Trump says “We might have to put DOGE on Elon”, “DOGE is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon”, and “We'll have to take a look” at deporting Musk
President Trump said Tuesday that DOGE could investigate Elon Musk, the latest indicator …
AxiosAvery Lotz
Context & Ripple Effects
DOGE was introduced as an outside-government advisory effort led by Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, with a mandate to identify government cuts and deregulation opportunities. That original outside-government guidance role makes Trump’s invocation of DOGE against Musk a notable reversal in the relationship’s public framing.
The remarks follow reports that Musk would step back from the administration and his own subsequent discussion of leaving government work, rather than evidence of a newly announced enforcement action. They sharpen an already visible separation between Trump and one of DOGE’s most prominent backers.
First-order effects
Trump’s comments make Musk a publicly named potential subject of administration scrutiny, while stopping short of announcing a DOGE investigation or deportation proceeding.
The rhetoric further weakens the political alignment that had underpinned Musk’s DOGE role; the earlier expected step-back from the administration now reads less like a routine transition.
Second-order effects
Musk-linked businesses and counterparts dealing with the federal government face greater political-risk uncertainty, because the president has publicly raised the prospect of scrutiny without defining its scope or basis.
DOGE’s credibility as a cost-cutting and deregulation vehicle may be tested if it is increasingly presented as a tool in disputes with former allies rather than as a broadly applied reform effort.
Third-order effects
If this pattern continues, informal government-efficiency initiatives may become more tightly associated with presidential political leverage, complicating their claims to neutral, system-wide reform.
The episode could reinforce a wider separation between technology leaders’ political access and durable policy influence: high-profile alignment can create visibility, but it may not protect partners once priorities diverge.
The trend: This is one data point in the shift from tech-policy alliances built around reform agendas toward more personalized and contingent relationships with political power.
President Trump on Elon Musk: “DOGE is going to look at Musk. If DOGE looks at Musk, we're going to save a fortune...I don't think he should be playing that game with me.” [video]
Removal of funding for enforcement of federal contempt of court orders is the actual crux of this spending bill. This is nominally aimed at removal of illegal immigrants, but obviously also enables many other abuses of power by the President. Should this be allowed?
Probably President Trump's strongest remarks yet on his former close ally @elonmusk “without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa”.
REPORTER: What happened to Elon Musk? TRUMP: Who? R: What happened to Elon Musk? TRUMP: Nothing. He's upset he's losing his EV mandate. But he could lose a lot more than that, I can tell you right now. Elon can lose a lot more than that. [video]
🚨 🇺🇸 MIND-BLOWING FEDERAL BUDGET BREAKDOWN: $6.16 TRILLION SPENDING VS $4.47 TRILLION REVENUE The government's fiscal 2023 numbers reveal massive deficit spending that would make any sane business owner cringe. Social Security dominates spending while individual income taxes [ima…
Another big statement against the Senate bill. The trade union representing 860,000 electrical workers says the bill will cost “hundreds of thousands of good-paying construction jobs.” I hadn't seen this statement reported anywhere else. [image]
BREAKING: Odds of Elon Musk creating a new political party in 2025 surge to 41% The spike comes after Elon proposed forming the “America Party.” Is it time for another choice in America? [image]