/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Google, Facebook, Pacific Light Cable Network partner to lay undersea cable between LA and Hong Kong which will transfer data at 120 terabits/sec, open in 2018

Jordan Novet / VentureBeat :

VentureBeat Jordan Novet

Context & Ripple Effects

This is Google's second move into owning trans-Pacific capacity in six months: it had already backed the 60 Tbps FASTER cable between the US West Coast and Japan, which entered service in June 2016. The difference here is the partner set — Facebook joins as co-investor alongside Pacific Light Cable Network, making this one of the first cables where two consumer-internet giants, not telecom carriers, anchor the financing.

The pattern holds across the corpus: by 2017 SoftBank, Facebook, and Amazon were lining up the Jupiter cable to Japan and the Philippines, and by 2021 Google and Facebook were jointly funding an Asia-wide system while Facebook and Amazon petitioned the FCC directly for a Philippines–California landing. The LA–Hong Kong project is the early data point where hyperscalers stopped renting bandwidth and started commissioning their own.

First-order effects

  • Google and Facebook secure dedicated 120 Tbps capacity between Los Angeles and Hong Kong, insulating their traffic from carrier pricing and congestion on the busiest Asia-US route.
  • Telecom operators that sell transit on the trans-Pacific corridor now compete against the very customers who once bought that transit.

Second-order effects

  • Rival cloud platforms respond in kind rather than lease: Amazon follows onto Jupiter and then files with the FCC for its own cable with Facebook, while Google extends the model to France via the Dunant build with SubCom.
  • Cable builders such as SubCom shift their customer base from carrier consortia toward hyperscalers, changing who sets route and capacity decisions.

Third-order effects

  • If the sequence from FASTER through Dunant continues, the physical backbone of the internet consolidates into the hands of a handful of content and cloud companies — turning landing rights, spectrum, and seabed routes into competitive chokepoints they control end to end.
  • Regulators such as the FCC become gatekeepers not just for carriers but for platform companies' global infrastructure ambitions, as the Facebook–Amazon filing already shows.

The trend: Subsea infrastructure is migrating from telecom-carrier consortia to hyperscaler-owned builds, with each successive cable raising both capacity and the owners' control over global data routes.