a crucial question. The FTC in the lawsuit explains in some detail how other things we'd probably think of as vaguely β€œsocial media” - Twitter and Tiktok - aren't actually Facebook's rivals, because they aren't used for the same purpose. And I think that's true.
  • @ronmknox Ron Knox on x
    6. But the more important question is whether the FTC has show enough clear anticompetitive conduct, in FB's aggressive acquisition of Insta and WhatsApp, to avoid the question of what the market actually is.
  • @ronmknox Ron Knox on x
    2. The FTC's first lawsuit failed because the judge in the case said the FTC needed to show evidence of monopolization in its initial complaint. That's not how the process is supposed to work, but so be it. The FTC was asked essentially to go back and show its work.
  • @willoremus Will Oremus on x
    Anyway my boring take on this is basically that Facebook offers a huge range of services, many of which face significant competition (e.g. live video, Stories, messaging) and a few for which there's no viable substitute (an interactive virtual directory of most U.S. adults)
  • @ronmknox Ron Knox on x
    5. That claim passes the smell test for me. I don't know anyone who could claim to use Twitter in the same way they use FB or Instagram. Tiktok is slightly different, though. Obviously FB/Insta has used its power to make a carbon copy of Tiktok, in Reels. We'll see.
  • @caseynewton Casey Newton on x
    @ceciliakang is there a single % in here they didn't redact? also why are they redacting Comscore data when anyone can buy it?
  • @leemakiyama Hosuk Lee-Makiyama on x
    Biden admin chooses to pursue antitrust cases rather than over-regulating the digital space. There is room for a small reflection here for Europe I think, on the primacy of antitrust for addressing market failures. https://www.wsj.com/...