In a letter, Kamala Harris is endorsed for president by 88 corporate leaders, including Yelp CEO Jeremy Stoppelman and Ripple co-founder Chris Larsen
Many are former CEOs of big public companies … Forums: r/antiwork : Eighty-eight corporate leaders endorse Harris in new letter, including CEOs of Yelp, Box r/KamalaHarris : Eighty-eight corporate leaders endorse Harris in new letter, including CEOs of Yelp, Box r/democrats : Eighty-eight corporate leaders endorse Harris in new letter, including CEOs of Yelp, Box r/DeFranco : Eighty-eight corporate leaders endorse Harris in new letter, including CEOs of Yelp, Box r/politics : Eighty-eight corporate leaders endorse Harris in new letter, including CEOs of Yelp, Box r/neoliberal : Eighty-eight corporate leaders endorse Harris in new letter, including CEOs of Yelp, Box See also Mediagazer
Context & Ripple Effects
This broadens a visible Bay Area and technology-finance constituency around Harris: related coverage had already documented growing support from tech donors and a separate VC pledge to vote and raise campaign money.
The inclusion of Ripple co-founder Chris Larsen also connects business support to a policy-sensitive crypto constituency that Harris later sought to engage through outreach to crypto investors and pro-crypto Democrats.
First-order effects
- Harris gains a public roster of individual corporate validators that the campaign can use to demonstrate support beyond conventional party and labor constituencies.
- The named executives, including Jeremy Stoppelman and Chris Larsen, publicly associate themselves with Harris, making their political positioning more visible to employees, customers, and industry peers.
Second-order effects
- The letter reinforces pressure on technology and venture-capital networks to treat political support as a coordinated coalition rather than isolated founder activity.
- Larsen's participation gives crypto-aligned supporters a prominent place in the coalition, complementing the campaign's effort to engage that constituency without implying a specific policy commitment.
Third-order effects
- If executive endorsements continue to cluster by sector, campaign coalitions will increasingly be organized around industry networks and policy exposure, not just corporate PACs or party institutions.
- This could make leaders' personal political activity a more consequential governance and reputational issue for companies, especially in sectors facing active policy debates.
The trend: The story is one data point in the increasing use of executive and investor networks as organized political infrastructure around technology and sector-specific policy interests.