/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

ScamSniffer: Google and X ads are promoting sites containing “MS Drainer”, a cryptocurrency drainer that has stolen $59M from 63,210 victims since March 2023

Google and Twitter ads are promoting sites containing a cryptocurrency drainer named ‘MS Drainer’ that has already stolen $59 million …

BleepingComputer Bill Toulas

Context & Ripple Effects

This is part of a recurring pattern in which paid search placement is used to impersonate trusted crypto destinations: earlier reporting documented attackers using Google Search ads to steer people to fake wallet domains in a long-running Google Search ad scam.

The problem is not confined to search. Reports shortly afterward described more malicious crypto ads appearing on X, suggesting that ad inventory can amplify wallet-draining and token-promotion scams across major consumer platforms.

First-order effects

  • People who reach the promoted sites face immediate risk of crypto theft; ScamSniffer attributes $59 million in losses across 63,210 victims to MS Drainer since March 2023.
  • Google and X’s ad products become a distribution channel for the malicious sites, putting the effectiveness of their ad-review and takedown processes under scrutiny.

Second-order effects

  • Wallet providers, crypto projects, and security-monitoring services must spend more on warnings and detection because paid placements can make fraudulent destinations appear more credible than unsolicited links.
  • Repeated malicious-ad reports can push platforms toward tighter crypto-ad verification and faster enforcement, increasing friction for legitimate crypto advertisers as well as scammers.

Third-order effects

  • If paid ads remain a reliable route to wallet drainers, trust in platform-delivered crypto discovery will erode and safety checks will shift from optional security tooling toward a core part of the crypto user journey.
  • The episode reinforces the crypto legitimacy gap: familiar ad surfaces can confer credibility without establishing that a promoted financial service is safe.

The trend: Crypto scams are increasingly exploiting mainstream advertising infrastructure to borrow platform trust and reach users at scale.