/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Sources: Pinterest revenues were up 58% in 2017 to $473M; company now has almost 250M monthly active users

Sarah Frier / Bloomberg : Tweets: @shiraovide and @rrhoover Tweets: Shira Ovide / @shiraovide : For comparison, Snap had $405 million in revenue the year before its IPO. http://twitter.com/... Ryan Hoover / @rrhoover : New Pinterest numbers: $473M in sales last year 250M MAU $12.3B valuation at last fundraise http://www.bloomberg.com/... by @sarahfrier

Bloomberg Sarah Frier

Context & Ripple Effects

This Bloomberg report landed in May 2018, when Pinterest was still private and its financials were guesswork: Sarah Frier's sourcing put 2017 revenue at $473M, up 58%, with almost 250M monthly active users, while Ryan Hoover flagged the $12.3B valuation from the last fundraise. Shira Ovide's comparison point — Snap at $405M in the year before its IPO — framed Pinterest as already at or beyond Snap's pre-IPO revenue scale.

The months around the leak exposed the central tension: by September, [[a:933246|reporting described investor and employee frustration with Pinterest's deliberately steady pace]] even as the company grew users 27% and revenue 50%. It went public within a year, and the quarterly record since — a 62% YoY Q2 2019 beat with 300M MAUs, then FY 2021 revenue up 52% even as MAUs fell 6%, and $1.15B in Q4 2024 on 553M users — shows exactly what that 2017 baseline compounded into.

First-order effects

  • Late-stage investors and ad buyers got their first hard read on Pinterest's economics: $473M against Snap's $405M pre-IPO year made Pinterest's scale directly comparable, attaching a concrete revenue multiple to the $12.3B last-private valuation.
  • The leak forced Pinterest's hand on disclosure — within months it was confirming 250M MAUs and 50% growth publicly, ending the era of opaque private metrics.

Second-order effects

  • Once the numbers were out, the gap between Pinterest's patient monetization and its backers' expectations widened: the reported investor frustration pushed the company toward proving an IPO-ready growth story rather than extending its private runway.
  • Snap and other visual-advertising rivals gained a benchmark competitor growing revenue faster than its user base — evidence that Pinterest was closing the monetization-per-user gap without having paid the public-market scrutiny bill yet.

Third-order effects

The trend: Pinterest's arc from leaked private financials to a decelerating but far larger public ad platform is one data point in the maturation of the 2010s social-media cohort, where user growth peaks years before monetization does.