/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Report: AWS has 45% share of worldwide public Infrastructure as a Service market, more than Microsoft, Google, and IBM combined

Amazon Web Services holds a 45 percent share of the worldwide public market for Infrastructure as a service (IaaS) — greater than Microsoft …

GeekWire Dan Richman

Context & Ripple Effects

At the time of this report, AWS's 45% public IaaS share was the high-water mark of early cloud consolidation — a single vendor outsizing Microsoft, Google, and IBM put together. The coverage arc since then is a story of that dominance eroding in relative terms while the pie explodes.

The follow-on data points trace the compression: by the 2018 RightScale State of the Cloud report, AWS enterprise adoption was still growing but its lead was shrinking as Azure grew 35%, Google 26%, and IBM 50%; Gartner's 2020 survey showed Azure growing ~60% against AWS's ~29%; and by Q1 2024 Altimeter pegged AWS at 31% with Azure at 25% and Google at 11% (Synergy/Altimeter data).

First-order effects

  • In 2016, Microsoft, Google, and IBM each faced the direct problem that their entire IaaS businesses combined were smaller than AWS's — pricing power and reference-customer gravity sat with Amazon.

Second-order effects

  • The named challengers responded with faster growth rates rather than price wars alone: Azure's ~60% growth in 2020 versus AWS's ~29% (Gartner) and IBM's 50% enterprise adoption growth in 2018 (RightScale) show share being bought back through hybrid and enterprise relationships.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, cloud infrastructure settles into a durable three-player oligopoly — AWS first, Azure closing, Google third — where no vendor regains 45%-style dominance because enterprises deliberately multi-source, as the RightScale adoption data already implied.

The trend: Cloud infrastructure is consolidating around a few hyperscale platforms whose leader's relative share steadily compresses even as absolute spending grows every year.