/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Survey of 700+ startup founders: 31% don't intend to IPO, 67% now say VCs have more negotiating power

First Round Capital just published its second-ever State of Startups report, and it's chock full of interesting sentiments from a survey of more than 700 founders …

TechCrunch Connie Loizos

Context & Ripple Effects

First Round Capital's second State of Startups survey lands at the tail of a year when investors themselves braced for a correction: an earlier [[a:864504|Upfront survey found 91% of VCs expecting valuations to fall in the first half of 2016, with 62% saying their portfolios were already cutting costs]]. The founder-side data now quantifies what that repricing felt like on the other side of the table.

The headline findings — 67% of 700+ founders conceding VCs hold more negotiating power, and 31% who simply do not intend to IPO — line up with a November study of 79 public tech S1 filings showing median founder ownership at exit was just 11%, versus 62% for VCs. Together they sketch a market where going public is losing its pull even as investor terms tighten.

First-order effects

  • For founders heading into 2017 raises, the survey confirms weaker hand: two-thirds acknowledge investors set the terms, so cap-table concessions and down-round pressure become the default negotiation posture.
  • A 31% no-IPO cohort reshapes exit planning for First Round's portfolio and peers — acquisition or staying private becomes the explicit endgame for roughly a third of companies rather than a fallback.

Second-order effects

  • The leverage shift proves durable rather than cyclical: a year later, First Round's follow-up survey shows 53% of founders still saying investors had more sway in their most recent deal (with hiring pain also flipping from engineers to sales leaders) — competitors' funds can no longer win deals on valuation alone.
  • If fewer companies target listings, late-stage capital has to underwrite longer private holds, pushing secondary sales and structured rounds up the agenda for growth-stage funds.

Third-order effects

  • By First Round's [[a:948930|2019 edition, where 65% of founders expected 2020 fundraising to be hard and a third feared the end of a tech bubble]], the annual survey had hardened into a standing barometer: recurring founder-sentiment data now functions as an early-warning system for where the venture cycle stands.

The trend: Founder sentiment surveys are becoming the venture industry's cycle gauge, tracking a structural tilt of negotiating power from founders toward concentrated pools of capital as the IPO path narrows.