/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

COVID-19 has accelerated the adoption of tech and ecommerce that will impact the lives of people who aren't online, especially in the developing world

At the beginning of this year (which now feels like 100 years ago), I gave a presentation on macro trends in tech, at an event in Davos.

Benedict Evans

Context & Ripple Effects

Two months before this piece, Benedict Evans had framed the 2020s around a world where tech has already connected most of the globe — connectivity was largely done, and the open question was what happens to the people and economies on the far side of it. This essay is his first pandemic-era answer: lockdowns didn't just move existing users online faster, they pushed commerce and services toward populations who were never online to begin with.

First-order effects

  • Ecommerce and remote-work tools absorb demand they would have taken years to win, compressing adoption cycles into months — a pattern the year-end coverage confirmed when it noted trends like virtual commerce unfolding at pandemic speed (years compressed into months).
  • People who aren't online, especially in the developing world, now face services migrating to channels they can't reach, making offline status a concrete economic disadvantage rather than a lagging indicator.

Second-order effects

  • The same acceleration splits workforces: relationships in the corpus show COVID deepening the divide between remote-capable and non-remote workers, so the offline population and the non-remote workforce overlap into a widening access gap.
  • Firms racing to serve newly digitized demand turn to automation, chatbots, and AI in call centers — substituting software for the human channels that previously reached less-connected customers.

Third-order effects

  • If the compression holds, the developing-world offline population becomes the next adoption frontier: once behaviors like virtual commerce are normalized everywhere else (fringe behaviors going mainstream), the marginal growth market is the billions still outside the network.
  • Structurally, the pandemic-era jump means digital infrastructure stops being an optional layer and becomes the default interface for commerce and work — raising the cost of exclusion for anyone the acceleration leaves behind.

The trend: COVID-19 turned gradual global digitization into a step change, shifting the industry's growth question from connecting the world to serving the people the connection hasn't yet reached.

Discussion

  • @fgraillot Florian Graillot on x
    How the current lockdown is boosting tech adoption, and its impact on the way we are working (replicating existing processes online vs. building new ones). #startup #growth #InsurTech https://www.ben-evans.com/...
  • @valaafshar Vala Afshar on x
    “In ‘normal’, steady state growth, the default choices and the incumbent companies soak up most of the new use... But when the incumbents are swamped and everyone is frantically trying everything, it may be easier for new voices to be heard. Again - the market is being reset.” ht…
  • @manoushz Manoush Zomorodi on x
    “we're going through a vast, forced public experiment to find out which bits of human psychology will align with which kinds of [tech] tool” - ⁦⁦@benedictevans⁩ https://www.ben-evans.com/...
  • @samuelgil Samuel Gil on x
    “Every time we get a new kind of tool, we start by making the new thing fit the existing ways that we work, but then, over time, we change the work to fit the new tool.” https://www.ben-evans.com/...
  • @drjackuk Dr Jack Kreindler on x
    Food for thought. Worth a read: “...we're going through a vast, forced public experiment to find out which bits of human psychology will align with which kinds of tool, just as we did with SMS, email or indeed phone calls in previous generations.” https://twitter.com/...