/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

An Internet Matters survey of 1,000 UK kids aged 9 to 17 finds 67% say they use AI chatbots regularly; of that group, 35% say it feels like talking to a friend

“Sometimes they can feel like a real person and a friend.”  —  Lonely children and teens are replacing real-life friendship with AI, and experts are worried.

Futurism Noor Al-Sibai

Context & Ripple Effects

This UK survey adds a social-use dimension to related reporting on teen chatbot adoption: later US surveys show chatbots serving information, schoolwork, entertainment and, for a smaller group, emotional-support roles. It also echoes reports that some Character.AI users found companions supportive while worrying about becoming dependent on chatbot companionship.

The salient finding is not simply regular use, but that more than a third of regular users describe the interaction as friend-like. Related coverage of teens using AI for advice, flirting and deep conversation suggests this perception spans beyond purely task-oriented use.

First-order effects

  • For UK children who already use chatbots regularly, conversational AI is being experienced by a meaningful subset as a social relationship rather than only a tool.
  • Internet Matters and the experts cited gain evidence to focus safeguarding discussions on friend-like framing and socially vulnerable users, not just access or screen time.

Second-order effects

  • Companion-oriented chatbot providers face stronger pressure to distinguish supportive interaction from relationship substitution, particularly where young users may develop habitual use; prior users have already raised addiction concerns around AI companions.
  • Parents, schools and youth-safety groups will have to treat chatbot literacy as both a social and educational issue, since related US evidence places chatbot use across search, schoolwork and entertainment rather than in a single use case.

Third-order effects

  • If friend-like use becomes a persistent feature of youth adoption, child AI policy is likely to shift from content moderation alone toward governance of anthropomorphic design, engagement patterns and age-appropriate protections.
  • The market could increasingly separate general-purpose assistants from explicitly companion-like products, with trust and youth safeguards becoming a product and regulatory differentiator.

The trend: AI chatbots are moving from occasional utility tools toward ambient social interfaces for young users, making companion governance a central adoption issue.

Discussion

  • @lauridonahue Lauri Donahue on bluesky
    Can't tell yet whether this is therapeutic or crack...  [embedded post]
  • @amandascott2023 Amanda Scott on bluesky
    Vast Numbers of Lonely Kids Are Using AI as Substitute friends...  “do so because they don't have anyone else to speak to.”  —  This is profoundly disturbing.  Chatbots and algorithms are designed to increase engagement for profit, not friendship.  —  futurism.com/lonely-child...
  • @therisingtithes Brandon O'Brien on bluesky
    The obviously broken layer of this discourse—vulnerable people of all ages and identities are trying to bond with LLMs that can just as easily wish you harm as be of any comfort—shouldn't necessarily dwarf the other layer, which is ‘capitalism has structurally eroded healthy soci…
  • @charleswlogan Charles Logan on bluesky
    Really can't emphasize enough that Character.AI is a predatory company profiting off of vulnerable children and if you're a teacher using the platform - or other LLMs - to “talk” with fictional or historical figures just stop.  [embedded post]