/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Just 28 tech companies entered the US public markets in 2015, and half of those now trade below their IPO price

Katie Roof / TechCrunch :

TechCrunch Katie Roof

Context & Ripple Effects

Katie Roof's year-end tally closes out a drought that was visible by June, when Fortune counted just seven VC-backed tech IPOs and called 2015 the slowest such year since the financial crisis. The full-year figure of 28 US tech listings — half now trading below their offer price — confirms the window never reopened.

A Mattermark analysis in January found the same cohort closed their first days an average of 30% below the debut price, so the weakness is not just post-IPO drift but pricing at issuance. Three years later Dealogic counted 38 billion-dollar-plus tech IPOs, the most since 2000 — making 2015 the trough of a cycle that has since swung hard both ways.

First-order effects

  • The 14 issuers trading underwater leave their underwriting banks with a damaged track record just as fee-starved equity desks head into a thinner 2016 pipeline.
  • Venture and growth-stage investors in companies that stayed private face weaker comparable valuations for marking their portfolios and pricing future rounds.

Second-order effects

  • When the market reopened in 2018, issuers responded to memories of debuts like these by selling smaller stakes — Dealogic found startups floating just 17% of themselves on average — and roughly 44% raised secondaries within 180 days to cash out without enlarging the offering.
  • Private capital absorbed supply that public markets declined: with only seven VC-backed tech listings by mid-2015, late-stage rounds and secondary platforms became the default liquidity route for companies that would previously have gone public.

Third-order effects

  • The 2015 trough, the 2018 record, and 2022's collapse — when Ernst & Young measured US tech IPO proceeds falling 94% from $155.8B to $8.6B and FactSet counted no $1B-plus deal all year — sketch a structurally cyclical listing window rather than a steadily open one.
  • If the pattern holds, tech companies treat going public as an opportunistic event timed to windows rather than a milestone on a fixed path, which concentrates public-market exposure in whatever cohort lists during each brief opening.

The trend: Tech IPO activity is swinging between multi-year droughts and short floods as private capital substitutes for public listings, leaving each listing window's cohort to set the tone for the next.