eMarketer cuts growth forecasts for US smartwatch market in 2016 from 60% to 25% YoY, citing lack of clear use case
and now I want an Apple Watch Ashley King / Phandroid : Here's the list of wearables that will receive Android Wear 2.0 Brad Linder / Liliputing : Report: Smartwatches and other wearables fail to meet sales expectations Lory Gil / iMore : Save your Apple Watch's battery while playing Pokémon Go with these tips! Christopher Baugh / iPhone in Canada Blog : Apple May Incorporate Haptic Motor Into Bands For Next Apple Watch [REPORT] Brandon Russell / TechnoBuffalo : Google confirms it will launch two smartwatches early next year Alex Wagner / PhoneDog.com : Google confirms that it'll launch two Android Wear 2.0 smartwatches in Q1 2017 Florence Ion / Android Central : Google's two ‘Nexus’ smartwatches will debut early next year PYMNTS.com : Wearables Underperforming More Than Expected Zac Hall / 9to5Mac : Pokémon Go lands on the Apple Watch after Activity and Workout integration David Bolton / ARC : 2016 Was The Year People Proved They Don't Care About Smartwatches Jon Fingas / Engadget : Fitbit's Charge 2 helps keep your heart in the zone
Context & Ripple Effects
The smartwatch story of 2016 has been a boom-to-reckoning arc: shipments grew 223% year-over-year in Q1 with Apple holding 52% share, but by September IDC had Apple Watch shipments down 58% while basic fitness bands rose 48%. Pebble's layoff of a quarter of its staff in March already signaled that independent vendors were feeling the squeeze.
eMarketer's cut — from 60% to 25% US growth for 2016, explicitly blamed on the lack of a clear use case — turns those shipment wobbles into an official demand-side verdict just as Google prepares two Android Wear 2.0 watches for Q1 2017 and Apple reportedly works on haptic-motor watch bands.
First-order effects
- Vendors entering 2017 on the old forecast — most immediately Google with its two confirmed Android Wear 2.0 launches — now face a US market growing at less than half the expected rate.
- Apple's Watch line loses its 'fastest-growing category' framing, pushing differentiation toward hardware features like the reported haptic-motor band rather than category momentum.
Second-order effects
- Basic fitness bands, which IDC showed rising 48% while smart wearables fell 27.2%, become the safe harbor — favoring Fitbit's cheaper lineup over full-smartwatch bets.
- Platform holders respond with software rather than price: Android Wear 2.0's rollout list and Apple's band-level hardware experiments are both attempts to manufacture the missing use case.
Third-order effects
- If the pattern holds, the market bifurcates into commodity bands and a platform-smartwatch tier where vendors without scale or a distinct use case — Pebble being the cautionary case — get consolidated out.
- Analyst forecasts themselves become a forcing function: a halved growth number pressures fundraising-dependent independents first, since Pebble already cited a tough climate on far less bad news.
The trend: Wearables are splitting into a low-cost band commodity market and a platform-owned smartwatch tier, with the 'clear use case' question deciding which vendors survive.