/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Facebook updated fact-checking guidelines in August to include ads, but some fact checkers say they learned about the change only from Zuckerberg's testimony

Alex Hern / The Guardian : Tweets: @carnage4life and @alexhern See also Mediagazer Tweets: Dare Obasanjo / @carnage4life : This is an interesting point about 3rd party fact checking of political ads on Facebook. People basically arguing orgs Facebook hired like Politifact should be able to ban Trump or Elizabeth Warren ads and it isn't clear they want to be in that business. https://www.theguardian.com/ ... @alexhern : “Several of us really don't want that power,” one fact checker said. “One of my first questions is, why are you now giving us powers to remove content when you haven't before? That's just a Pandora's box in my opinion.” https://www.theguardian.com/ ... See also Mediagazer

The Guardian Alex Hern

Discussion

  • @carnage4life Dare Obasanjo on x
    This is an interesting point about 3rd party fact checking of political ads on Facebook. People basically arguing orgs Facebook hired like Politifact should be able to ban Trump or Elizabeth Warren ads and it isn't clear they want to be in that business. https://www.theguardian.c…
  • @alexhern @alexhern on x
    “Several of us really don't want that power,” one fact checker said. “One of my first questions is, why are you now giving us powers to remove content when you haven't before? That's just a Pandora's box in my opinion.” https://www.theguardian.com/ ...