/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Source: Apple is not happy with the QTM 525 mm-wave antenna module Qualcomm is offering for this year's 5G iPhones and is trying to design its own antenna

In a year where the 5G radio will be the new iPhone's spotlight feature, Apple has decided to design the phone's antenna itself.

Fast Company Mark Sullivan

Context & Ripple Effects

The antenna dispute is one thread in a longer unraveling of the Apple–Qualcomm relationship. In 2019, Apple settled with Qualcomm only because it feared Intel could not supply 5G modems alone — dependence it accepted reluctantly. Qualcomm had set the technical template two years earlier when it unveiled its first mmWave and sub-6GHz antenna modules, making the QTM 525 the default path to millimeter-wave 5G.

Apple's response now is to take the antenna in-house rather than accept Qualcomm's module, and the related coverage shows where that leads: TSMC is lined up to mass-produce 4nm 5G modem chips and Apple has since spent billions building its own modem. The antenna is the visible edge of a broader effort to replace Qualcomm silicon across the radio chain.

First-order effects

  • Apple gains control of the antenna design for the 2020 5G iPhones, whose mmWave radio is the headline feature — but inherits the engineering risk that Qualcomm's validated QTM 525 module was designed to absorb.

Second-order effects

  • Qualcomm loses component-level content on its largest smartphone customer even while remaining its modem supplier, weakening the attach economics of its antenna-plus-modem bundle.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds — antenna first, then an in-house modem built on TSMC process nodes — Apple internalizes the entire iPhone radio stack, leaving Qualcomm dependent on Android OEMs for the revenue the iPhone once guaranteed.

The trend: Apple is systematically internalizing the iPhone's radio hardware, moving from Qualcomm's integrated antenna-and-modem modules toward its own TSMC-built components.

Discussion

  • @nicolasmagand Nicolas Magand on x
    “Apple isn't great at designing antennas. [...] Most famously, its antenna design in the iPhone 4 was blamed for dropped calls when you held the phone in a certain way” So, since it was literally 10 years ago, maybe it should say “Apple wasn't great at designing antennas”, right?…
  • @mytechmusings @mytechmusings on x
    Interesting news. RF is hard. I doubt @Apple will be able to do thier own in such a short time.. As I have written, if they want to do their modem they need strong RF expertise... https://www.eetimes.com/... https://www.rcrwireless.com/ ... @Qualcomm @QorvoInc @skyworksinc https:…
  • @harrymccracken Harry McCracken on x
    Scoop from @thesullivan: Apple is designing its own antenna for this year's iPhone, which is never easy and especially tricky for 5G. https://www.fastcompany.com/ ...