Jack Dorsey says Trump ban was the right decision for Twitter but reflects a “failure” to promote healthy conversation and sets a dangerous precedent
Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey explained in a tweetstorm that the company faced an ‘extraordinary and untenable circumstance’
Washington Post Elizabeth Dwoskin
Context & Ripple Effects
Dorsey had long described Trump’s use of Twitter as a complicated spotlight on the service, while reports later showed he had personally intervened in other contentious account decisions. The ban therefore marks a break from Twitter’s prior willingness to keep prominent, polarizing figures on the platform.
The related coverage portrays the decision as one made under exceptional pressure: Dorsey’s lieutenants reportedly overcame his reluctance after concluding Trump was using the account to incite violence. His public warning about precedent puts Twitter’s own decision-making authority at the center of the story.
First-order effects
- Trump loses access to Twitter’s distribution, while Dorsey publicly accepts responsibility for an enforcement decision he calls necessary despite its costs.
- Twitter’s leadership must defend a ban that overcame Dorsey’s reported reluctance, making its standards for exceptional accounts more consequential.
Second-order effects
- Twitter’s content-policy staff gain a clearer example that even the platform’s most visible political account can face removal when leadership judges the circumstances untenable.
- Other large platforms face sharper scrutiny of whether their own high-stakes moderation calls rest on defined rules or on the kind of CEO discretion described in the related coverage.
Third-order effects
- If emergency bans become the mechanism for addressing political incitement, platform governance will be judged increasingly by the consistency and legitimacy of private executives’ enforcement power rather than by ordinary account rules.
- Dorsey’s precedent warning points to a durable conflict: platforms may be expected to curb harmful speech while being criticized for concentrating public-discourse decisions inside corporate leadership.
The trend: Major social platforms are moving from tolerating high-profile political speech to making increasingly consequential, executive-led decisions about when account enforcement overrides reach and prominence.
Related: Twitter · Jack Dorsey · Dorsey’s earlier concerns over Trump’s Twitter use · How Dorsey’s lieutenants pushed for the Trump ban · Dorsey’s role in Twitter content decisions
Related Coverage
- Twitter boss: Trump ban is ‘right’ but ‘dangerous’ BBC · James Clayton
- View article Business Insider
- View article Bloomberg
- ‘Dangerous’: Twitter CEO defends Trump ban, warns about precedent Al Jazeera
- Jack Dorsey breaks his silence after Trump ban Engadget · Karissa Bell
- Twitter chief says Trump ban was right decision but sets ‘dangerous precedent’ The Guardian · Kari Paul
- Twitter CEO Tweets About Banning Trump From Site NPR · Jaclyn Diaz
- I do not celebrate or feel pride; Twitter CEO defends permanent ban on Trump International Business Times
- Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey Expresses Passion for Bitcoin in Thread Justifying Twitter Ban of President Trump blockchain.news · Lucas Cacioli
- Twitter's Jack Dorsey defends controversial decision to ban Donald Trump Android Central · Michael Allison
- Twitter Is Helping To Build An Alternative To Twitter, Says CEO Jack Dorsey Deadline · Bruce Haring
- Twitter's Dorsey Says Banning Trump Was ‘Right Decision’ Bloomberg · Kurt Wagner
- ‘Was This Correct?’ Twitter's Dorsey Asks About Banning Trump and Then Says ‘Yes’ CoinDesk · Kevin Reynolds
- Twitter CEO Dorsey Praises Bitcoin While Defending Trump Ban Decrypt · Jeff Benson
- Jack Dorsey defends Twitter's Trump ban, then enthuses about bitcoin The Verge · Elizabeth Lopatto
- Trump ban: No ‘moment for celebration’ in the eyes of Twitter chief ZDNet · Charlie Osborne
- Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey Speaks Out After Trump Ban Android Headlines · David Challis
- Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey: Trump ban was right but sets a ‘dangerous’ precedent CNN · Charles Riley
- Twitter CEO on Banning Trump: Online Speech Can Cause Harm Offline Gizmodo · Matt Novak
- Twitter CEO: Trump Ban Represents a ‘Failure’ Newser · Evann Gastaldo
- Twitter's CEO defends decision to ban Trump but warns about big tech's power WRAL TechWire · David Hamilton
- Snapchat permanently bans Trump Politico · Matthew Choi
- Snapchat permanently bans President Trump's account TechCrunch · Lucas Matney
- Report: Snapchat to Ban Trump on Jan. 20 PCMag · Stephanie Mlot
- Snapchat will permanently ban Trump when he leaves office on January 20 Business Insider · Kevin Shalvey
- Snapchat permanently bans Donald Trump from the platform The Economic Times
- Trump Banned From Snapchat for Trying to Incite Violence Bloomberg · Sarah Frier
- Snapchat permanently suspends Trump, saying it is ‘in the interest of public safety’ after Capitol riots USA Today · Kelly Tyko
- Snapchat Permanently Bans Trump for Spreading Misinformation, Hate Speech, Inciting Violence The Wrap · J. Clara Chan
- Snapchat Will Terminate Donald Trump's Account, Citing ‘Public Safety’ Variety · Todd Spangler
- Snapchat Will Permanently Ban Trump Forbes · Rachel Sandler
- Snapchat is permanently banning Trump's account CNET · Queenie Wong
- Snap says it is permanently terminating Trump's account Reuters · Elizabeth Culliford
- Snapchat will terminate Trump's account on Jan. 20 CNBC · Salvador Rodriguez
- Snapchat will permanently terminate Trump's account The Verge · Jay Peters
- Snapchat permanently suspends Donald Trump's account citing public safety concern Pocketnow · Nadeem Sarwar
Discussion
-
@jack
@jack
on x
I do not celebrate or feel pride in our having to ban @realDonaldTrump from Twitter, or how we got here. After a clear warning we'd take this action, we made a decision with the best information we had based on threats to physical safety both on and off Twitter. Was this correct?
-
@jack
@jack
on x
The reason I have so much passion for #Bitcoin is largely because of the model it demonstrates: a foundational internet technology that is not controlled or influenced by any single individual or entity. This is what the internet wants to be, and over time, more of it will be.
-
@jack
@jack
on x
I believe this was the right decision for Twitter. We faced an extraordinary and untenable circumstance, forcing us to focus all of our actions on public safety. Offline harm as a result of online speech is demonstrably real, and what drives our policy and enforcement above all.
-
@jack
@jack
on x
That said, having to ban an account has real and significant ramifications. While there are clear and obvious exceptions, I feel a ban is a failure of ours ultimately to promote healthy conversation. And a time for us to reflect on our operations and the environment around us.
-
@jack
@jack
on x
Having to take these actions fragment the public conversation. They divide us. They limit the potential for clarification, redemption, and learning. And sets a precedent I feel is dangerous: the power an individual or corporation has over a part of the global public conversation.
-
@jack
@jack
on x
The check and accountability on this power has always been the fact that a service like Twitter is one small part of the larger public conversation happening across the internet. If folks do not agree with our rules and enforcement, they can simply go to another internet service.
-
@sonnybunch
Sonny Bunch
on x
This is a good and thoughtful thread. For me, there's a basic problem at the heart of social media that's essentially unsolvable: you're essentially creating a society and all societies have people who are unfit for society. It's why we have prisons. https://twitter.com/...
-
@minhazmerchant
Minhaz Merchant
on x
Mea culpa from @jack: “ I feel a ban is a failure of ours to ultimately promote healthy conversation.” Trump is nasty but so are others who aren't banned. Selective banning violates the principle of free speech with reasonable caveats that @Twitter should uphold but doesn't👇 http…
-
@coinyeezy
Elon Moist
on x
Bitcoin can be the foundational layer of the next internet, like TCP/IP. A settlement layer not just for money, but for apps & smart contracts as well. https://twitter.com/...
-
@markdice
Mark Dice
on x
Not only did you ban the President of the United States, but you deleted historical records (i.e. his tweets.) And you're been hiding behind your Twitter account, not doing interviews ever since you got WRECKED on Joe Rogan's podcast. https://twitter.com/...
-
@donie
Donie O'Sullivan
on x
Something about Jack, despite being aloof and often posting the most bizarre shit... he is so much more effective at conveying a sense of sincerity and thoughtfulness about online speech than Zuckerberg. https://twitter.com/...
-
@columbiabugle
@columbiabugle
on x
No, it was not correct. It is much better for the health of our country for everyone to be on the same platform discussing and debating the issues of the day. Twitter should at the very least base their terms of service on the First Amendment Common Law of the United States. http…
-
@davidakaye
David Kaye
on x
fascinating thread by @jack, lots to unpack. i get that he has to speak for the company but i suspect this was a broader policy call. greater transparency into how that call was made, the standards applied, etc would be really welcomed. https://twitter.com/...
-
@borisep
Boris Epshteyn
on x
So.... are you actually going to do the right thing and reinstate @realdonaldtrump or just waste space with drivel? https://twitter.com/...
-
@bretweinstein
Bret Weinstein
on x
This needs to be taken in context, @jack. Twitter also banned @ArticlesOfUnity, and the explanation you personally offered turned out to be false—yet the account wasn't reinstated. This isn't uncommon. You can't tell us you had no choice when you behave this way even when you do.…
-
@bborrman
Brandon
on x
The last week of content enforcement decisions is bigger than one account or company. More... https://twitter.com/...
-
@alexberenson
Alex Berenson
on x
Fact check: the Internet has gone exactly the opposite way for 25 years https://twitter.com/...
-
@indigenousai
@indigenousai
on x
your online platform almost toppled the US govmt and youre like sort of sorry (???) but also cant resist promoting crypto pyramid schemes. absolutely incredible, literally no shame whatsoever https://twitter.com/...
-
@ibogost
Ian Bogost
on x
All of the internet was like this before companies such as Twitter privatized it all. https://twitter.com/...
-
@lizzadwoskin
@lizzadwoskin
on x
Ever reflective, @jack calls his decision to ban Trump a failure to create a service that can sustain healthy conversation. His tone strikes me as the opposite of Sheryl Sandberg's, who took the same opportunity to say FB did better than others https://www.washingtonpost.com/ ...
-
@normeisen
Norm Eisen
on x
Important, even historic, thread https://twitter.com/...
-
@xeni
Xeni Jardin
on x
I am re-reading @jack's thread here and trying to imagine what it's like to be Jack Dorsey right now. The one guy held primarily responsible for these decisions while faced with the business end of Donald J. Trump's many armed and angry supporters. https://twitter.com/...
-
@epro
Emil Protalinski
on x
Snapchat could have easily been the social network to permanently ban Trump first, and long before January 6, 2021. Instead, Snapchat is just following Twitter and even then only waiting until Trump is no longer president. https://twitter.com/...
-
@natsecgeek
@natsecgeek
on x
Waiting until the 20th is so brave. https://twitter.com/...
-
@katiephang
Katie Phang
on x
Trump is left 😶 https://twitter.com/...