/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

The US OCC says banks can engage in some crypto activities, rescinding prior guidance that told them they should clear such activities with regulators first

The U.S. regulator overseeing national banks clarified Friday that banks can engage in some crypto activities …

Reuters Pete Schroeder

Context & Ripple Effects

The OCC had already mapped out limited bank roles in digital-asset infrastructure, including services for fiat-backed stablecoin issuers and node operation and stablecoin payment activity. This move changes the procedural posture around those activities: from prior regulatory clearance toward banks making their own permissible-activity and risk judgments.

It is an early step in a broader unwinding of bank-crypto preapproval barriers. Later coverage shows the FDIC adopted a similar risk-management framing and the Federal Reserve also withdrew its prior approval-oriented guidance.

First-order effects

  • National banks no longer have to obtain the prior clearance described in the rescinded OCC guidance before undertaking the covered crypto activities.
  • The OCC shifts the immediate burden onto banks to determine whether an activity is legally permissible and can be conducted safely, rather than using the prior clearance process as the initial gate.

Second-order effects

  • The change reduces an important source of regulatory friction for banks weighing crypto products and infrastructure, while making internal compliance and risk controls the central practical constraint.
  • It also sets a clearer path toward the aligned posture later taken by the FDIC and Federal Reserve, including the Fed's withdrawal of its crypto preapproval guidance, reducing the chance that a bank faces conflicting entry processes across federal supervisors.

Third-order effects

  • If supervisors sustain this approach, bank participation in crypto is more likely to be governed as a conventional safety-and-soundness question than as an activity requiring exceptional pre-clearance.
  • That would narrow the regulatory path toward bank-provided customer crypto services, although the scope remains bounded by which activities regulators consider legally permissible and safely managed.

The trend: U.S. bank-crypto policy is moving from precautionary preapproval toward supervised, risk-managed participation in selected activities.

Discussion

  • MLex MLex on x
    OCC reaffirms permissibility of certain crypto activities in federal banking system
  • @davidgerard.co.uk @davidgerard.co.uk on bluesky
    OCC: lol who cares CRIME IS LEGAL let's have FIFTY MORE SILVERGATES www.reuters.com/business/fin...
  • @nic__carter Nic Carter on x
    biggest news of the day https://www.occ.gov/...
  • @anchorage @anchorage on x
    1/ Big news from the @USOCC: Just released today, Interpretive Letter 1183 reaffirms that national banks can engage in crypto custody, stablecoin activities, and more—without needing case-by-case approval. The OCC also pulled back from prior guidance that contributed to
  • @stevenkelly49 Steven Kelly on x
    Let it begin: the OCC rescinds “IL-1179,” which called on its supervised banks to receive supervisory nonobjection before engaging in crypto activities. Next up? — rescission of the equivalent letters from the FDIC (FIL-16-2022) and the Fed (SR 22-6).
  • @jerallaire Jeremy Allaire on x
    Let's go! Banks using USDC. Coming soon to a blockchain near you. We are excited about wiring up the existing financial system to the new internet financial system. Circle Mint is open for business.
  • @kevwysocki Kevin Wysocki on x
    It is great to see the @USOCC issued new guidance that makes it easier for national banks to participate in the digital asset ecosystem while also pulling out of a joint statement by prudential regulators that led to mass debanking of crypto firms. This is a great sign that it
  • @tyler_did_it @tyler_did_it on x
    And now we have the biggest news of the day 📢 The OCC has clarified the activities banks can engage in with crypto. Stating that crypto custody and stablecoins are now allowed amongst other activities And rescinding the prior rules that enabled Operation Chokepoint. The [image]
  • @caitlinlong_ Caitlin Long on x
    AMID ALL THE JUBILATION ABOUT the OCC news, #OperationChokePoint2.0 isn't over until: 1. Fed & FDIC also rescind their anti-#crypto guidance, which is still in effect (Fed & FDIC were far more detrimental to crypto banking than OCC) & 2. @custodiabank has its Fed master account.
  • @kmsmithdc Kristin Smith on x
    6/ Importantly, the administration is moving quickly to end the Biden-era debanking policies. Today, the OCC issued an interpretive letter confirming that “crypto-asset custody, certain stablecoin activities, and participation in independent node verification networks such as
  • @realmaxavery Max Avery on x
    The OCC confirmed banks can handle crypto custody, stablecoins, and run nodes WITHOUT needing special approval first. This cuts red tape and is especially bullish for utility driven digital assets. 1/19🧵 [image]
  • @kross_roads @kross_roads on x
    $SOFI The OCC rescinded a portion of what prevents SoFi from relaunching their crypto platform. So can SoFi launch tomorrow? Not really, no, but this is still a big deal. It's a “rev your engines” moment, NOT a green light. Why do they need to wait? 1) There are other [image]
  • @iampaulgrewal @iampaulgrewal on x
    The hits keep coming. Here are three words I didn't imagine saying just a few short months ago: thank you OCC. https://www.occ.gov/...
  • @datadinvesting @datadinvesting on x
    The OCC has cleared banks to engage in crypto-asset custody. That was a huge hurdle for $SOFI to start offering it again as a part of the platform. The post below details how much I think that would contribute to SoFi's revenue 👇
  • @sgjohnsson Scott Johnsson on x
    Stables bounced right back to near ATH w/ a $2B + week (~90th percentile flow). Land grab season approaching. With OCC news and stablecoin legislation by August (might be too conservative given apparent priority), won't be long before that's $2B/day.
  • @autismcapital @autismcapital on x
    🚨NEW: The OCC confirms that BANKS can now ALLOW crypto asset custody, stablecoins, and run their own nodes. Times are changing! Soon Mom and Dad will be able to look at their Bank of America account and see their Crypto holdings too! [image]
  • @usocc @usocc on x
    The OCC reaffirmed that crypto-asset custody, holding deposits that serve as reserves backing stablecoins, & the use of distributed ledger technology & stablecoins to facilitate permissible payments activities are permissible in the federal banking system. https://www.occ.gov/...…