Sources: Apple will get an observer role on OpenAI's board, with Phil Schiller chosen for the position, as part of their ChatGPT partnership announced in June
CDK Says ‘Substantially All’ Car Dealerships Restored After Hack — Northern Data May Be Testing Limits of AI Frenzy With Unit IPO
BloombergMark Gurman
Context & Ripple Effects
The reported governance tie followed Apple’s June ChatGPT agreement, structured without an upfront payment to OpenAI and with Apple aiming for eventual revenue-sharing arrangements with chatbot providers a distribution deal designed to evolve into revenue sharing. It matters because the partnership was set to place ChatGPT in Siri and other Apple apps, making the relationship central to Apple’s consumer-AI rollout ChatGPT’s planned integration across Apple apps.
Related coverage subsequently reported that Apple would not take the observer seat as AI antitrust scrutiny increased the reported retreat from the observer role. That reversal makes the initial appointment a useful marker of how quickly governance links can become a regulatory issue.
First-order effects
Apple would gain a formal observation channel into OpenAI through Phil Schiller, deepening the companies’ relationship beyond product integration.
OpenAI would add Apple to the group of partners with structured access to its board-level discussions, while retaining the distinction between an observer role and a board seat.
Second-order effects
The governance connection raises the visibility of Apple’s influence over a model provider whose technology was being integrated into Apple’s products, increasing the likelihood of antitrust attention; related coverage indicates that concern ultimately affected the arrangement antitrust scrutiny around the planned role.
Both companies may need to rely more on commercial and operational coordination than formal board access, preserving the partnership while reducing the appearance of governance overlap.
Third-order effects
If major platform companies continue to distribute third-party AI models, regulators may scrutinize not only ownership stakes but also board access and other informal channels of influence.
AI partnerships are likely to separate product distribution from governance more deliberately, with contractual integrations and recurring partner engagement taking the place of formal observer roles where scrutiny is high.
The trend: Consumer-platform AI partnerships are moving from simple model integrations toward deeper strategic coordination, even as governance ties face closer antitrust scrutiny.
“Sources: Apple will get an observer role on OpenAI's board, with Phil Schiller chosen for the position, as part of their partnership announced last month” Phil and the Microsoft observer will employ “rock, paper, scissors” when they disagree on strategy.
I'm starting to think it might be problematic for your CEO to have no stake in your business because it really feels like Apple and Microsoft have captured all the value and upside from OpenAI with relatively minimal spend (Azure credits aren't cash and Apple's given zero dollars…
OpenAI is trying to keep its consumer business alive and relevant-we don't know the compensation terms, but this is still a Hail Mary for them on distribution vs Google Gemini and Meta AI, and they're unhappy with the MSFT deal terms. …
So let me get this straight, Microsoft paid $10+bn to OpenAI and worked really hard to supply a ton of H100s so OAI can be on iOS and MacOS. And now, Apple will have as much control on OAI as Microsoft? Tim Cook, wow, just wow.👏👏👏
something i think about a lot is that, for all its kinda underwhelming-ness, the Uber tv show on Showtime (Super Pumped) absolutely nailed its portrayal of how ruthless tim cook is. hank azaria deserves a lot more credit than i'm sure he got for it.
The board observer role will put Apple on par with Microsoft, OpenAI's biggest backer and its main AI technology provider. But having Microsoft and Apple sit in on board meetings could create complications for the tech giants, who are major rivals.
The question is now whether regulators like the CMA will conclude Apple has “material influence” over OpenAI. And the fact of the matter is that Apple's control of access to most of the world's richest billion people gives them more power than the commodity that is cloud compute.
Apple getting a non-voting OpenAI board seat for “free” while it took Microsoft $13 billion to get the same thing. This goes to show the power of being a gatekeeper. Since OpenAI can't pay Apple billions for placement like Google does with search, this is the next best thing [ima…
NEW: Apple will get a board observer seat at OpenAI later this year as part its partnership for Apple Intelligence. The person getting the seat: Phil Schiller, the head of the App Store and former marketing chief. https://www.bloomberg.com/...