/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

A survey of 9,388 software engineers in December 2023: ~90% believe getting a job now is harder than pre-pandemic and 60%+ believe AI will lead to less hiring

Maxwell Strachan / VICE :

VICE Maxwell Strachan

Context & Ripple Effects

The survey arrived after evidence of a premium for AI and ML specialists, including higher pay for senior AI and ML engineers. It captures the other side of that shift: a broad sense among engineers that general software hiring had become materially less accessible.

Later coverage made the concern more concrete, with software-development postings falling more than 30% from February 2020 and evidence of weaker employment for AI-exposed entry-level workers. The survey is therefore useful as an early measure of how the labor market was being interpreted by its participants, not proof that AI had already displaced them.

First-order effects

  • The results document a sharp deterioration in software engineers' confidence in the job market: roughly nine in 10 respondents saw job seeking as harder than before the pandemic.
  • More than 60% expected AI to reduce hiring, giving employers and recruiters a workforce that increasingly views automation as a constraint on openings rather than solely a productivity tool.

Second-order effects

Third-order effects

  • If this pattern persists, software employment may become more bifurcated: smaller pools of specialized workers retain pricing power while entry-level pathways and generalist hiring narrow.
  • AI's role in staffing decisions may remain difficult to measure because employers can frame freezes or layoffs around AI even when replacement is limited; a later hiring-manager survey found AI was often emphasized in workforce explanations despite few reporting full role replacement.

The trend: This is one early signal of an AI-era software labor market in which demand concentrates around specialized capabilities while the entry-level and generalist pipeline faces greater uncertainty.

Discussion

  • @grady_booch Grady Booch on x
    “an industry-wide downturn and the looming threat of artificial intelligence that is spurring growing competition for software jobs.” https://www.vice.com/...
  • @fletcher0xff Ashley Fletcher on x
    Programmers are losing faith in the idea they'll always be able to find a new job when they need one, with only 6 percent “extremely confident” and 32 percent “not at all confident.” https://www.vice.com/...
  • @teamblind Blind on x
    Software engineers are increasingly pessimistic about the job market. In an exclusive Blind survey for @motherboard, nearly 90% said it was more difficult to get a job now than before the pandemic. @maxwellstrachan on the vibe shift: https://www.vice.com/...
  • @maxwellstrachan Maxwell on x
    new: even software engineers say the job market is “insane” and “terrible” now. for this story, blind polled 10k software engineers for motherboard. only 6% were confident they'd get another job with the same pay if they lost their current gig. https://www.vice.com/...