/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Source: Goldman Sachs and Spanish banking group Banco Santander leave R3 blockchain consortium amid structural changes to deal

Pete Rizzo / CoinDesk : Tweets: @tuurdemeester Tweets: Tuur Demeester / @tuurdemeester : “though it is known R3 is now soliciting as much as $150m in funding from its members” http://www.coindesk.com/...

CoinDesk Pete Rizzo

Context & Ripple Effects

Goldman Sachs and Banco Santander were among the nine banks that joined R3 in September 2015 to build a shared framework for blockchain tech in markets. The exit lands just as R3 restructures its fundraising: the consortium has cut its target by $50M to $150M and revised terms so bank members take a 60% equity stake instead of the originally planned 90%.

The timing matters because both departing banks have been building parallel rails outside R3 — Santander is part of the Bank of America–led Ripple payments network formed weeks earlier, suggesting the exits are less a retreat from distributed ledgers than a shift toward direct vendor relationships.

First-order effects

  • R3 loses two marquee founding members at the exact moment it is soliciting up to $150M from its own members, shrinking both the capital pool and the roster it can pitch to remaining banks.
  • Remaining members inherit weaker terms than the original structure promised — 60% equity rather than 90% — reducing their upside for staying in.

Second-order effects

  • Santander's move validates the direct-vendor route over consortium equity: its Ripple partnership gives it working payment rails without tying capital to R3's restructured round.
  • Other member banks now face a fork — match the departed banks' vendor-first posture or double down on R3's cheaper, more member-friendly equity terms to keep the consortium alive.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, bank blockchain efforts migrate from collectively owned consortia toward per-bank deployments on vendor platforms like Ripple — a structure Santander itself confirmed when it launched cross-border blockchain payments in 2018.
  • Consortium models survive only where they offer technology members cannot buy individually; R3's eventual $107M raise with outside investors like Intel signals the pivot from pure bank ownership to mixed funding.

The trend: Bank blockchain collaboration is shifting from jointly owned consortia toward individual banks contracting directly with ledger vendors, with R3's restructuring and member exits marking the turning point.