/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Users say X is increasingly showing malicious crypto ads, including links to crypto drainers, fake airdrops, and Telegram channels promoting pump and dumps

Cybercriminals are abusing X advertisements to promote websites that lead to crypto drainers, fake airdrops, and other scams.

BleepingComputer Lawrence Abrams

Context & Ripple Effects

The report follows December coverage that identified Google and X ads directing users to MS Drainer sites and separate reports of crypto-account impersonation on X used to distribute fraudulent links. Together, the coverage shows attackers combining paid distribution with familiar crypto social-engineering lures.

Telegram is part of the reported conversion path: ads can send users from a mainstream platform into channels promoting pump-and-dump schemes, where moderation and attribution can be harder for users to assess.

First-order effects

  • X users exposed to these ads face an immediate risk of being routed to wallet-draining sites, fake airdrops, or coordinated trading scams.
  • The reports put X’s ad-review and enforcement controls under sharper scrutiny, particularly for crypto promotions that use paid placement to gain credibility.

Second-order effects

  • Crypto brands and legitimate advertisers may face greater user skepticism when impersonation and malicious paid ads appear alongside genuine promotions.
  • Scammers can shift victims across platforms—from X ads to Telegram channels—making takedown efforts dependent on coordination across the advertising, social, and messaging layers.

Third-order effects

  • If paid social inventory remains a reliable acquisition channel for crypto fraud, platform trust and ad-safety controls become a larger part of the crypto sector’s legitimacy and consumer-protection problem.
  • The pattern favors fraud operations that distribute risk across ad accounts, landing pages, and messaging communities; durable mitigation would require disruption across that chain rather than isolated content removals.

The trend: Crypto scams are increasingly using mainstream ad platforms for reach and messaging communities for conversion, widening the gap between crypto promotion and consumer trust.