/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

2015 Tech IPOs Underwhelm to the Tune of 30% From Their First Day Close

tl;dr 2015 tech IPOs aren't performing well.  Their decline could limit 2016 IPOs, and dampen valuations for growing private tech companies.  —  The 2015 technology IPO market was lackluster. Tweets: @om Tweets: Om Malik / @om : So this is what @alex is doing at @mattermark Interesting source of future editorial goodness. http://mattermark.com/...

Mattermark Alex Wilhelm

Context & Ripple Effects

The 2015 window was already the thinnest since the financial crisis — only seven VC-backed tech companies had gone public by mid-year the slowest VC-backed tech IPO pace since 2009, and by December just 28 US tech listings existed with half trading below their offer price half of 2015's 28 tech IPOs below their IPO price. Mattermark's data sharpens that picture: the class is down roughly 30% not from its IPO price but from its first-day close, meaning even buyers who paid the opening pop are underwater.

First-order effects

Second-order effects

  • With public comps repricing downward, startups face pressure to stay private longer at higher paper valuations rather than mark down to market — the dynamic the mid-2015 coverage flagged when delayed IPOs and inflated private rounds were already distorting both sides of the market delayed IPOs and higher private valuations.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, the private valuation–liquidity gap widens structurally: late-stage investors demand downside protection and IPO windows stay gated on a handful of successful debuts resetting comparables — a cycle that persisted until volume finally recovered, as it did by mid-2018 when 28 deals raised roughly $12.2B US tech IPO volume nearly doubling in H1 2018.

The trend: Tech's exit pipeline is cycling through a valuation reset in which weak debut classes suppress new listings and push capital to stay private until public comparables recover.