/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

SoftBank, Facebook, Amazon, and others partner to lay 60Tbps Jupiter undersea cable, to open in 2020, from Los Angeles to Japan and the Philippines

NTT Com to Construct Optical Submarine Cable ConnectingRobert Hackett / Fortune : SoftBank Teams With Facebook and Amazon on Undersea Internet Cable

VentureBeat Paul Sawers

Context & Ripple Effects

Jupiter repeats a route Google's consortium already lit: the 60Tbps FASTER cable began service between the US West Coast and Japan just last year, so SoftBank is buying into proven demand on the busiest Pacific lane. What changed is who pays — a social network and a retailer are now named partners alongside a carrier, following Facebook's 160Tbps Marea crossing of the Atlantic completed weeks earlier and its LA-to-Hong Kong PLCN project announced a year ago.

NTT Com holds the construction contract, keeping a traditional telecom operator at the center of a project whose funders increasingly consume bandwidth rather than sell it.

First-order effects

  • SoftBank gains dedicated 60Tbps trans-Pacific capacity for its own network when Jupiter opens in 2020, while Facebook and Amazon lock in private bandwidth instead of leasing transit from carriers.
  • NTT Com converts the consortium's capex into a flagship construction win on the US–Japan–Philippines route.

Second-order effects

  • Carriers that sell trans-Pacific transit face shrinking wholesale demand as Google, Microsoft, Facebook, and now Amazon each self-provision their own crossings, pressuring the price of leased capacity.
  • Rival hyperscalers must match the move route by route — Google and Microsoft have already answered in the Pacific and Atlantic respectively, making per-route capacity an arms race among content companies.

Third-order effects

  • If every major cloud and content company ends up owning its submarine routes, the industry structure inverts: telcos become builders-for-hire like NTT Com while bandwidth ownership concentrates in a handful of American platforms.
  • Consortium membership becomes a bargaining chip over landing rights and routing — the Philippines leg here anticipates the Southeast Asian expansion Google and Facebook pursued four years later.

The trend: Trans-Pacific subsea capacity is shifting from carrier-led consortia to hyperscaler-funded private infrastructure, with each new cable doubling down on the US–Asia corridor.