/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Tax experts say that ransomware victims' ransom payments are probably tax deductible in the US, unless they were paid by an insurance company

Alan Suderman / Associated Press :

Associated Press Alan Suderman

Context & Ripple Effects

The ransomware economy has been mapped piece by piece in this coverage: data recovery firms quietly passing ransoms through to clients, cyber insurers found preferring to pay up even when backups existed, and the US Treasury warning facilitators about sanctions exposure. What was missing was the victim's own ledger entry — and this reporting supplies it: a ransom paid from the company's own funds is probably deductible as an ordinary business loss, while one paid by an insurer is not.

That distinction lands on top of an already active enforcement front. Treasury has been tightening the screws on anyone touching these payments, including forensics firms acting for victims, while its own data shows flagged payments are a small fraction of the estimated total flowing out.

First-order effects

  • Victims who pay ransoms directly now have a plausible path to recover part of the cost at tax time, softening the financial argument against paying — with average payments having climbed steeply across 2019, that deduction scales with the size of the demand.

Second-order effects

  • Cyber insurers gain a fresh selling point: a policy converts a non-deductible ransom into a covered claim handled by someone whose payment is structured differently, reinforcing the pattern where insurers prefer settling rather than funding lengthy recovery work.

Third-order effects

  • With Treasury already fining facilitators over sanctioned recipients and investigators tracing payments to Moscow-linked operators, a formal IRS position on deductibility would give policymakers a third lever — tax treatment — in the broader effort to reshape whether paying ransoms makes economic sense at all.

The trend: US authorities are approaching ransomware payments from every administrative angle at once — sanctions, financial surveillance, and now tax treatment — gradually raising the total cost of paying.

Discussion

  • @thegrugq Thaddeus E. Grugq on x
    And the 2021 winner for mixed messages is... https://twitter.com/...
  • @mikko @mikko on x
    Your support might be tax-deductible too ¹ ¹ This is not legal advice; Check with your lawyer; I am not your lawyer; I am not smart; https://www.fox2detroit.com/ ...
  • @gossithedog Kevin Beaumont on x
    We've got a long way to go on fixing this problem. https://twitter.com/...
  • @sosowski Sos Sosowski on x
    Which stage of capitalism is this? https://twitter.com/...
  • @xamat Xavier Amatriain on x
    Now we're talking 😳 https://twitter.com/...
  • @thegrugq Thaddeus E. Grugq on x
    Business idea: “Now offering custom tax reduction services. All the benefits of extortion, without the stress of remediation.” https://twitter.com/...